Erythema Toxicum Neonatorum

Back

Background

Erythema toxicum neonatorum (ETN) is a benign self-limited eruption that occurs primarily in healthy newborns in the early neonatal period. It is characterized by macular erythema, papules, vesicles, and pustules (see the image below), and it resolves without permanent sequelae.[1]



View Image

Erythema toxicum neonatorum. Five-day-old newborn with erythematous papules with surrounding indistinct blotchy erythema visible on abdomen. Image fro....

Pathophysiology

Increased levels of immunologic and inflammatory mediators (eg, interleukins [ILs] 1 and 8, eotaxin, the adhesion molecule E-selectin, the water-channel proteins aquaphorin 1 and aquaphorin 3, the chemotactic factor psoriasin, high-mobility group box chromosomal protein 1, nitric oxide and its isoforms, and the antimicrobial peptide LL-37) suggest that ETN is an immune system reaction.[2, 3, 4, 5] The localization of ETN to primarily hair-bearing areas suggests that the hair follicle may be involved. Additionally, the number of mast cells is increased around hair follicles in involved skin.[6]

Although the eosinophilic infiltrate of ETN suggests an allergic- or hypersensitivity-related etiology, no allergens have been identified. Newborn skin appears to respond to any injury with an eosinophilic infiltrate. The observation that ETN is rarely seen in premature infants suggests that immunologically mature newborn skin is required to produce this reaction pattern.[2]

Etiology

The cause of ETN has not been established. Multiple theories have been proposed to explain this common disorder.

Neonates have an increased number of hair follicles as compared with adults, and the occurrence of ETN in non-hair-bearing areas (eg, palms and soles) is rare. Inflammatory cells tend to concentrate around hair follicles, and coccilike microbes have been demonstrated in the follicular epithelium and inside the inflammatory cells. This suggests that ETN represents a response to microbes that have penetrated the hair follicle.[2] This process may be integral in developing the new immune system.[7]

The high frequency of eosinophilia suggests an allergic basis, leading some authors to suggest that ETN may be an immediate hypersensitivity reaction to a substance passed from the mother transplacentally; however, this view has not received convincing support. No responsible exotoxin, allergen, component of sebum, or infectious agent has been definitively linked to ETN. Neither medications administered to newborns nor the mode of feeding has been shown to have an effect on incidence.

Other proposed theories have included a transient adjustment reaction of the skin to mechanical or thermal stimulation and an acute graft-versus-host reaction induced by the maternal-fetal transfer of lymphocytes before or during delivery. However, one analysis of skin samples from two male patients with ETN did not support a graft-versus-host reaction, because fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) examination of cells with two XX chromosomes did not find any maternal cells in the samples.[8]

Contactants and mechanical irritation have been considered and rejected as etiologies.

Risk factors include higher birth weight, greater gestational age, and vaginal delivery. A positive correlation has been recognized between the length of labor and both the incidence of ETN and the duration of the cutaneous manifestations.[9, 10]

Epidemiology

United States and international statistics

A review of cutaneous findings in US newborns across a range of ethnic groups found ETN to have an incidence of 7%.[11]  Other studies involving US populations have reported incidence figures as high as 30%.[12]

International studies have found a similarly broad range in the incidence of ETN, from approximately one third to approximately one half of full-term infants. A Brazilian study reported a prevalence of 21.3%.[13]  A cross-sectional observational study (N = 474) from India cited a prevalence of 8.43% for ETN.[14]

Age-, sex-, and race-related demographics

ETN presents within the first 4 days of life in full-term infants, with the peak onset occurring within the first 48 hours following birth. Rare cases have been reported at birth.[15, 16]  The incidence rises with increasing gestational age and birth weight. In rare cases, delayed onset may occur in full-term and preterm infants up to age 14 days.[17, 18]

The prevalence is higher in males (55%) than in females (30%),[9, 13] except among females born of first pregnancies, who have a higher rate than males of first pregnancies.

No racial or ethnic predisposition is known.

Prognosis

The prognosis for patients with ETN is excellent. ETN is a transient eruption with spontaneous resolution and no associated long-term morbidity. It may recur in approximately 11% of patients up to age 6 weeks; however, recurrences tend to be mild and to resolve without sequelae. Although one study found that infants with ETN had an increased risk of atopy,[19]  this finding has not been supported by subsequent studies.

Patient Education

It is important to reassure parents that ETN is not inherited or infectious, has no complications, and has an excellent prognosis with spontaneous resolution.

History

In evaluating for erythema toxicum neonatorum (ETN), the history should focus on the following:

Infants with ETN are otherwise healthy and lack systemic symptoms. The eruption is self-limited; most cases resolve within 5-14 days without residual sequelae. Recurrences are uncommon but have been reported up to the sixth week of life. They tend to be mild in severity.

Physical Examination

The physical examination should focus on the location, size, and distribution of macules, wheals, papules, and pustules on the skin. The absence of mucosal, palmar, or plantar involvement (ie, lesions on non-hair-bearing skin) is characteristic of ETN. Signs of systemic toxicity, including hypothermia or hyperthermia, lethargy, and irritability, are not associated with ETN.

ETN most commonly presents with a blotchy, evanescent, macular erythema, often on the face or trunk. The macules are irregular, blanchable, and vary in size. In more severe cases, pale yellow or white wheals or papules on an erythematous base may follow. In approximately 10% of patients, 2- to 4-mm pustules develop. (See the images below.)



View Image

Erythema toxicum neonatorum. Five-day-old newborn with erythematous papules with surrounding indistinct blotchy erythema visible on abdomen. Image fro....



View Image

Erythema toxicum neonatorum. Yellow pustules, some with evidence of rupture, in full-term infant at 6 hours of life.

The number and distribution of lesions can range from a few and widely scattered to numerous and extensive. The most common sites include the trunk (see the image below), the buttocks, and the proximal limbs, but lesions may occur anywhere, including the genitalia.[21]  As noted, involvement of the mucous membranes or the palms and soles is rare.



View Image

Erythema toxicum neonatorum. Erythematous blotchy patches localized to trunk in neonate.

Complications

Complications of ETN are not commonly reported. However, one report described a strong association between ETN and eosinophilic esophagitis.[22]

Laboratory Studies

Erythema toxicum neonatorum (ETN) is diagnosed clinically on the basis of history, physical examination, and peripheral smear of intralesional contents.

On a complete blood count (CBC), eosinophilia is noted in approximately 15% of patients as accounting for as much as 18% of the total white blood cell (WBC) count. Eosinophilia may be more pronounced when the eruption shows a marked pustular component.

A Wright stain performed on intralesional contents will reveal primarily eosinophils. Inflammatory cells are present, including more than 90% eosinophils and variable numbers of neutrophils.[10, 24]

Other Tests

If clinical symptoms warrant concern for systemic disease, Giemsa stain fails to show eosinophils, or clinical suspicion warrants an evaluation of other diagnoses, viral, bacterial, and fungal cultures should be performed to exclude herpes simplex virus (HSV), varicella-zoster virus (VZV), pathogenic bacterial, and yeast infections.

A potassium hydroxide (KOH) preparation should be used to exclude candidiasis.

Procedures

A skin biopsy is diagnostic but is rarely required for the diagnosis of ETN.

Histologic Findings

Histologic examination of ETN macules reveals mild dermal edema with a sparse predominantly perivascular inflammatory infiltrate composed primarily of eosinophils, with small numbers of neutrophils and monocytes. Papules have increased edema and inflammatory infiltrate with involvement of the superficial portion of the pilosebaceous unit. Eosinophilic invasion of the outer root sheath of the hair follicle is noted. Pustules are subcorneal or intraepidermal and are found in association with the pilosebaceous orifice. A variable infiltrate of eosinophils and monocytes may be seen with or without neutrophils in the surrounding dermis.[25]

Medical Care

The diagnosis of erythema toxicum neonatorum (ETN) rests on recognizing the characteristic history and physical findings in an otherwise healthy newborn. A complete history, a physical examination, and a Tzanck smear are required to differentiate between benign transient pustular eruptions of the newborn and life-threatening disease.

Because ETN is a benign self-limited disorder, no treatment is necessary. Parents should be reassured regarding the benign and transitory nature of the condition.

Long-Term Monitoring

Most cases of ETN resolve within 3-4 days after onset without residua. Recurrences are rare but may be seen in a small number of patients up to age 6 weeks. In these instances, follow-up examination may be necessary.

What is erythema toxicum neonatorum (ETN)?What is the pathophysiology of erythema toxicum neonatorum (ETN)?What causes erythema toxicum neonatorum (ETN)?What are the risk factors for erythema toxicum neonatorum (ETN)?What is the prevalence of erythema toxicum neonatorum (ETN) in the US?What is the global prevalence of erythema toxicum neonatorum (ETN)?What are the racial predilections of erythema toxicum neonatorum (ETN)?What are the sexual predilections of erythema toxicum neonatorum (ETN)?What is the prevalence of erythema toxicum neonatorum (ETN) by age?What is the prognosis of erythema toxicum neonatorum (ETN)?What should be included in patient education about erythema toxicum neonatorum (ETN)?Which clinical history findings are characteristic of erythema toxicum neonatorum (ETN)?What is included in the physical exam for evaluation of erythema toxicum neonatorum (ETN)?Which physical findings are characteristic of erythema toxicum neonatorum (ETN)?What are the possible complications of erythema toxicum neonatorum (ETN)?Which conditions should be included in the differential diagnoses of erythema toxicum neonatorum (ETN)?What are the differential diagnoses for Erythema Toxicum Neonatorum?What is the role of lab testing in the workup of erythema toxicum neonatorum (ETN)?What is the role of cultures in the workup of erythema toxicum neonatorum (ETN)?How is candidiasis excluded in the workup of erythema toxicum neonatorum (ETN)?What is the role of skin biopsy in the workup of erythema toxicum neonatorum (ETN)?Which histologic findings are characteristic of erythema toxicum neonatorum (ETN)?How is erythema toxicum neonatorum (ETN) treated?What is included in long-term monitoring of erythema toxicum neonatorum (ETN)?

Author

Neil F Gibbs, MD, Residency Assistant Program Director, Pediatric Dermatologist, Department of Dermatology, Naval Medical Center, San Diego; Clinical Professor of Dermatology, Clinical Professor of Pediatrics (Secondary), Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences School of Medicine

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Meghan E Seago, MD, Staff Dermatologist, US Naval Hospital Guam

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editors

Michael J Wells, MD, FAAD, Dermatologic/Mohs Surgeon, The Surgery Center at Plano Dermatology

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Van Perry, MD, Assistant Professor, Department of Medicine, Division of Dermatology, University of Texas School of Medicine at San Antonio

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

William D James, MD, Emeritus Professor, Department of Dermatology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine

Disclosure: Received income in an amount equal to or greater than $250 from: Elsevier<br/>Served as a speaker for various universities, dermatology societies, and dermatology departments.

Additional Contributors

Eleanor E Sahn, MD, Director, Division of Pediatric Dermatology, Associate Professor, Departments of Dermatology and Pediatrics, Medical University of South Carolina

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

Trisha C Beute, MD Staff Physician, Department of Dermatology, Naval Medical Center, Portsmouth

Trisha C Beute, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha and American Academy of Dermatology

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Robert Huff, MD Dermatology, Inc

Robert Huff, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Dermatology and Phi Beta Kappa

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Eleanor E Sahn, MD Director, Division of Pediatric Dermatology, Associate Professor, Departments of Dermatology and Pediatrics, Medical University of South Carolina

Eleanor E Sahn, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Academy of Dermatology, and Southern Medical Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

References

  1. Snyder KAM, Voelckers AD. Newborn Skin: Part I. Common Rashes and Skin Changes. Am Fam Physician. 2024 Mar. 109 (3):212-216. [View Abstract]
  2. Schoch JJ, Monir RL, Satcher KG, Harris J, Triplett E, Neu J. The infantile cutaneous microbiome: A review. Pediatr Dermatol. 2019 Sep. 36 (5):574-580. [View Abstract]
  3. Marchini G, Hultenby K, Nelson A, Yektaei-Karin E, Ståbi B, Lonne-Rahm S, et al. Increased expression of HMGB-1 in the skin lesions of erythema toxicum. Pediatr Dermatol. 2007 Sep-Oct. 24 (5):474-82. [View Abstract]
  4. Marchini G, Lindow S, Brismar H, Ståbi B, Berggren V, Ulfgren AK, et al. The newborn infant is protected by an innate antimicrobial barrier: peptide antibiotics are present in the skin and vernix caseosa. Br J Dermatol. 2002 Dec. 147 (6):1127-34. [View Abstract]
  5. Marchini G, Ståbi B, Kankes K, Lonne-Rahm S, Østergaard M, Nielsen S. AQP1 and AQP3, psoriasin, and nitric oxide synthases 1-3 are inflammatory mediators in erythema toxicum neonatorum. Pediatr Dermatol. 2003 Sep-Oct. 20 (5):377-84. [View Abstract]
  6. Nelson A, Ulfgren AK, Edner J, Ståbi B, Brismar H, Hultenby K, et al. Urticaria Neonatorum: accumulation of tryptase-expressing mast cells in the skin lesions of newborns with Erythema Toxicum. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2007 Dec. 18 (8):652-8. [View Abstract]
  7. Marchini G, Nelson A, Edner J, Lonne-Rahm S, Stavréus-Evers A, Hultenby K. Erythema toxicum neonatorum is an innate immune response to commensal microbes penetrated into the skin of the newborn infant. Pediatr Res. 2005 Sep. 58 (3):613-6. [View Abstract]
  8. Droitcourt C, Khosrotehran K, Halaby E, Aractingi S. Maternal cells are not responsible [corrected] for erythema toxicum neonatorum [corrected]. Pediatr Dermatol. 2008 May-Jun. 25 (3):411-3. [View Abstract]
  9. Liu C, Feng J, Qu R, Zhou H, Ma H, Niu X, et al. Epidemiologic study of the predisposing factors in erythema toxicum neonatorum. Dermatology. 2005. 210 (4):269-72. [View Abstract]
  10. Monteagudo B, Labandeira J, Cabanillas M, Acevedo A, Toribio J. Prospective study of erythema toxicum neonatorum: epidemiology and predisposing factors. Pediatr Dermatol. 2012 Mar-Apr. 29 (2):166-8. [View Abstract]
  11. Kanada KN, Merin MR, Munden A, Friedlander SF. A prospective study of cutaneous findings in newborns in the United States: correlation with race, ethnicity, and gestational status using updated classification and nomenclature. J Pediatr. 2012 Aug. 161 (2):240-5. [View Abstract]
  12. Jacobs AH, Walton RG. The incidence of birthmarks in the neonate. Pediatrics. 1976 Aug. 58 (2):218-22. [View Abstract]
  13. Reginatto FP, Muller FM, Peruzzo J, Cestari TF. Epidemiology and Predisposing Factors for Erythema Toxicum Neonatorum and Transient Neonatal Pustular: A Multicenter Study. Pediatr Dermatol. 2017 Jul. 34 (4):422-426. [View Abstract]
  14. Quazi S, Choudhary S, Singh A, Madke B, Khan K, Singh S. A cross-sectional study on the prevalence and determinants of various neonatal dermatoses. J Family Med Prim Care. 2023 Nov. 12 (11):2942-2949. [View Abstract]
  15. Nakamura T, Xiuri J, Yamada S. Investigation of biomarkers in an infant with erythema toxicum neonatorum present at birth. Pediatr Int. 2023 Jan. 65 (1):e15456. [View Abstract]
  16. Yoshida S, Yatsuzuka K, Chigyo K, Kuroo Y, Takemoto K, Sayama K. A Case of Eosinophilic Pustular Folliculitis since Birth. Children (Basel). 2021 Jan 7. 8 (1):[View Abstract]
  17. Akoglu G, Ersoy Evans S, Akca T, Sahin S. An unusual presentation of erythema toxicum neonatorum: delayed onset in a preterm infant. Pediatr Dermatol. 2006 May-Jun. 23 (3):301-2. [View Abstract]
  18. Chang MW, Jiang SB, Orlow SJ. Atypical erythema toxicum neonatorum of delayed onset in a term infant. Pediatr Dermatol. 1999 Mar-Apr. 16 (2):137-41. [View Abstract]
  19. Singh M, Arora NK, Sroa HS. Urticaria neonatorum--an earliest marker of atopy. Indian J Med Res. 1980 Feb. 71:273-7. [View Abstract]
  20. Monteagudo B, Labandeira J, Cabanillas M, Acevedo A, Toribio J. Prospective study of erythema toxicum neonatorum: epidemiology and predisposing factors. Pediatr Dermatol. 2012 Mar-Apr. 29 (2):166-8. [View Abstract]
  21. Maffei FA, Michaels MG, Wald ER. An unusual presentation of erythema toxicum scrotal pustules present at birth. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1996 Jun. 150 (6):649-50. [View Abstract]
  22. Witmer CP, Susi A, Min SB, Nylund CM. Early Infant Risk Factors for Pediatric Eosinophilic Esophagitis. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2018 Nov. 67 (5):610-615. [View Abstract]
  23. Michl C, Wohlrab J. Sterile transient neonatal pustulosis - overlap between transient neonatal pustular melanosis and erythema toxicum neonatorum. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2019 Jul. 17 (7):731-732. [View Abstract]
  24. Van Praag MC, Van Rooij RW, Folkers E, Spritzer R, Menke HE, Oranje AP. Diagnosis and treatment of pustular disorders in the neonate. Pediatr Dermatol. 1997 Mar-Apr. 14 (2):131-43. [View Abstract]
  25. Marchini G, Ulfgren AK, Loré K, Ståbi B, Berggren V, Lonne-Rahm S. Erythema toxicum neonatorum: an immunohistochemical analysis. Pediatr Dermatol. 2001 May-Jun. 18 (3):177-87. [View Abstract]

Erythema toxicum neonatorum. Five-day-old newborn with erythematous papules with surrounding indistinct blotchy erythema visible on abdomen. Image from Jining I Wang, MD.

Erythema toxicum neonatorum. Five-day-old newborn with erythematous papules with surrounding indistinct blotchy erythema visible on abdomen. Image from Jining I Wang, MD.

Erythema toxicum neonatorum. Yellow pustules, some with evidence of rupture, in full-term infant at 6 hours of life.

Erythema toxicum neonatorum. Erythematous blotchy patches localized to trunk in neonate.

Erythema toxicum neonatorum. Five-day-old newborn with erythematous papules with surrounding indistinct blotchy erythema visible on abdomen. Image from Jining I Wang, MD.

Erythema toxicum neonatorum. Yellow pustules, some with evidence of rupture, in full-term infant at 6 hours of life.

Erythema toxicum neonatorum. Erythematous blotchy patches localized to trunk in neonate.

Erythema toxicum neonatorum. Wright-Giemsa stain performed on contents of ruptured pustule reveal numerous eosinophils.