Erythema Multiforme

Back

Background

Erythema multiforme (EM) is an acute, self-limited, and sometimes recurring skin condition that is considered to be a type IV hypersensitivity reaction associated with certain infections, medications, and various other triggers.[1]  It has a wide spectrum of severity and occurs in both minor and major forms. 

EM minor represents a localized eruption of the skin with minimal or no mucosal involvement. The papules evolve into pathognomonic target or iris lesions that appear within a 72-hour period and begin on the extremities (see the first image below). Lesions remain in a fixed location for at least 7 days and then begin to heal. An arcuate appearance may be present (see the second image below). Precipitating factors include herpes simplex virus (HSV), Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), and histoplasmosis. Because this condition may be related to recurrent HSV, recurrences of EM may follow, with many affected individuals experiencing several recurrences per year.



View Image

Target lesion of erythema multiforme.



View Image

Raised atypical targets and arcuate lesions.

EM major is a more severe and potentially life-threatening disorder. One or more mucous membranes are involved, and as much as 10% of body area may have epidermal detachment. More than 50% of all cases are attributed to medications.

Erythema multiforme vs Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis

Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) have been considered severity variants of a single entity that has been divided into the following two broad categories: (1) EM, including both minor and major forms, and (2) SJS/TEN. Clinical descriptions are as follows:

More recent clinical data favor the view that EM and SJS, though sometimes confused with each other, are separate disorders.[1]

See also Dermatologic Manifestations of Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis.

Pathophysiology

The pathophysiology of EM has not been fully elucidated, but it is probably immunologically mediated and appears to involve a hypersensitivity reaction that can be triggered by a variety of stimuli (particularly bacterial, viral, or chemical).

Cell-mediated immunity appears to be responsible for the destruction of epithelial cells. Early in the disease process, the epidermis becomes infiltrated with CD8 T lymphocytes and macrophages, whereas the dermis displays a slight influx of CD4 lymphocytes. These immunologically active cells are not present in sufficient numbers to be directly responsible for epithelial cell death. Instead, they release diffusable cytokines, which mediate the inflammatory reaction and resultant apoptosis of epithelial cells.

In some patients, circulating T cells transiently (for < 30 d) demonstrate a T-helper cell type 1 (Th1) cytokine response (interferon [IFN] gamma, tumor necrosis factor [TNF]-α, interleukin [IL]-2). Results of immunohistochemical analysis have also shown lesion blister fluid to contain TNF, an important proinflammatory cytokine.

Other evidence supports the hypothesis that the disease is the result of cell-mediated immune reactions. Individuals possessing human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-B12 are three times more likely to develop this disorder. The classic timing for a primary cell-mediated immune reaction is 9-14 days after the initiation of the offending drug. In recurrent exposure, the reaction occurs within several hours to 1-2 days, which is consistent with the timing of a secondary cell-mediated immune response.

Herpes simplex virus

HSV is a major cause of EM[2] ; in fact, recent or recurrent herpes has been reported as the principal risk factor for EM. Herpes-associated EM (HAEM) appears to represent the result of a cell-mediated immune reaction associated with HSV antigen. The immunologic reaction affects HSV-expressing keratinocytes. Cytotoxic effector cells, CD8+ T lymphocytes in the epidermis, induce apoptosis of scattered keratinocytes and lead to satellite cell necrosis. Neighboring epidermal cells are HLA-DR positive.

A relationship exists between HLA types A33, B35, B62 (B15), DR4, DQB1*0301, DQ3, and DR53 and recurrent EM.[3] In particular, HLA-DQ3 is specifically related to recurrent EM and may be a helpful marker for distinguishing HAEM from other cutaneous diseases.[4]

Drug hypersensitivity

The disease process also often involves an abnormal metabolism of a responsible drug. As noted above, the keratinocyte is the ultimate target of this disease process, with keratinocyte necrosis being the earliest pathologic finding.

Patients frequently display an altered metabolism of the responsible drug and are considered to be slow acetylators, both genotypically and phenotypically. This means that an increased proportion of drug metabolism is directed toward the alternative pathway of oxidation by the cytochrome P-450 system, resulting in increased production of reactive and potentially toxic metabolites. Affected individuals have a defect in the ability to detoxify these reactive metabolites, which may then behave as haptens by binding covalently to proteins on the surface of epithelial cells. This may then induce the immune response, leading to the severe skin reaction.

Etiology

Many suspected etiologic factors have been reported to cause EM. Both EM and SJS may be induced by medications, but infectious agents are also considered to be a major cause of EM. Approximately 50% of cases are idiopathic, with no precipitating factor identified. Other reported risk factors include male sex and a previous history of EM; pregnancy may contribute to the development of EM as well. Postvaccination causes include bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccination, oral polio vaccine, vaccinia, and tetanus/diphtheria.

HSV and other infections

Infectious causes are more common in children and are implicated commonly in EM.

EM minor is regarded as being commonly triggered by HSV types 1 and 2, and HSV is the most common cause in young adults; in fact, many instances of idiopathic EM minor may be precipitated by subclinical HSV infection. Mycoplasmal infection is another common cause.

Bacterial

Bacterial infections that may trigger EM include the following:

Chlamydial infectious causes include lymphogranuloma venereum and psittacosis.

Viral

Viral infections that may trigger EM include the following:

An association with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection has been described.[9]  It has also been suggested that EM may be a potential adverse consequence of COVID-19 vaccination.[10]

Other virus-related causes include the virus-drug interactions CMV infection–terbinafine[11] and EBV infection–amoxicillin.[12]

Other

EM may also be triggered by fungal infections (eg, coccidioidomycosis, dermatophytosis, and histoplasmosis) and some parasitic infections (eg, Trichomonas species and Toxoplasma gondii).

Drugs

More than 50% of cases of EM major are related to medication use, but no test has conclusively established the link between a single case and a specific drug.

The most common pharmacologic triggers are the sulfa drugs (30% of cases). The second most commonly involved agents are the anticonvulsants, including the following:

Causative antibiotics include the following:

Antituberculoid agents (eg, rifampin, isoniazid, thiacetazone, and pyrazinamide) are also known offenders. Antipyretic agents as triggers include analgesics (especially aspirin), as well as phenylbutazone, oxyphenbutazone, and phenazone.

Others agents that may cause EM include the following:

Contact exposure

Contactants that may induce an EM-like eruption include the following:

Other etiologic factors

The following have also been reported as causes of EM:

Epidemiology

The exact incidence of EM in the United States is not defined; however, as many as 1% of dermatologic outpatient visits are for EM. Globally, the frequency of EM has been estimated to be in the range of 1.2-6 cases per million individuals per year.

Before the HIV epidemic among young males, EM showed a slight female predominance; however, it has since become more common in younger males (male-to-female ratio, 2-3:1), mainly seen in the second to fourth decades but sometimes also in children and adolescents (20%).[28]  EM is rare in children younger than 3 years and in adults older than 50 years.

The following medical conditions seem to predispose individuals to a higher risk of developing EM:

Individuals undergoing radiation therapy, chemotherapy, or neurosurgery for brain tumors are also at higher risk.

Prognosis

Most cases of EM are self-limited. In EM minor, the lesions evolve over 1-2 weeks and ultimately subside within 2-3 weeks without scarring. However, recurrence of EM minor is common, developing in as many as one third of cases, and is mostly preceded by apparent or subclinical HSV infection.

EM major has a mortality of less than 5%, which is directly proportional to the TBSA of sloughed epithelium. It usually has a more protracted course than EM minor, and clearing may require 3-6 weeks. Skin lesions usually heal with hyperpigmentation, hypopigmentation, or both. Scarring is usually absent, except after secondary infection. Sepsis secondary to loss of the cutaneous barrier is the principal cause of death.

Advanced age, visceral involvement, increased serum urea nitrogen level, and previous bone marrow transplantation are poor prognostic factors. Surprisingly, although people with HIV infection have an increased incidence of EM (approaching one case per 1000 individuals per year), they do not appear to have a higher mortality.

Continuous and persistent erythema multiforme

Two additional rare clinical forms of EM have been reported: continuous EM and persistent EM. Continuous EM manifests as a prolonged course with overlapping attacks and may be associated with systemic administration of glucocorticoids. Persistent EM has a protracted clinical course over months, is commonly associated with atypical skin lesions, and is commonly resistant to conventional treatment. It has been reported in association with IBD, occult renal carcinoma, persistent or reactivated EBV infection, and HSV infection.

Patient Education

Patients with EM should be educated regarding appropriate symptomatic treatment and reassured that the condition is usually self-limited. In addition, patients should be advised regarding the significant risk of recurrence and the possible need for suppressing recurrent HSV infection with appropriate antiviral therapy. (See Monitoring and Prevention.)

History

In addition to characterizing skin and mucous membrane lesions of erythema multiforme (EM), a complete history should document recent constitutional symptoms, previous or current herpes simplex virus (HSV) or M pneumoniae infection, and all use of prescription and over-the-counter (OTC) medications, with particular attention to those started in the preceding 2 months. Patients may have a history of anxiety.

Prodromal symptoms are usually absent or mild in persons with EM minor, consisting of a mild, nonspecific upper respiratory tract infection. The abrupt onset of a rash usually occurs within 3 days, starting on the extremities symmetrically, with centripetal spreading. Pruritus is generally absent.

In EM major, 50% of patients have prodromes similar to an influenzalike prodrome, including moderate fever, general discomfort, cough, sore throat, vomiting, chest pain, and diarrhea (secondary to gastrointestinal [GI] tract ulceration). These symptoms have a classic time course of development and are usually present for 1-14 days before the cutaneous eruption occurs. The lesions begin on the acral areas and spread similarly to the distribution of EM minor (ie, they are usually symmetrical and extend from the face and torso to the trunk and proximal extremities).

Prominent mucosal involvement may also occur in EM major. Erosions of the oral mucosa may result in difficulty in eating, drinking, or opening the mouth. Conjunctival involvement may cause lacrimation, photophobia, burning eyes, or visual impairment. Genital lesions are painful and may result in urinary retention; painful micturition due to genitourinary (GU) tract ulceration may also occur. Shortness of breath or difficulty in breathing may occur due to tracheobronchial epithelial involvement.

A localized form of EM has been reported at the site of marrow aspiration. About 50% of children with EM have a history of herpes labialis or genitalis. Although the onset of herpes usually precedes EM by 3-14 days, it may still be present at the onset of EM.

Physical Examination

The initial lesion is a dull-red purpuric macule or urticarial plaque that expands slightly to a maximum of 2 cm over 24-48 hours. In the center, a small papule, vesicle, or bulla develops, flattens, and then may clear. An intermediate ring develops and becomes raised, pale, and edematous. The periphery gradually changes to become cyanotic or violaceous and forms a typical concentric “target” lesion (see the image below).



View Image

Target lesion of erythema multiforme.

Some lesions consist of only two concentric rings. Polycyclic or arcuate lesions may occur (see the image below). Some lesions appear at areas of previous trauma (Koebner phenomenon). Postinflammatory hyperpigmentation or hypopigmentation may occur. The Nikolsky sign is negative (ie, the top layers of the skin do not slip away from the lower layers when slightly rubbed).



View Image

Raised atypical targets and arcuate lesions.

The lesions are symmetrical, predominantly on the acral extensor surfaces of the extremities, and they spread centripetally to involve the abdomen and back. Lesions may also coalesce and become generalized. The palms, neck, and face are frequently involved. Lesions of the soles and flexural aspects of the extremities are less common. A zosteriform distribution may be present.

Mucosal lesions

Mucosal lesions usually heal without sequelae. The mucosal involvement in Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) is more severe and more extensive than that of EM major. Generalized lymphadenopathy often accompanies EM major.

Other findings

Mild temperature elevation is usually noted. Hyperventilation and mild hypoxia may result from anxiety or tracheobronchial involvement.

Dehydration may range from mild to massive as a result of the following factors:

Complications

Most patients with EM have an uncomplicated course, with the exception of hosts who are immunocompromised and those with secondary bacterial infections of the skin or the mucosa. Healing of the mucosal areas is usually complete.

Scars and strictures of the esophageal, urethral, vaginal, and anal mucosa rarely occur. However, severe oral involvement may be accompanied by difficulty in consuming food and fluid and can result in dehydration. Vaginal and urethral erosions may cause urinary retention and phimosis. Hematocolpos is the result of genital lesions in teenage females. Severe scarring of the GU tract may cause vaginal and urethral stenosis.

Severe eye complications (eg, purulent conjunctivitis, anterior uveitis, panophthalmitis, scarring of the conjunctivae, and symblepharon) may occur in 20% of cases and may result in permanent blindness. Other ocular sequelae may include the following:

Additional potential complications include the following:

Approach Considerations

No specific laboratory tests are indicated to make the diagnosis of erythema multiforme (EM), which should be arrived at clinically. The clinical picture can guide laboratory testing in severe cases.

Cultures are indicated in severe cases and should be obtained from blood, sputum, and mucosal lesions.

No specific imaging studies are necessary in most cases, although chest radiography may be useful in cases with respiratory symptoms or signs, particularly if an underlying pulmonary infection is suspected.

Laboratory Studies

The complete blood count (CBC) with differential usually reveals moderate leukocytosis with atypical lymphocytes and lymphopenia, possibly secondary to the depletion of CD4 lymphocytes (90% of patients). An eosinophil count higher than 1000/μL may also be seen. Neutropenia (30% of patients) may occur and indicates a poor prognosis. A severely elevated total white blood cell (WBC) count indicates infection. Mild anemia may be present, and thrombocytopenia is found in 15% of patients.

Electrolyte values may be abnormal with severe skin and mucous membrane involvement due to fluid losses. These values are useful for guiding volume and electrolyte replacement therapy.

Blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and creatinine tests are indicated to screen for renal involvement and dehydration in severe cases necessitating hospitalization. Prerenal azotemia and elevated serum urea nitrogen levels may be found and indicate a poor prognosis.

Also in severe cases, the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) may be elevated, but this is a nonspecific finding. Mildly elevated liver transaminase levels may be found with hepatic involvement.

Specific herpes simplex virus (HSV) antigens have been detected within keratinocytes by means of immunofluorescence study. HSV DNA has been identified primarily within the keratinocytes by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification. Direct immunofluorescence staining and examination may also identify an alternative diagnosis (eg, pemphigoid or immunoglobulin A [IgA] linear dermatosis).

Procedures

A cutaneous punch biopsy may be performed to allow histopathologic examination to confirm the diagnosis of EM and rule out alternative diagnoses (see Differentials). A skin biopsy of the cutaneous lesions may also exclude the presence of other blistering disorders, such as in equivocal cases, particularly in the absence of target lesions.

Histologic Findings

Histologically, erythema multiforme is the prototypical vacuolar interface dermatitis showing a lymphocytic infiltrate along the dermoepidermal junction associated with hydropic changes and dyskeratosis of basal keratinocytes (see the image below). This vacuolar change represents individual or small groups of necrotic (apoptotic) keratinocytes. In addition, a characteristic sparse-to-moderate lymphocytic infiltrate is present around the superficial vascular plexuses.



View Image

Interface dermatitis with prominent dyskeratotic cells in epidermis.

As the lesions progress, partial-to-full-thickness epidermal necrosis, intraepidermal vesiculation, or subepidermal blisters may appear, owing to spongiosis and to the cellular damage of the basal layer of the epidermis. Occasionally, severe papillary edema is present. The dermal inflammatory infiltrate is characterized by high-density lichenoid infiltrate rich in T cells, composed of lymphocytes (CD4+ more abundant than CD8+ in the papillary dermis; CD8 T cells and macrophages predominant in the epidermis) and macrophages, with a few neutrophils and occasional eosinophils (particularly in those cases associated with medications).

Erythema multiforme vs SJS/TEN and SSSS

Histology and immunochemistry studies have shown that inflammatory infiltrates of EM and Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS)/toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) are strikingly different in density and nature. EM has a high density of cell infiltrate rich in T lymphocytes. By contrast, SJS/TEN is characterized by a cell-poor infiltrate of macrophages and dendrocytes with strong tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α immunoreactivity. Immune complex deposition is variable and nonspecific. In severe cases, fibrinoid necrosis can occur in the stomach, spleen, trachea, and bronchi.

Histologic examination of skin biopsies in staphylococcal scalded skin syndrome (SSSS) reveals cleavage of cell layers within the epidermis.

Approach Considerations

Mild cases of erythema multiforme (EM) require only symptomatic treatment in the emergency department (ED), which may include analgesics or nonsteroidal inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs); cold compresses with saline or Burrow solution; topical steroids; and soothing oral treatments (eg, saline gargles, viscous lidocaine, and diphenhydramine elixir).

In the severe cases of EM major, aggressive monitoring and replacement of fluids and electrolytes as necessary are of paramount importance. Supportive respiratory care, including suctioning and postural drainage, should be provided as necessary.

The cause of EM should be identified, if possible. If a drug is suspected, it must be withdrawn as soon as possible. This includes all medications begun during the preceding 2 months. All unnecessary medications should be discontinued.

Infections should be appropriately treated after cultures or serologic tests have been performed. The use of liquid antiseptics (eg, 0.05% chlorhexidine) during bathing helps prevent superinfection. Topical treatment, including that for genital involvement, may be performed with a gauze dressing or a hydrocolloid.

Local supportive care for eye involvement is important and includes topical lubricants for dry eyes, sweeping of conjunctival fornices, and removal of fresh adhesions.

Suppression of herpes simplex virus (HSV) can prevent HSV-associated EM, but antiviral treatment started after the eruption of EM has no effect on the course of EM.

Medical Care

Analgesics should be administered as needed to control pain, which may be severe. Topical corticosteroids are useful for outpatient treatment of patients with limited disease. Systemic corticosteroid therapy is controversial in EM, and some believe it may predispose to complications. If given, the course should be limited to 10 days to 2 weeks.

Prophylaxis for recurrence of herpes-associated EM (HAEM) should be considered in patients with more than five attacks per year. Oral acyclovir in a dosage of 200 mg qd to 400 mg bid can be effective for recurrence of HAEM, even in subclinical herpes simplex virus (HSV) infection.[30] In children, 10 mg/kg/day may be considered.[31]  Prophylaxis may be required for 6-12 months or longer. If the patient's condition is unresponsive, continuous therapy with valacyclovir (500 mg bid) has been reported to be effective.[32]  Famciclovir 250 mg bid has also been recommended.[1]

Alternative treatments for erythema multiforme include dapsone, antimalarials, azathioprine, cimetidine,[33] and thalidomide. Beneficial effects with hemodialysis, plasmapheresis, cyclosporin, immunoglobulin, levamisole, thalidomide, dapsone, apremilast,[34]  adalimumab,[35]  and cyclophosphamide have been documented in case reports.

Tamoxifen may prevent premenstrual erythema multiforme. For ocular involvement, artificial wetting solutions, antibiotic solutions, or ointments may be helpful.

Empiric antibiotics are indicated if clinical evidence of secondary infection exists. Prophylactic antibiotics are not recommended, because of the increased likelihood of selecting out resistant strains. However, prompt culturing should be obtained with evidence of infection and then appropriate selection of antimicrobial therapy based on culture and sensitivity results. Some authors recommend routine alternate-day skin biopsy for culture to distinguish simple skin colonization from true infectious invasion and to guide antimicrobial therapy.

Hospitalization

EM major may warrant hospitalization for the treatment of complications and sequelae (eg, in cases of severe mucous membrane involvement, impaired oral intake, dehydration, or secondary infection) and to manage the patient's fluid and electrolytes. The most severe cases should be managed in intensive care units (ICUs) or burn units.

If the initial treating facility does not have facilities or experienced individuals to care for critically ill burn patients, the patient should be transferred to a regional tertiary care medical center by the most rapid means available.

Care in a surgical specialty burn unit may provide the greatest likelihood of survival. Areas of denuded skin should be managed in much the same way as thermal burns, though debridement is best avoided while lesions are still progressing. Eroded areas may be bathed every day or every other day with saline or Burrow solution and dressed with nonadherent dressings.

HSV- or M pneumoniae–related EM should be treated as appropriate. Intravenous (IV) antibiotics may be necessary to treat secondary infections. Barrier isolation should be implemented to decrease the risk of infection.

All potentially causative drugs should be discontinued immediately.

During the healing process, which usually takes about 2 weeks, proper skin care is essential. Aseptic handling should be practiced and adhesive materials avoided. Topical agents such as 0.5% silver nitrate solution or 0.05% chlorhexidine solution should be used to cleanse the skin; they should be warmed before being applied. Silver sulfadiazine should not be used, because of its causative association with EM.

Once the patient has stabilized in the ICU or burn unit, the peak of disease progression has passed, and reepithelialization has begun, transfer to a regular surgical ward may be appropriate. Reepithelialization usually takes 10-14 days.

After the acute period of illness has passed and the patient has survived, mucous membrane sequelae may warrant surgical intervention.

Supportive measures

Fluid resuscitation and nutritional support

Several issues make nutritional support critical. A liquid diet and IV fluid therapy may be necessary.

Fluid and electrolytes may be lost through the disrupted skin barrier, and widespread painful oral erosions may make feeding difficult. In such cases, a soft, flexible feeding tube should be passed into the stomach or small bowel and appropriate feedings initiated. Oral antacids may be helpful for discrete oral ulcers.

Profuse diarrhea may result from gastrointestinal (GI) involvement, making oral or enteral feeding difficult. Parenteral nutrition may be appropriate. Increased energy expenditure (eg, from increased core body temperature) must be recognized and treated appropriately. Nitrogen balance and other nutritional parameters are useful for estimating nutritional needs and evaluating the efficacy of nutritional therapy.

Fluid and electrolyte resuscitation are approximately 66-75% of that required for a similarly sized burn wound. Warmed fluids should be administered through a peripheral IV angiocatheter at a site removed from the skin eruptions. Central venous access should be avoided if at all possible in order to decrease the risk of line infection. All catheters, whether peripheral or central, should be changed at regular intervals.

The adequacy of fluid resuscitation should be monitored by using a urinary bladder catheter. Minimum urine output for adults is 0.5 mL/kg/hr; for children, it is 1 mL/kg/hr.

Pulmonary support

Patients with tracheobronchial involvement may present with hyperventilation and mild hypoxemia. Careful monitoring and aggressive pulmonary support may lead to early detection and treatment of diffuse interstitial pneumonitis and thus prevent the development of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).

Other measures

Thermoregulation may be maintained by keeping the environmental temperature at 30-32°C, administering only warmed fluids, and making use of heating lamps or warming blankets.

The use of a pressure support surface, an air or gel mattress, or a specialty bed is recommended to prevent pressure sores. Antacids, proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), or histamine-2 blockers may be given to prevent stress ulceration.

Ssubcutaneous heparin may be administered to prevent the development of deep venous thrombosis (DVT).

Monitoring and Prevention

If the patient was hospitalized, the medical professional(s) who provided treatment during that time should see the patient regularly and provide symptomatic relief as needed. Such practitioners may include burn or trauma surgeons, ophthalmologists, nephrologists, infectious disease specialists, or gastroenterologists.

The affected skin should be protected from any pressure or shear forces. Otherwise, early institution of physical and occupational therapies is appropriate. To reduce the likelihood of developing hyperpigmentation, the patient should be advised to use sunscreens for 1 year after the incident has resolved.

Once EM due to a drug has been diagnosed, the patient should never be rechallenged with the same drug or any other drug of the same class or similar chemical structure. Chemically related compounds often share a common metabolic pathway that may be abnormal in the affected individual. Sulfonamide-containing ointments should also be avoided.

First-degree relatives of an affected patient have an increased risk of reactions to similar drugs.

Consultations

Consultation with one or more of the following specialists may be necessary:

Acyclovir (Zovirax)

Clinical Context: 

Famciclovir (Famvir)

Clinical Context: 

Valacyclovir (Valtrex)

Clinical Context: 

What is erythema multiforme (EM)?What are the signs and symptoms of erythema multiforme (EM) minor?What are the signs and symptoms of erythema multiforme (EM) major?What is the consensus classification of erythema multiforme (EM) and Steven-Johnson syndrome?What is the pathophysiology of erythema multiforme (EM)?What evidence supports a cell-mediated immune reaction pathogenesis for erythema multiforme (EM)?What is the role of HSV in the pathogenesis of erythema multiforme (EM)?What is the role of drug hypersensitivity in the pathogenesis of erythema multiforme (EM)?Which viral infections cause erythema multiforme (EM)?What causes erythema multiforme (EM)?What is the most common cause of erythema multiforme (EM) in children?Which bacterial infections cause erythema multiforme (EM)?Which fungal and parasitic infections cause erythema multiforme (EM)?Which medications can cause erythema multiforme (EM)?Which antibiotics can cause erythema multiforme (EM)?Which antituberculoid agents can cause erythema multiforme (EM)?Other than antibiotics and antituberculoids, which medications cause erythema multiforme (EM)?What substances can cause erythema multiforme (EM) upon direct contract?What are less common causes of erythema multiforme (EM)?What is the incidence of erythema multiforme (EM) in the US and globally?How does the incidence of erythema multiforme (EM) vary between males and females and among different age groups?Which medical conditions increase the risk of developing erythema multiforme (EM)?What is the prognosis of erythema multiforme (EM) minor?What is the prognosis of erythema multiforme (EM) major?What are poor prognostic factors for erythema multiforme (EM)?What are the manifestations of continuous or persistent erythema multiforme (EM)?What information about erythema multiforme (EM) should patients receive?What should be the focus of the history for suspected erythema multiforme (EM)?What are the prodromal symptoms of erythema multiforme (EM) minor?What are the prodromal symptoms of erythema multiforme (EM) major?What are possible mucosal symptoms of erythema multiforme (EM) major?What history is common in children with erythema multiforme (EM)?What is the hallmark of erythema multiforme (EM)?How are skin lesions characterized in erythema multiforme (EM)?How are skin lesions distributed in erythema multiforme (EM)?What are the characteristics of mucosal lesions in erythema multiforme (EM)?What are nonspecific physical exam findings of erythema multiforme (EM)?What causes dehydration in patients with erythema multiforme (EM)?Which conditions complicate the course of erythema multiforme (EM)?What are possible complications of erythema multiforme (EM) lesions?What are ophthalmologic complications of erythema multiforme (EM)?What are systemic complications of erythema multiforme (EM)?What factors improve survival in erythema multiforme (EM)?What measures should be taken if adverse drug reactions are suspected as a cause of erythema multiforme (EM)?Which other conditions should be considered in the evaluation of suspected erythema multiforme (EM)?What are the differential diagnoses for Erythema Multiforme?What is the role of lab testing in the workup of erythema multiforme (EM)?When are cultures indicated in the workup of erythema multiforme (EM)?What is the role of imaging studies in the diagnosis of erythema multiforme (EM)?Which complete blood count (CBC) results are characteristic of erythema multiforme (EM)?What is the role of electrolyte values in the workup of erythema multiforme (EM)?When are BUN and creatinine tests indicated in the workup of erythema multiforme (EM)?What is the role of erythrocyte sedimentation (ESR) in the workup of erythema multiforme (EM)?What is the role of immunofluorescence study and PCR amplification in the evaluation of erythema multiforme (EM)?What is the role of histopathologic testing in the workup of erythema multiforme (EM)?Which histologic findings are characteristic of erythema multiforme (EM)?How are histology and immunochemistry used to differentiate erythema multiforme (EM) from Steven-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis (SJS/TEN)?What are the treatment options for erythema multiforme (EM)?Why should all medications be discontinued during the treatment of erythema multiforme (EM)?How are infections of erythema multiforme (EM) lesions treated?What is the treatment for eye involvement in erythema multiforme (EM)?What can prevent herpes simplex virus (HSV)-associated erythema multiforme (EM)?When are topical corticosteroids indicated in the treatment of erythema multiforme (EM)?When is prophylaxis for recurrence of herpes-associated erythema multiforme (HAEM) indicated?How is premenstrual erythema multiforme (EM) prevented?What is the role of antibiotics in the prevention and management of erythema multiforme (EM)?When is hospitalization indicated in patients with erythema multiforme (EM)?When is transfer indicated for patients with erythema multiforme (EM)?Which treatment provides the greatest likelihood of survival in severe erythema multiforme (EM)?What is the inpatient treatment for herpes simplex virus (HSV) or M pneumoniae-related erythema multiforme (EM)?What is the duration of inpatient treatment for erythema multiforme (EM)?When is fluid resuscitation and nutritional support indicated for the treatment of erythema multiforme (EM)?How is fluid resuscitation and nutritional support administered in the treatment of erythema multiforme (EM)?When is pulmonary support indicated in the treatment of erythema multiforme (EM)?What inpatient supportive care should be provided in the treatment of erythema multiforme (EM)?How should patients treated for erythema multiforme (EM) be monitored?What is the treatment for erythema multiforme (EM) caused by medications?Which specialist consultations may be needed for diagnosis and management of erythema multiforme (EM)?How are mild cases of erythema multiforme (EM) treated?What is the focus of treatment for severe cases of erythema multiforme (EM) major?What does emergency care of erythema multiforme (EM) include?What is the role of systemic corticosteroids in the treatment of erythema multiforme (EM)?When should prophylaxis for recurrence of herpes-associated erythema multiforme (HAEM) be considered?What are alternative medications for erythema multiforme (EM)?What are the treatment options for ocular involvement in erythema multiforme (EM)?How is antimicrobial therapy selected in erythema multiforme (EM)?Which medications in the drug class Antivirals, HSV are used in the treatment of Erythema Multiforme?

Author

Jose A Plaza, MD, Director of Dermatopathology, Professor of Pathology and Dermatology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Victor G Prieto, MD, PhD, Ferenc and Phyllis Gyorkey Chair for Research and Education in Pathology, Professor, Departments of Pathology and Dermatology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

Disclosure: Serve(d) as a director, officer, partner, employee, advisor, consultant or trustee for: Myriad / Castle (consultant regarding MyPath test in melanocytic lesions); Orlucent (consultant); .

Chief Editor

William D James, MD, Emeritus Professor, Department of Dermatology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine

Disclosure: Received income in an amount equal to or greater than $250 from: Elsevier<br/>Served as a speaker for various universities, dermatology societies, and dermatology departments.

Acknowledgements

Burke A Cunha, MD Professor of Medicine, State University of New York School of Medicine at Stony Brook; Chief, Infectious Disease Division, Winthrop-University Hospital

Burke A Cunha, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Chest Physicians, American College of Physicians, and Infectious Diseases Society of America

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Steven C Dronen, MD, FAAEM Chair, Department of Emergency Medicine, LeConte Medical Center

Steven C Dronen, MD, FAAEM is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Emergency Medicine and Society for Academic Emergency Medicine

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

James Foster, MD, MS Consulting Staff, Department of Emergency Medicine, Palomar Pomerado Health

James Foster, MD, MS is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American College of Emergency Physicians, and Phi Beta Kappa

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Warren R Heymann, MD Head, Division of Dermatology, Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey-New Jersey Medical School

Warren R Heymann, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Dermatology, American Society of Dermatopathology, and Society for Investigative Dermatology

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Jeffrey Lee Kishiyama, MD Assistant Clinical Professor of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, School of Medicine; Consulting Staff, Allergy and Asthma Associates of Santa Clara Valley Research Center

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Olufunmilayo Ogundele, MD Clinical Assistant Instructor, Staff Physician, Departments of Emergency and Internal Medicine, State University of New York Downstate, Kings County Hospital Center

Olufunmilayo Ogundele, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Medical Association and Society for Academic Emergency Medicine

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chulabhorn Pruksachatkunakorn, MD Chief, Division of Dermatology, Professor, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Thailand

Chulabhorn Pruksachatkunakorn is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Dermatology, International Society of Pediatric Dermatology, and Society for Pediatric Dermatology

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Don R Revis Jr, MD Consulting Staff, Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Florida College of Medicine

Don R Revis Jr, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Surgeons, American Medical Association, American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, and American Society of Plastic Surgeons

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Mark A Silverberg, MD, MMB, FACEP Assistant Professor, Associate Residency Director, Department of Emergency Medicine, State University of New York Downstate College of Medicine; Consulting Staff, Department of Emergency Medicine, Staten Island University Hospital, Kings County Hospital, University Hospital, State University of New York Downstate Medical Center

Mark A Silverberg, MD, MMB, FACEP is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Emergency Physicians, American Medical Association, Council of Emergency Medicine Residency Directors, and Society for Academic Emergency Medicine

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Debra Slapper, MD Consulting Staff, Department of Emergency Medicine, St Anthony's Hospital

Debra Slapper, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Emergency Medicine

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Michael J Wells, MD Associate Professor, Department of Dermatology, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Paul L Foster School of Medicine

Michael J Wells, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Academy of Dermatology, American Medical Association, and Texas Medical Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

References

  1. Soares A, Sokumbi O. Recent Updates in the Treatment of Erythema Multiforme. Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Sep 1. 57 (9):[View Abstract]
  2. Hao M, Zang P, Miller M, Cutler L, Worswick S. Herpes associated erythema multiforme: A retrospective study. Am J Emerg Med. 2020 Dec. 38 (12):2761.e1-2761.e3. [View Abstract]
  3. Schofield JK, Tatnall FM, Brown J, McCloskey D, Navarrete C, Leigh IM. Recurrent erythema multiforme: tissue typing in a large series of patients. Br J Dermatol. 1994 Oct. 131 (4):532-5. [View Abstract]
  4. Kämpgen E, Burg G, Wank R. Association of herpes simplex virus-induced erythema multiforme with the human leukocyte antigen DQw3. Arch Dermatol. 1988 Sep. 124 (9):1372-5. [View Abstract]
  5. Martire B, Foti C, Cassano N, Buquicchio R, Del Vecchio GC, De Mattia D. Persistent B-cell lymphopenia, multiorgan disease, and erythema multiforme caused by Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection. Pediatr Dermatol. 2005 Nov-Dec. 22 (6):558-60. [View Abstract]
  6. Grosber M, Alexandre M, Poszepczynska-Guigné E, Revuz J, Roujeau JC. Recurrent erythema multiforme in association with recurrent Mycoplasma pneumoniae infections. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2007 May. 56 (5 Suppl):S118-9. [View Abstract]
  7. Wu CC, Tsai CN, Wong WR, Hong HS, Chuang YH. Early congenital syphilis and erythema multiforme-like bullous targetoid lesions in a 1-day-old newborn: detection of Treponema pallidum genomic DNA from the targetoid plaque using nested polymerase chain reaction. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2006 Aug. 55 (2 Suppl):S11-5. [View Abstract]
  8. Pavlović MD, Karadaglić DM, Kandolf LO, Mijusković ZP. Persistent erythema multiforme: a report of three cases. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2001 Jan. 15 (1):54-8. [View Abstract]
  9. Saleh W, Alharbi H, Cha S. Increased prevalence of erythema multiforme in patients with COVID-19 infection or vaccination. Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 2. 14 (1):2801. [View Abstract]
  10. Wu PC, Huang IH, Wang CW, Chung WH, Chen CB. Erythema Multiforme and Epidermal Necrolysis Following COVID-19 Vaccines: A Systematic Review. Dermatitis. 2024 Aug 22. [View Abstract]
  11. Carducci M, Latini A, Acierno F, Amantea A, Capitanio B, Santucci B. Erythema multiforme during cytomegalovirus infection and oral therapy with terbinafine: a virus-drug interaction. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2004 Mar. 18 (2):201-3. [View Abstract]
  12. González-Delgado P, Blanes M, Soriano V, Montoro D, Loeda C, Niveiro E. Erythema multiforme to amoxicillin with concurrent infection by Epstein-Barr virus. Allergol Immunopathol (Madr). 2006 Mar-Apr. 34 (2):76-8. [View Abstract]
  13. Mockenhaupt M, Viboud C, Dunant A, Naldi L, Halevy S, Bouwes Bavinck JN, et al. Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis: assessment of medication risks with emphasis on recently marketed drugs. The EuroSCAR-study. J Invest Dermatol. 2008 Jan. 128 (1):35-44. [View Abstract]
  14. Nettis E, Giordano D, Pierluigi T, Ferrannini A, Tursi A. Erythema multiforme-like rash in a patient sensitive to ofloxacin. Acta Derm Venereol. 2002. 82 (5):395-6. [View Abstract]
  15. de Arruda JA, Silva P, Amaral MB, Cotta F, Avendanho R, Mesquita R. Erythema multiforme induced by alendronate sodium in a geriatric patient: A case report and review of the literature. J Clin Exp Dent. 2017 Jul. 9 (7):e929-e933. [View Abstract]
  16. Matsuzawa Y, Fujishima S, Nakada T, Iijima M. Erythema multiforme major putatively induced by dihydrocodeine phosphate. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2010 Aug. 35 (6):673-4. [View Abstract]
  17. Thami GP, Kaur S, Kanwar AJ. Erythema multiforme due to griseofulvin with positive re-exposure test. Dermatology. 2001. 203 (1):84-5. [View Abstract]
  18. Yanes DA, Kaffenberger JA, Carr DR. Erythema multiforme as a reaction to imiquimod 5% cream. Dermatol Online J. 2017 Feb 15. 23 (2):[View Abstract]
  19. Nomura H, Takahashi H, Suzuki S, Kurihara Y, Chubachi S, Kawada I, et al. Unexpected recalcitrant course of drug-induced erythema multiforme-like eruption and interstitial pneumonia sequentially occurring after nivolumab therapy. J Dermatol. 2017 Jul. 44 (7):818-821. [View Abstract]
  20. Vivar KL, Deschaine M, Messina J, Divine JM, Rabionet A, Patel N, et al. Epidermal programmed cell death-ligand 1 expression in TEN associated with nivolumab therapy. J Cutan Pathol. 2017 Apr. 44 (4):381-384. [View Abstract]
  21. Conforti C, Currado D, Vezzoni R, Corneli P, Bussani R, Navarini L, et al. Erythema Multiforme Induced by Secukinumab: Clinical, Dermoscopic, and Histological Features. J Clin Rheumatol. 2021 Aug 1. 27 (5):e177-e178. [View Abstract]
  22. Sánchez-González MJ, Barbarroja-Escudero J, Antolín-Amérigo D, Rodríguez-Rodríguez M, Pericet Fernández L, Medina I, et al. Erythema Multiforme Induced by Tramadol: An Allergy Assessment. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2020. 30 (4):290-291. [View Abstract]
  23. Caro-Gutiérrez D, Floristán Muruzábal MU, Gómez de la Fuente E, Franco AP, López Estebaranz JL. Photo-induced erythema multiforme associated with vandetanib administration. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014 Oct. 71 (4):e142-4. [View Abstract]
  24. Hong SJ, Chang CH. Erythema multiforme-like generalized allergic contact dermatitis caused by Alpinia galanga. Contact Dermatitis. 2006 Feb. 54 (2):118-20. [View Abstract]
  25. Werchniak AE, Schwarzenberger K. Poison ivy: an underreported cause of erythema multiforme. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2004 Nov. 51 (5 Suppl):S159-60. [View Abstract]
  26. Cohen DM, Bhattacharyya I. Cinnamon-induced oral erythema multiformelike sensitivity reaction. J Am Dent Assoc. 2000 Jul. 131 (7):929-34. [View Abstract]
  27. Mayumi M, Heike T, Mikawa H. Transient selective C4 deficiency of infancy. Lancet. 1992 Mar 21. 339 (8795):752. [View Abstract]
  28. Lam NS, Yang YH, Wang LC, Lin YT, Chiang BL. Clinical characteristics of childhood erythema multiforme, Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis in Taiwanese children. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2004 Dec. 37 (6):366-70. [View Abstract]
  29. Aydogan K, Karadogan S, Balaban Adim S, Tunali S. Lupus erythematosus associated with erythema multiforme: report of two cases and review of the literature. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2005 Sep. 19 (5):621-7. [View Abstract]
  30. Shinde SB, Lohe V, Mohod S. Herpes Simplex Virus (HSV)-Induced Erythema Multiforme: A Rare Case Report. Cureus. 2024 Jun. 16 (6):e62650. [View Abstract]
  31. Goldman RD. Erythema multiforme in children. Can Fam Physician. 2022 Jul. 68 (7):507-508. [View Abstract]
  32. Kerob D, Assier-Bonnet H, Esnault-Gelly P, Blanc F, Saiag P. Recurrent erythema multiforme unresponsive to acyclovir prophylaxis and responsive to valacyclovir continuous therapy. Arch Dermatol. 1998 Jul. 134 (7):876-7. [View Abstract]
  33. Kürkçüoğlu N, Alli N. Cimetidine prevents recurrent erythema multiforme major resulting from herpes simplex virus infection. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1989 Oct. 21 (4 Pt 1):814-5. [View Abstract]
  34. Chen T, Levitt J, Geller L. Apremilast for treatment of recurrent erythema multiforme. Dermatol Online J. 2017 Jan 15. 23 (1):[View Abstract]
  35. Baillis B, Maize JC Sr. Treatment of recurrent erythema multiforme with adalimumab as monotherapy. JAAD Case Rep. 2017 Mar. 3 (2):95-97. [View Abstract]
  36. Khafaga YM, Jamshed A, Allam AA, Mourad WA, Ezzat A, Al Eisa A, et al. Stevens-Johnson syndrome in patients on phenytoin and cranial radiotherapy. Acta Oncol. 1999. 38 (1):111-6. [View Abstract]

Target lesion of erythema multiforme.

Raised atypical targets and arcuate lesions.

Target lesion of erythema multiforme.

Raised atypical targets and arcuate lesions.

Interface dermatitis with prominent dyskeratotic cells in epidermis.

Target lesion of erythema multiforme.

Raised atypical targets and arcuate lesions.

Hemorrhagic crusts on the lips.

Interface dermatitis with prominent dyskeratotic cells in epidermis.