Pacemaker Malfunction

Back

Background

An accurate diagnosis of pacing system malfunction(s) requires knowledge of different modes, timing cycles, and event markers, as well as newer algorithms, particularly as the number of pacemaker implants continues to grow because of newer indications. There are a few million pacemaker patients worldwide, with hundreds of thousands of new implants yearly.

Pathophysiology

The pacing system consists of a pulse generator and transvenous or epicardial lead(s) that connect the generator to the myocardium. Although true pulse generator failure is very rare, pacing system malfunction occurs occasionally. Pacing system malfunction can be due to malfunction of lead, electrode-tissue interface, or pulse generator. More complications with lead malfunction occur compared to pulse generator malfunctions.[1]

Most of these malfunctions can be corrected by simple reprogramming of the device. The majority of malfunctions are in fact due to normal programmed pacemaker function. A thorough understanding of the cause of malfunction is extremely important for accurate diagnosis and management.

Etiology

Causes of pacing system malfunction can be classified into the following groups:

A systematic review and meta-analysis comprising eight studies with a total of 14,579 leads found that leads associated with one specific manufacturer had an increased risk of abnormalities compared with leads from other manufacturers.[2]  These anomalies were mostly lead noise with normal impedance, and there was a higher risk of lead reprogramming and lead revision or extraction. Leads from this manufacturer connected to generators from the same manufacturer had the highest rates of abnormalities, followed by leads from the manufacturer connected to other manufacturers' generators, and other manufacturers' leads connected to this manufacturer's generators.[2]

Undersensing

The pacing system's function of sensing is a complex process that allows the pacemaker to detect intrinsic atrial or ventricular cardiac activity based on which chamber the lead is located. True undersensing occurs when the pacemaker fails to detect native cardiac activity.

Causes of undersensing include the following:

The images below illustrate undersensing.



View Image

Pacemaker Malfunction. Atrial undersensing. The rhythm strip shows an atrial pacing artifact after the intrinsic P wave.



View Image

Pacemaker Malfunction. Ventricular undersensing. The rhythm strip shows ventricular pacing artifacts despite normal underlying ventricular activity.

Oversensing

Oversensing occurs when the pacemaker detects inappropriate electrical activity as appropriate intrinsic cardiac activity.

Causes of oversensing are discussed below.

Pacemaker crosstalk: Pacemaker generated electrical event in one chamber is sensed by the lead in another chamber, which results in inappropriate inhibition of pacing artifact in the second chamber. Crosstalk is only seen in dual chamber or biventricular pacemakers. Also called crosstalk inhibition, far-field sensing, or self-inhibition. Note the following:

Electromagnetic interference (EMI): (See the discussion above in the Undersensing section.)

Improper programming: Programming the lead sensitivity too low may cause oversensing.

Myopotential inhibition: Oversensing of the skeletal muscle electrical activity causes temporary inhibition of the pacemaker with no pacing current.

Noise from pacemaker lead fracture: Due to oversensing of the lead noise, there is inappropriate inhibition of the pacemaker.

The following image illustrates oversensing.



View Image

Pacemaker Malfunction. This is a typical example of ventricular oversensing with inhibition of ventricular pacing. In ventricular noncapture, a ventri....

Loss of capture (noncapture)

Loss of capture, also known as noncapture, occurs when there is failure of the pacing system to produce electrical activation and myocardial contraction. Diagnosis is made when the presence of an electrical stimulus is not followed by the expected P wave or QRS complex.

Causes of loss of capture include the following:

The images below illustrate loss of capture.



View Image

Pacemaker Malfunction. Ventricular noncapture. The rhythm strip shows atrial (P wave) sensing followed by a ventricular spike, which failed to capture....



View Image

Pacemaker Malfunction. Loss of atrial capture. The rhythm strip shows intermittent loss of atrial capture.

Loss of output (no pacer artifact and no QRS)

Causes of loss of output include the following:

Failure to output

Causes of failure to output include the following:

Inappropriate rate

Causes of inappropriate rate include the following:

Inappropriate lead position

Causes of inappropriate position include the following:

Inappropriate mode

Causes of inappropriate mode include the following:

Extracardiac stimulation

Causes of extracardiac stimulation include the following:

True pulse generator failure

Causes of true pulse generator failure include the following:

Pacemaker-mediated tachycardia (PMT)

PMT (see image below) is observed in dual-chamber pacemakers with DDD, VDD, and DDDR modes. Causes of PMT include endless-loop tachycardia, maximum tracking rate during atrial arrhythmias, sensor-driven tachycardia, myopotential tracking, and runaway pacemaker.



View Image

Pacemaker Malfunction. Pacemaker-mediated tachycardia. The rhythm strip shows ventricular pacing at 110 beats per minute (programmed maximal track rat....

Note the following:

Pacemaker syndrome (PS)

PS is usually observed with ventricular pacing (eg, usually VOO, VVI, VVIR modes and, sometimes, VDD mode) because of atrial contraction against the closed AV valves during ventricular pacing. Note the following:

Twiddler syndrome

Twiddler syndrome refers to patient manipulation of the pulse generator within the pocket, resulting in coiling of the lead, lead dislodgment, or rotation and/or reversal of the anterior and posterior surfaces of the pulse generator. Note the following:

Epidemiology

Maisel reported a pacemaker generator failure rate of 0.46% based on US Food and Drug Administration reports,[5]  as well as 1.3 malfunctions per 1000 person-years based on device registries.[6]  The actual incidence of pacemaker malfunction, however, is estimated to be higher as these numbers are exclusive of lead failure. Hauser et al reported a 2% device electronic failure rate at their center.[7]

The global incidence of pacemaker malfunction is unknown and difficult to determine given inconsistent definitions and the absence of a comprehensive reporting system.

Prognosis

Prognosis of pacemaker malfunction depends on the underlying cause of the pacemaker failure. Most of the pacing system malfunctions are benign and can be corrected with appropriate reprogramming.

Morbidity/mortality

Overall morbidity and mortality depend on the underlying cause of the pacemaker malfunction as well as the patient's dependency on the pacemaker. Most pacing system malfunctions are benign, although conditions such as crosstalk inhibition or runaway pacemaker can be life threatening. Maisel reported a 1 in 75,000 death rate among pacer implants.[6]

Complications

Complications during pulse generator change and lead insertion or extraction include the following:

Patient Education

At the time of device implantation, educate patients regarding postimplantation care. Additionally, periodically remind patients about signs and symptoms that may be related to pacing system malfunction and would warrant medical attention.

Patient education is needed for optimal pacemaker function and early diagnosis of malfunction and includes the following:

History and Physical Examination

History

Clinical symptoms of pacemaker malfunction are variable and include syncope, dizziness, palpitations, and slow or fast heart rate. Extracardiac stimulation or hiccup may be present. Obtain as much information as possible regarding the pulse generator, leads, and programmed values. Information on time of initial device placement, indication for pacemaker implant, special programming features particular to that model or patient, any recent surgeries, and knowledge of any manufacturer recalls or alerts on pacing systems may provide clues to the underlying malfunction.

Physical examination

Look for the following signs in patients with pacing system malfunction:

Laboratory Studies

The following laboratory studies may be useful in cases of pacemaker malfunction:

Imaging Studies

The following imaging studies may be considered in cases of pacemaker malfunction:

Other Tests

Several other studies may be indicated in cases of pacemaker malfunction. Consider the following:

Medical Care

Medical therapy has a limited role in pacemaker malfunction. In case of abnormal thresholds, correct electrolyte and metabolic abnormalities (eg, hypokalemia, hyperkalemia, or hypomagnesemia), and adjust medication doses or withhold the medication as needed. Also, note the following:

Additional inpatient care may include the following:

Activity

To minimize risk of lead dislodgment, advise patients not to raise the ipsilateral arm over and above the shoulder for approximately 2 weeks after implantation of the lead.

Consultations

Consider consultations with the following specialists:

Surgical Care

Surgical care depends on underlying cause for pacing malfunction. Note the following:

In 2013, the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association and the Heart Rhythm Society jointly issued guidelines for device-based therapy of cardiac rhythm abnormalities.[12]

In the multicenter European Heart Rhythm Association survey which used a questionnaire to evaluate management strategies for malfunctioning and recalled pacemaker and defibrillator leads across Europe, investigators found 85% of responding centers performed lead extraction.[13] Primary factors in decision making were the patient's age, the presence of damaged leads, and the lead dwelling time.

In a study that retrospectively reviewed the outcomes of the transvenous extraction of superfluous leads of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices, Huang et al found that this procedure is highly successful. They reviewed transvenous lead extraction procedures performed at the Mayo Clinic, including 123 procedures to remove 167 superfluous functional or nonfunctional leads. The procedural complete-success rate for the removal of superfluous leads was 97%.[14]

Long-Term Monitoring

Most cases of pacemaker malfunction require only follow-up device interrogation and chest radiography. Encourage patients to regularly follow-up with their cardiologist and/or electrophysiologist for device monitoring. If applicable, patients should participate in remote-device monitoring in set time intervals.

Author

Priyanka Ghosh, DO, Fellow in Cardiovascular Disease, Guthrie Robert Packer Hospital

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Saurabh Sharma, MD, FACC, FACP, FASE, RPVI, Associate Non-Invasive Cardiologist, Director, Cardiovascular Prevention and Lipid Clinic, Program Director, Internal Medicine Residency Program, Guthrie Medical Group, Guthrie Robert Packer Hospital; Clinical Assistant Professor of Cardiology, Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editors

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD, Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Received salary from Medscape for employment. for: Medscape.

Brian Olshansky, MD, FESC, FAHA, FACC, FHRS, Professor Emeritus of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa College of Medicine

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Jose M Dizon, MD, Professor of Clinical Medicine, Clinical Electrophysiology Laboratory, Division of Cardiology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons; Attending Physician, Department of Medicine, New York-Presbyterian/Columbia University Medical Center

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Additional Contributors

Chakri Yarlagadda, MD, FACC, FSCAI, FASNC, CCDS, Director of Cardiac Rehabilitation, St Elizabeth Youngstown Hospital; Radiation Safety Officer, Mercy Health Cardiology

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

Terry Carle, PAC (Johnson City, Tennessee) for his exemplary teaching during fellowship.

References

  1. Liaquat MT, Ahmed I, Alzahrani T. Pacemaker malfunction. StatPearls [Internet]. 2022 Jan. [View Abstract]
  2. Khatiwala RV, Mullins E, Fan D, Srivatsa UN, Dhruva SS, Oesterle A. Electrical abnormalities with St. Jude/Abbott pacing leads: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Heart Rhythm. 2021 Dec. 18 (12):2061-9. [View Abstract]
  3. Prasitlumkum N, Ding K, Doyle K, Pai RG, Lo R. An unprecedented cause of cardiac resynchronization with defibrillator (CRT-D) malfunction "A beheaded generator assembly". J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2022 Apr. 33 (4):769-72. [View Abstract]
  4. Sabbagh E, Abdelfattah T, Karim MM, Farah A, Grubb B, Karim S. Causes of failure to capture in pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. J Innov Card Rhythm Manag. 2020 Feb. 11(2):4013-7. [View Abstract]
  5. Maisel WH, Moynahan M, Zuckerman BD, et al. Pacemaker and ICD generator malfunctions: analysis of Food and Drug Administration annual reports. JAMA. 2006 Apr 26. 295(16):1901-6. [View Abstract]
  6. Maisel WH. Pacemaker and ICD generator reliability: meta-analysis of device registries. JAMA. 2006 Apr 26. 295(16):1929-34. [View Abstract]
  7. Hauser RG, Hayes DL, Kallinen LM, et al. Clinical experience with pacemaker pulse generators and transvenous leads: an 8-year prospective multicenter study. Heart Rhythm. 2007 Feb. 4(2):154-60. [View Abstract]
  8. Johansen JB, Jorgensen OD, Moller M, et al. Infection after pacemaker implantation: infection rates and risk factors associated with infection in a population-based cohort study of 46299 consecutive patients. Eur Heart J. 2011 Apr. 32(8):991-8. [View Abstract]
  9. Managed ventricular pacing: cardiac device features. Medtronic. February 2017. Available at https://www.medtronic.com/us-en/healthcare-professionals/therapies-procedures/cardiac-rhythm/cardiac-device-features/pacemaker-features/managed-ventricular-pacing.html. Accessed: September 22, 2021.
  10. Amin MS, Matchar DB, Wood MA, Ellenbogen KA. Management of recalled pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: a decision analysis model. JAMA. 2006 Jul 26. 296(4):412-20. [View Abstract]
  11. Lewis RK, Pokorney SD, Greenfield RA, et al. Preprocedural ECG-gated computed tomography for prevention of complications during lead extraction. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2014 Oct. 37(10):1297-305. [View Abstract]
  12. [Guideline] Epstein AE, DiMarco JP, Ellenbogen KA, et al. 2012 ACCF/AHA/HRS focused update incorporated into the ACCF/AHA/HRS 2008 guidelines for device-based therapy of cardiac rhythm abnormalities: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Jan 22. 61(3):e6-75. [View Abstract]
  13. Grazia Bongiorni M, Dagres N, Estner H, Pison L, Todd D, Blomstrom-Lundqvist C. Management of malfunctioning and recalled pacemaker and defibrillator leads: results of the European Heart Rhythm Association survey. Europace. 2014 Nov. 16(11):1674-8. [View Abstract]
  14. Huang XM, Fu H, Osborn MJ, et al. Extraction of superfluous device leads: A comparison with removal of infected leads. Heart Rhythm. 2015 Jun. 12(6):1177-82. [View Abstract]

Pacemaker Malfunction. Atrial lead dislodgment. The chest radiograph film detail shows a dislodged atrial lead with the tip in the right ventricular cavity.

Pacemaker Malfunction. This image shows an artifact due to monitor malfunction or a loose limb lead connection. An abrupt loss of a portion of the QRS complex followed by a flat line can be observed. If R-R intervals are matched, two QRS complexes are missing during the pause. If the artifact is due to a dislodged lead, a pacing artifact with no capture should be observed.

Pacemaker Malfunction. Atrial undersensing. The rhythm strip shows an atrial pacing artifact after the intrinsic P wave.

Pacemaker Malfunction. Ventricular undersensing. The rhythm strip shows ventricular pacing artifacts despite normal underlying ventricular activity.

Pacemaker Malfunction. This is a typical example of ventricular oversensing with inhibition of ventricular pacing. In ventricular noncapture, a ventricular pacing artifact should be present after the third P wave.

Pacemaker Malfunction. Ventricular noncapture. The rhythm strip shows atrial (P wave) sensing followed by a ventricular spike, which failed to capture the ventricle.

Pacemaker Malfunction. Loss of atrial capture. The rhythm strip shows intermittent loss of atrial capture.

Pacemaker Malfunction. Pacemaker-mediated tachycardia. The rhythm strip shows ventricular pacing at 110 beats per minute (programmed maximal track rate).

Pacemaker Malfunction. Termination of pacemaker-mediated tachycardia (PMT). Automatic postventricular atrial refractory period (PVARP) extension terminated the PMT.

Pacemaker Malfunction. Atrial undersensing. The rhythm strip shows an atrial pacing artifact after the intrinsic P wave.

Pacemaker Malfunction. Ventricular undersensing. The rhythm strip shows ventricular pacing artifacts despite normal underlying ventricular activity.

Pacemaker Malfunction. Atrial lead dislodgment. The chest radiograph film detail shows a dislodged atrial lead with the tip in the right ventricular cavity.

Pacemaker Malfunction. Ventricular noncapture. The rhythm strip shows atrial (P wave) sensing followed by a ventricular spike, which failed to capture the ventricle.

Pacemaker Malfunction. Loss of atrial capture. The rhythm strip shows intermittent loss of atrial capture.

Pacemaker Malfunction. Pacemaker-mediated tachycardia. The rhythm strip shows ventricular pacing at 110 beats per minute (programmed maximal track rate).

Pacemaker Malfunction. Termination of pacemaker-mediated tachycardia (PMT). Automatic postventricular atrial refractory period (PVARP) extension terminated the PMT.

Pacemaker Malfunction. This image shows an artifact due to monitor malfunction or a loose limb lead connection. An abrupt loss of a portion of the QRS complex followed by a flat line can be observed. If R-R intervals are matched, two QRS complexes are missing during the pause. If the artifact is due to a dislodged lead, a pacing artifact with no capture should be observed.

Pacemaker Malfunction. This is a typical example of ventricular oversensing with inhibition of ventricular pacing. In ventricular noncapture, a ventricular pacing artifact should be present after the third P wave.