Coxsackieviruses

Back

Background

Coxsackieviruses belong to the family Picornaviridae and the genus Enterovirus, which also includes poliovirus and echovirus.[1] Enteroviruses are among the most common and important human pathogens with 9 different species classified(Enterovirus A-H and I).[2]  Enterovirus C includes poliovirus 1-3, whereas Enterovirus A, B, and C include the numbered coxsackieviruses. Coxsackieviruses share many characteristics with poliovirus. With control of poliovirus infections in much of the world, more attention has been focused on understanding the nonpolio enteroviruses such as coxsackieviruses.

Coxsackieviruses are nonenveloped viruses with linear single-stranded RNA.[1] Coxsackieviruses are divided into group A and group B viruses based on early observations of their pathogenicity in mice. Group A coxsackieviruses were noted to cause a flaccid paralysis that was caused by generalized myositis, whereas group B coxsackieviruses were noted to cause a spastic paralysis due to focal muscle injury and degeneration of neuronal, pancreatic, and myocardial tissue. At least 23 serotypes (1-22, 24) of group A and 6 serotypes (1-6) of group B are recognized.

In general, group A coxsackieviruses tend to infect the skin and mucous membranes, causing herpangina, acute hemorrhagic conjunctivitis (AHC), and hand-foot-and-mouth (HFM) disease. Group B coxsackieviruses tend to infect the heart, pleura, pancreas, and liver, causing pleurodynia, myocarditis, pericarditis, and hepatitis. Both group A and group B coxsackieviruses can cause nonspecific febrile illnesses, rashes, upper respiratory tract disease, and aseptic meningitis.

Numerous group A coxsackieviruses are responsible for causing CNS disease similar to poliomyelitis. Systemic neonatal disease often is associated with group B coxsackieviruses.

The development of insulin-dependent diabetes (IDDM) has been associated with recent enteroviral infection, particularly coxsackievirus B infection.[3]

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) have rigorously evaluated cases of acute flaccid myelitis (AFM) since 2014, when an increased number of cases were reported. AFM is a CNS disease that specifically affects the spinal cord gray matter, causing muscle and reflex weakness. Most reported AFM cases do not have an identified etiologic pathogen. However, coxsackievirus A16 has been one of the viruses recovered from cerebrospinal fluid in a small number of confirmed cases.

Pathophysiology

Coxsackieviruses primarily are transmitted via the fecal-oral route and respiratory aerosols, although transmission via fomites also is possible. Viral replication initially occurs in the upper respiratory tract, particularly the tonsils, and the distal small bowel. Viremia with systemic dissemination then occurs and involves the reticuloendothelial system, which leads to further replication in other anatomic locations and organs and ultimately to development of symptoms.[4] Central nervous system (CNS) invasion is proposed to occur from viral migration along peripheral and central nerves into the CNS.[4]  Coxsackieviruses have been identified in the respiratory tract up to 3 weeks after initial infection and in feces up to 8 weeks after initial infection. Innate, humoral and cell-mediated immunity all play a role in the body's response to enteroviral infection.[5]  However, the infection frequently is eradicated before antibody production occurs.[5]  

Epidemiology

Frequency

United States

Approximately 10 million symptomatic enteroviral infections are estimated to occur annually in the United States. From 2002-2004, an estimated 16.4-24.3% of these illnesses were attributed to coxsackievirus serotypes. For 2 of the 3 years, coxsackievirus B1 was the predominant serotype. Enteroviruses are responsible for approximately 30,000 to 50,000 hospitalizations per year. The CDC found that coxsackievirus infections accounted for approximately 25% of all neonatal enterovirus infections (26,737) from 1983 to 2003. Those due to coxsackievirus B4 were associated with a higher mortality rate than any other serotype.

The CDC reports coxsackievirus A16 as the virus most frequently isolated in hand, foot, and mouth disease (HFMD). Similarly, coxsackievirus A6 was the most frequently reported enterovirus from 2009-2013.

International

Coxsackievirus infections have worldwide distribution. They can be isolated year-round in tropical climates, with a decreasing incidence of disease and seasonality in areas of higher latitude.

Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Co-infections

The COVID-19 pandemic, caused by SARS-CoV-2, has significantly impacted the epidemiology of other respiratory viral pathogens.[6]  Among patients with SARS-CoV-2 co-infection, rhinoviruses and respiratory enteroviruses are the leading causative pathogens.[7]  This could be attributed to their non-enveloped nature and prolonged survival, which contribute to them being less susceptible to nonpharmaceutical interventions such as mask wearing and surface cleaning.[8, 9] Additionally, the majority of these co-infections manifest as mild COVID-19.[7]

Mortality/Morbidity

Mortality due to coxsackievirus infection is uncommon. Neonates and immunocompromised individuals are at highest risk for complications secondary to enteroviral infections.

Sex

During the first decade, enteroviral infections are more common in males, with a male-to-female ratio of 2:1. The reason for this disparity is not well understood.

Age

Coxsackievirus infections occur in all age groups but are more common in young children and infants. Children are at higher risk for infection during the first year of life. The rate of incident infection decreases substantially after the first decade of life.

Prognosis

In general, the prognosis for coxsackievirus infection is quite good, with over 90% of patients having no symptoms or experiencing mild, self-limited, nonspecific febrile illnesses or rashes.[10, 11]

Patient Education

Patients should be aware of the need for good hygiene practices to avoid transmission of coxsackievruses.

Patients can be reassured that they most likely have a self-limited viral illness that does not require antibiotics.

History

More than 90% of coxsackieviruses infections are asymptomatic or cause nonspecific febrile illnesses. In neonates, they are the most common cause of febrile illnesses during the summer and fall months. As measured yearround, thirteen percent of newborns with fever in the first month of life were noted to have an enteroviral infection. In addition to nonspecific febrile illnesses, various well-described syndromes also have been associated with coxsackievirus infections.

Aseptic meningitis

Patients with aseptic meningitis may have rapid or gradual onset of fever and chills, nausea and vomiting, malaise, headaches, neck pain, light sensitivity, and upper respiratory symptoms. Infants younger than 3 months have been noted to have the highest incidence of clinically recognized aseptic meningitis, partly because lumbar punctures often are performed for the evaluation of fever in this age group. These infants often present with only a febrile illness characterized by irritability and anorexia. Meningismus occurs in approximately 50% of infants with enteroviral meningitis.

Coxsackievirus B infection is more likely than coxsackievirus A to be associated with meningitis.[12]  

Seizures, lethargy, and movement disorders can occur early in the course of disease and have been reported in 5-10% of patients with enteroviral meningitis. No long-term neurologic deficits appear to exist in infants with aseptic meningitis caused by coxsackievirus. Adults may experience a more prolonged period of fever and headache compared with infants and children.

Encephalitis

Encephalitis is an unusual manifestation of CNS infection, although it sometimes is observed in association with aseptic meningitis. Enteroviruses account for approximately 5% of all cases of encephalitis. Coxsackievirus types A9, B2, and B5 have been linked with encephalitis.

Other neurologic syndromes

Rarely, coxsackieviruses have been implicated in other sporadic neurologic syndromes such as acute flaccid myelitis (AFM) that closely mimics poliovirus infection. In particular, Enterovirus D68 (EV-D68) is of prime interest as a causative agent of AFM. Initially described in the context of AFM in 2005, EV-D68 was associated with a sizable AFM outbreak in the United States in 2014, with additional outbreaks described in 2016 and 2018.[5]  Enterovirus A71 and coxsackievirus A16 also have been described in cases of AFM.[5]  Additionally, cases of Guillain-Barré syndrome have been described with coxsackievirus serotypes A2, A5, and A9.

Myopericarditis

Myopericarditis can occur at any age, but the condition occurs more often in adolescents and young adults. Enteroviruses account for half of all cases of acute viral myopericarditis.

Manifestations of myopericarditis range from an asymptomatic presentation to heart failure and death. Between the two extremes, most patients report dyspnea, chest pain, fever, and malaise.

Symptoms may be preceded by an upper respiratory infection within the preceding 7 to 14 days.

Presenting signs include pericardial friction rub, gallop rhythm, and cardiomegaly and/or pericardial effusion on chest radiography.

ECG abnormalities range from ST-segment elevations to heart block. Echocardiography can show diminished ejection fraction and/or left ventricular wall-motion abnormalities. Myocardial enzyme levels in the serum frequently are elevated.

The male-to-female ratio of myopericardtis is 2:1. The overall mortality rate is low, and the prognosis generally is better in children than adults. Complications include pericardial effusion, arrhythmia, heart block, valvular dysfunction, and dilated cardiomyopathy.

Diabetes

Although principally correlative, data suggests that autoimmune insulin-dependent diabetes is associated with group B coxsackievirus infections. Viral infection alone is not thought to be sufficient to cause autoimmune insulin-dependent diabetes.[3]  However, multiple factors, including viral load and type of infection along with host genetics and the pancreatic environment are thought to play significant roles in disease development.[3, 13]  Epidemiologic data note that clustering of new onset diabetes mellitus occurs 1 to 3 months following infection. Similarly, animal models have described infection of pancreatic islet cells by coxsackieviruses with multiple proposed mechanisms of action. Persistent rather than acute coxsackievirus B infection of the islet cells has been demonstrated, which can lead to beta-cell destruction via interferon and T-cell-mediated autoimmune pathways.[14]  Thymic dysfunction also has been implicated by means of coxsackievirus-B-induced thymic atrophy, apoptosis, and lymphocyte maturation impairment, leading to autoreactive T-cell production.[15]  

Exanthems and enanthems

Two of the most distinctive rash syndromes caused by coxsackieviruses are hand, foot, and mouth disease (HFMD) and herpangina.

HFMD often affects children and easily spreads to close contacts. Patients present with a sore throat and painful lesions in the mouth. Vesicles that coalesce, form bullae, and then ulcerate, occur on the buccal mucosa and tongue. Seventy-five percent of patients have simultaneous peripheral cutaneous lesions. HFMD also can present more atypically, including as eczema coxsackium, with erosions or bullous lesions.[16, 17]  Biopsy reveals intracytoplasmic viral particles. Coxsackieviruses A16, A6, and A10 are among the most common types implicated in HFMD. Numerous cases of a more severe HFMD caused by coxsackievirus A6 were reported between 2004 and 2011 in several Asian and European countries. Additionally, between 2011 and 2012 in the United States, among cases of severe HFMD that were reported, 74% had a positive PCR test for coxsackievirus A6; about 25% of reported cases occured in adults.

Herpangina is a vesicular enanthem of the posterior oropharynx. Patients often present with fever, sore throat, occasional throat exudate, odynophagia, and dysphagia. Dysphagia is observed more often in young children than in adolescents and adults. Prompt recovery is typical, with almost all patients recovering completely. Group A coxsackieviruses are the most common viruses isolated from herpangina patients.

Epidemic pleurodynia

Epidemic pleurodynia is a muscular disease in which viral invasion of muscle tissue causing inflammation is suspected; however, direct histologic evidence is lacking. Epidemic pleurodynia usually is associated with outbreaks of group B coxsackievirus infection.

Patients present with fever and sharp, paroxysmal, spasmodic pain in the chest and upper abdomen.

Acute hemorrhagic conjunctivitis

Pain and edema of the eyelids and subconjunctival hemorrhage are present.

Patients may report photophobia, foreign body sensation, fever, malaise, and headache. Symptoms usually resolve spontaneously within 1 week.

Rare complications include keratitis and motor paralysis.

This condition is highly contagious and has resulted in epidemics and pandemics.[18]

Sepsis

Coxsackieviruses have been identified in young pediatric patients with sepsis. Five coxsackievirus A serotypes (2, 4, 6, 10, 16) and one coxsackievirus B serotype (9) have been implicated. Coxsackievirus B9 also has been identified in neonatal sepsis.[19]

Physical exam findings

Aseptic meningitis

Patients may have nuchal rigidity or other signs of meningeal irritation, photophobia, pharyngitis, and rash. However, absence of one or more of these findings does not entirely exclude the diagnosis of aseptic meningitis.

Encephalitis

Patients with encephalitis can present with cerebral dysfunction that manifests as altered mental status, neurologic deficits (eg, motor, sensory, speech impairment), or seizures.

Myopericarditis

The presentation in patients with myopericarditis ranges from asymptomatic to critical illness due to severe heart failure. Most patients report fever, malaise, upper respiratory tract symptoms, dyspnea, and chest pain. The classic description of chest pain associated with pericarditis is that it increases when the patient is lying down and improves when the patient sits up and leans forward.

On examination, the point of maximal pulse (PMI) might be displaced, a pericardial friction rub may be heard, and signs of heart failure (eg, S3 gallop, pulmonary edema) may be present.

HFMD

Findings include vesicular lesions on the tongue or buccal mucosa and the hands and feet, including the palms and soles. Uncommonly, the buttocks and genitalia are involved. The vesicles are tender and may ulcerate. However, the vesicles are not typically pruritic, which helps to distinguish the condition from chickenpox.

Epidemic pleurodynia

Edema and tenderness to palpation of the involved muscles may be present.

Acute hemorrhagic conjunctivitis (AHC)

Findings include subconjunctival hemorrhage. Eye pain, edema of the eyelids, photophobia, and a serous discharge might be present. Slit-lamp examination might show keratitis.

Causes

Aseptic meningitis

Coxsackievirus B (serotypes 2-5) and echoviruses account for more than 90% of viral causes of aseptic meningitis.

Exanthems

Coxsackieviruses cause many different types of rashes. Whether the viruses directly cause the rashes or immunologic mechanisms are responsible is not known. An exception is HFMD, in which viruses are isolated directly from skin lesions. In most other instances, confirmation of a coxsackievirus as the etiologic cause occurs via polymerase chain reaction (PCR) or serology. HFMD predominantly is caused by coxsackievirus A16.

AHC

AHC most often is caused by coxsackievirus serotype A24. Transmission usually occurs via contact of contaminated fingers or fomites with the eyes. To prevent further transmission, strict handwashing should be encouraged and sharing of towels should be avoided.

Complications

See History and Physical, which discuss the many presentations of coxsackievirus infections.

Complications of aseptic meningitis include lethargy, seizures, coma, and movement disorders (5-10%).

Complications of myopericarditis include pericardial effusion, arrhythmia, heart block, valvular dysfunction, and dilated cardiomyopathy.

Rare complications of acute hemorrhagic conjunctivitis (AHC) include keratitis and motor paralysis.

Approach Considerations

Enteroviruses can be excreted in human feces for up to 3 months after infection. However, a clinically identifiable syndrome correlates with the acute phase of infection, during which time virus can be found in the throat, blood, and various organs.

There are no confirmatory laboratory tests, procedures, or imaging that are used in routine clinical practice for HFMD or herpangina. Diagnosis for these conditions mainly is based on clinical presentation and assessment.

Laboratory Studies

Definitive diagnosis of coxsackievirus infection can be made based on isolation of the virus in cell culture. Cytopathic effect usually can be seen within 2 to 6 days. Samples normally are taken from the stool or rectal swabs; the virus also can be isolated from the oropharynx early in the disease course. However, given improved sensitivity and faster turn-around time, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) has emerged as the most prominent diagnostic tool used for enteroviral detection. Serology is available as a diagnostic modality but can be difficult to interpret. Traditionally, enteroviral infections are diagnosed after a rise in neutralizing antibody titer (at least a 4-fold rise in titer between acute and convalescent phase).

Aseptic meningitis

Before a diagnosis of aseptic meningitis can be made, bacterial meningitis should be considered and excluded. Empiric antibiotics typically are required during this time period. Diagnosis requires cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) evaluation, which tends to show a lymphocytic predominance, normal-to-decreased glucose levels, and normal-to-slightly elevated protein levels. The virus can be isolated via PCR (sensitivity, 66-90%) and, much less commonly, cell culture (sensitivity, 30-35%). A recent study in infants reported that routine CSF PCR for enteroviruses resulted in shorter hospital stays (by 1.54 days) and a decreased duration of antibiotic use (by 33%).

Encephalitis

Diagnostic workup requires a lumbar puncture (LP) with CSF evaluation, which yields findings similar to those of aseptic meningitis.

Electroencephalography (EEG) can be considered in some patients, particularly for the evaluation of nonconvulsive or subclinical seizures. Enteroviral and other causes of viral encephalitis typically appear as diffuse background slowing on EEG, but epileptiform activity may be present as well.[20]

Please see section on Imaging Studies below for further recommendations 

Myopericarditis

Laboratory tests generally are circumstantial, with evidence of infection based upon positive PCR tests from the oropharynx or feces, or upon serological testing.

Acute hemorrhagic conjunctivitis (AHC)

Diagnosis requires conjunctival swabs or scrapings, which are 90% successful. A rising antibody titer also can theoretically be used to confirm a diagnosis.

Imaging Studies

Computed tomographic (CT) scanning of the brain can be obtained upon initial presentation of patients with suspected meningitis and/or encephalitis to evaluate for hemorrhage, increased intracranial pressure, or mass lesions.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the brain can show hyperintense signal uptake in the posterior brain stem, substantia nigra, dentate nucleus, and anterior horns of the spinal cord.[21]

Echocardiography should be used to evaluate cardiac function and valvular disease in patients with myopericarditis and/or heart failure.

Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (CMR) can be used to identify imaging features characteristic of myocarditis such as necrosis, scarring, and myocardial hyperemia and edema.[22]

Other Tests

Depending upon the clinical presentation, a throat culture can be obtained to evaluate for possible streptococcal pharyngitis and/or tonsillitis.

HIV testing can be considered in patients who present with nonspecific febrile illness or rashes, depending on the epidemiologic history.

ECG changes in myopericarditis include ST-segment elevations or nonspecific ST segment and/or T-wave abnormalities, arrhythmia, and heart block.

In select instances in which viral myocarditis is being considered as the etiological cause for new-onset heart failure, endomyocardial biopsy might be indicated. 

Procedures

Lumbar puncture is crucial in the evaluation of suspected meningitis and/or encephalitis.

Skin biopsy rarely may be helpful in the evaluation of nonspecific exanthems.

Histologic Findings

Intracytoplasmic viral particles may be observed, especially with skin lesions and/or rashes of HFMD.

Medical Care

Viral killing may be complicated by difficult eradication and potentially prolonged survival in water and sewage in the environment.[23]  Medical care generally is supportive and can be offered on an outpatient basis. More severe symptoms and clinical syndromes may require inpatient admission for further evaluation and treatment.

Antivirals and other therapies

There are no routine antiviral drugs used to treat infections caused by coxsackieviruses.[23]  However, both intravenous immune globulin (IVIG) and the antiviral agent pleconaril have been investigated for possible efficacy in treating enteroviral infections, particularly in infants and immunocomprimised individuals with severe enteroviral syndromes such as encephalitis and myocarditis.

Pleconaril is an antiviral drug that has been shown to impair the function of viral capsid protein, thereby preventing viral attachment to cells necessary for proliferation. Several small trials have investigated the clinical efficacy of pleconaril in the treatment of coxsackieviruses and other viruses. These studies have shown a potential modest effect in shortening the course of illness when initiated early in the disease course.[24, 25, 26] However, given the small benefit of treatment along with potential side effects, drug-drug interactions, and potential rise in viral resistance, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) elected not to approve the use of pleconaril for the treatment of Picornavirus infections. 

The mechanism of IVIG in inhibiting enteroviral infections is unclear but thought to involve direct viral neutralization by specific antibodies along with downregulation of inflammatory cytokines. In a literature review of IVIG use in the setting of enteroviral encephalitis, the authors noted that interleukin and interferon levels typically were elevated in severe enteroviral infection and were subsequently lowered after IVIG administration. However, it remains unclear whether reduction in cytokine levels results in improved mortality. In addition, many questions remain regarding optimal IVIG use including dosing, timing, and route of administration.[27]

Aseptic meningitis

Treatment mainly is supportive.

Pleconaril, an enteroviral capsid-stabilizing drug, appeared to reduce symptoms in a randomized double-blind study (N = 33),[28] but has not been licensed by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), as noted above.

Not all patients require hospitalization, but consider admission for patients with changes in mental status or neurologic deficits.

Myopericarditis

IVIG has been of anecdotal benefit, but no randomized trials have been conducted. A large prospective trial of prednisone with cyclosporine or azathioprine showed no difference compared with supportive treatment alone.[29] Recent experiments have shown that carvedilol, a nonselective beta-blocker, attenuates myocardial lesions and decreases myocardial virus replication in a murine model. However, this intervention has not been evaluated in humans.[30]

Epidemic pleurodynia

Analgesics, narcotics, and heating pads are the mainstays of therapy. All patients recover completely within 1 week.

Acute hemorrhagic conjunctivitis (AHC)

Treatment is symptomatic, and no antimicrobial agent is necessary in the absence of bacterial superinfection.

Immunodeficiency

Both IVIG and pleconaril have been used in immunocompromised patients with severe enteroviral infections (neonates and B-cell immunodeficient) with varying success based mainly on case reports and and small case series (see Medical Care section).

In vitro studies have suggested that arbidol may have potential as a future antiviral agent with activity against coxsackievirus, but no human trials have been performed.[31]

Surgical Care

No surgical intervention is necessary unless patients develop complications such as meningitis and/or encephalitis with increased intracranial pressure, which requires ventriculostomy, or heart failure, which requires valve repair or cardiac transplant.

Consultations

Consultations play an important role in patients with complex presentations.

A neurologist may help to evaluate patients who present with abnormal neurologic symptoms or to manage rare complications associated with meningitis.

A neurosurgeon may be needed to assist with obtaining brain biopsies or placing a ventriculostomy tube because of increased intracranial pressure.

A cardiologist helps with diagnosis and management of arrhythmia, heart failure, and heart block associated with myocarditis.

Diet

Diet is as tolerated.

Activity

Bedrest is indicated for some patients.

Prevention

No routine vaccinations are available for prevention of coxsackievirus infections. However, there has been increased interest in vaccine development for coxsackieviruses for prevention of complications such as HFMD. Multiple studies have demonstrated good tolerability and high immunogenicity in mouse models.[14, 32, 33] Trials are ongoing to investigate the safety profile in human subjects.[34]

Minimize respiratory contact with patients with active infection if possible.

To prevent further transmission, strict handwashing should be encouraged.

Long-Term Monitoring

There is a paucity of prospective data describing the neurodevelopmental outcomes of meningitis in children (Posnakoglou). However, case series describing outcomes such as neurodevelopmental delay, diminished verbal operations, and seizure disorders suggest close developmental monitoring is appropriate in those patients.[12]

Further Outpatient Care

No outpatient care, other than usual follow-up care, is required for patients with mild symptoms.

Further Inpatient Care

Patients with aseptic meningitis and/or encephalitis, seizures, myopericarditis, and heart failure typically require hospital admission for further evaluation and treatment. Antibiotics may be needed until bacterial meningitis or another bacterial infection has been excluded as a diagnostic consideration.

Inpatient & Outpatient Medications

Inpatient medications prescribed would be based on the patient's clinical presentation (eg, phenytoin for seizure prophylaxis and/or suppression in patients with aseptic meningitis/encephalitis, furosemide in patients with heart failure, etc.).

Antipyretics (eg, acetaminophen) for fever and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for pain should be adequate in patients with mild symptoms who do not require hospital admission.

Transfer

Transfer to a tertiary facility may be necessary for specialized consultations or surgeries.

Medication Summary

No FDA-approved therapy exists for the treatment of enteroviral infections. IVIG and pleconaril have been used on a case-by-case basis in severe illness (see section on Medical Care). Supportive use of analgesics and antipyretics frequently are necessary.

What are coxsackieviruses?What is the difference between group A and group B coxsackieviruses?What is the pathophysiology of coxsackievirus infection?What is the prevalence of coxsackievirus infection in the US?What is the global prevalence of coxsackievirus infections?What is the mortality risk for coxsackievirus infection?How does the prevalence of coxsackievirus infection vary by sex?How does the prevalence of coxsackievirus infection vary by age?How prevalent is coxsackievirus encephalitis?What are the signs and symptoms of coxsackievirus myopericarditis?Which history findings are characteristic of coxsackievirus infections?What are the signs and symptoms of aseptic meningitis caused by coxsackieviruses?Which neurologic diseases are caused by coxsackieviruses?What is the role of coxsackievirus infection in the etiology of diabetes?What are the signs and symptoms of exanthems caused by coxsackievirus infection?What are the signs and symptoms of pleurodynia caused by coxsackievirus infection?What are the signs and symptoms of acute coxsackievirus hemorrhagic conjunctivitis?How frequently does coxsackievirus infection cause aseptic meningitis?What is the etiologic role of coxsackieviruses in exanthems?What is the etiologic role of coxsackieviruses in acute hemorrhagic conjunctivitis (AHC)?Which physical findings suggest coxsackievirus aseptic meningitis?Which physical findings suggest coxsackievirus encephalitis?Which physical findings suggest coxsackievirus myopericarditis?Which physical findings suggest hand, foot, and mouth disease (HFMD) caused by coxsackievirus infection?Which physical findings suggest coxsackievirus pleurodynia?Which physical findings suggest coxsackievirus acute hemorrhagic conjunctivitis (AHC)?Which conditions should be included in the differential diagnosis of coxsackievirus aseptic meningitis?Which conditions should be included in the differential diagnosis of coxsackievirus encephalitis?Which conditions should be included in the differential diagnosis of coxsackievirus myopericarditis?Which conditions should be included in the differential diagnosis of coxsackievirus hand, foot, and mouth disease (HFMD)?Which conditions should be included in the differential diagnosis of coxsackievirus herpangina?Which conditions should be included in the differential diagnosis of coxsackievirus epidemic pleurodynia?Which conditions should be included in the differential diagnosis of coxsackievirus acute hemorrhagic conjunctivitis?What is the role of lab studies in the diagnosis of coxsackievirus infection?What is the role of lab studies in the workup coxsackievirus aseptic meningitis?What is the role of lab studies in the workup of coxsackievirus encephalitis?What is the role of lab studies in the workup of coxsackievirus myopericarditis?What is the role of lab studies in the workup of coxsackievirus acute hemorrhagic conjunctivitis (AHC)?What is the role of imaging studies in the evaluation of coxsackievirus infection?Which tests may be useful in the evaluation of coxsackievirus infection?Which procedures may be useful in the evaluation of coxsackievirus infection?Which histologic findings are characteristic of coxsackievirus infections?What is the approach to treatment of coxsackievirus infection?What is included in medical care for coxsackievirus aseptic meningitis?What is included in medical care for coxsackievirus myopericarditis?What is included in medical care for coxsackievirus epidemic pleurodynia?What is included in medical care for coxsackievirus acute hemorrhagic conjunctivitis (AHC)?What is included in medical care for immunodeficiency in patients with coxsackievirus infections?What is the role of surgery in the treatment of coxsackievirus infection?Which specialist consultations are needed for the treatment of coxsackievirus infection?Which dietary modifications are needed for patients with coxsackievirus infection?Which activity modifications are needed for patients with coxsackievirus infection?What is the role of medications in the treatment of coxsackievirus infection?

Author

Eric Wu, MD, Academic Hospitalist, Michael E DeBakey VA Medical Center; Assistant Professor, Baylor College of Medicine

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Prathit A Kulkarni, MD, Assistant Professor, Department of Medicine, Section of Infectious Diseases, Associate Program Director, Infectious Diseases Fellowship Program, Baylor College of Medicine; Assistant Chief of Medicine, Medical Care Line, Associate Site Director, Internal Medicine Residency Program, Michael E DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center

Disclosure: Received research grant from: Vessel Health, Inc.

Rajeev Balchandani, MD, Assistant Professor of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine; Hospitalist Physician, Medicine Care Line, Michael E DeBakey VA Medical Center

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editors

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD, Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Received salary from Medscape for employment. for: Medscape.

John W King, MD, Professor of Medicine, Chief, Section of Infectious Diseases, Director, Viral Therapeutics Clinics for Hepatitis, Louisiana State University School of Medicine in Shreveport; Consultant in Infectious Diseases, Overton Brooks Veterans Affairs Medical Center

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Michael Stuart Bronze, MD, David Ross Boyd Professor and Chairman, Department of Medicine, Stewart G Wolf Endowed Chair in Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Science Center; Master of the American College of Physicians; Fellow, Infectious Diseases Society of America; Fellow of the Royal College of Physicians, London

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Additional Contributors

Maria D Mileno, MD, Associate Professor of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Martha L Muller, MD, MPH, Professor of Pediatrics, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of New Mexico School of Medicine

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

Mashiul H Chowdhury, MD Assistant Professor, Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Disease, Program Director, Infectious Disease Fellowship, Director, TravelHealth Center, Drexel University College of Medicine

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Nhat M Doan, MD Fellow, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Washington Hospital Center

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Parul Kaushik, MD, MPH Fellow, Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Disease, Drexel University College of Medicine

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Michael Rajnik, MD Associate Professor, Department of Pediatrics, Program Director, Pediatric Infectious Disease Fellowship Program, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences

Michael Rajnik is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Pediatrics, Armed Forces Infectious Disease Society, Infectious Diseases Society of America, and Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society.

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

References

  1. Tariq N, Kyriakopoulos C. Group B Coxsackie Virus. 2022 Jan. [View Abstract]
  2. Nikonov OS, Chernykh ES, Garber MB, Nikonova EY. Enteroviruses: Classification, Diseases They Cause, and Approaches to Development of Antiviral Drugs. Biochemistry (Mosc). December 2017. (82)13:1615-1631.
  3. Issacs S, Foskett D, Maxwell A, Ward E, Faulkner C, Luo J, et al. Viruses and type-1 diabetes: from enteroviruses to the virome. Microorganisms. 2021. 9:
  4. Tyring S. Hand foot and mouth disease: enteroviral load and disease severity. EBioMedicine. 2020. 62:
  5. Elrick M, Pekosz A, Duggal P. Enterovirus D68 molecular and cellular biology and pathogenesis. Journal Biol Chem. 2021. 296:
  6. Olsen S, Winn A, Budd A, Prill M, Steel J, Midgley, et al. Changes in influenza and other respiratory virus activity during the COVID-19 pandemic-United States, 2020-2021. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. July 23, 2021. 70:1013-1019.
  7. Brotons P, Jordan I, Bassat Q, Henares D, Fernandez de Sevilla M, Ajanovic S, et al. The positive rhinovirus/enterovirus detection and SARS-CoV-2 persistence beyond the acute infection phase: an intra-household surveillance study. Viruses. 2021. 13:
  8. Olsen SJ, Winn AK, Budd AP, et al. Changes in Influenza and Other Respiratory Virus Activity During the COVID-19 Pandemic — United States, 2020–2021. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. July 23, 2021. 70:1013-1019.
  9. Chow Eric J, Uyeki Timothy M, Chu Helen Y. The effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on community respiratory virus activity. Nat Rev Microbiol. October 17, 2022. 1-16.
  10. Rotbart HA, McCracken GH Jr, Whitley RJ, Modlin JF, Cascino M, Shah S, et al. Clinical significance of enteroviruses in serious summer febrile illnesses of children. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1999. 10:869-74.
  11. Kogon A, Spigland I, Frothingham TE, Elveback L, Williams C, Hall CE, et al. The virus watch program: a continuing surveillance of viral infections in metropolitan New York families. VII. Observations on viral excretion, seroimmunity, intrafamilial spread and illness association in coxsackie and echovirus infections. Am J Epidemiol. Jan 1968. 1:51-61.
  12. Posnakoglou L, Tatsi E, Chatzichristou P, Siahanidou T, Kanaka-Gantenbein C, Syriopoulou V, et al. Molecular epidemiology of enterovirus in children with central nervous system infections. Viruses. 2021. 13:
  13. Oikarinen S, Krogvold L, Edwin B, Buanes T, Korsgren O, Laiho J, et al. Characterisation of enterovirus RNA detected in the pancreas and other specimens of live patients with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes in the DiViD study. Diabetologia. 2021 Nov. 64:2491-2501.
  14. Nekoua MP, Alidjinou EK, Hober D. Persistent coxsackievirus B infection and pathogenesis of type 1 diabetes mellitus. Nat Rev Endocrinol. June 1, 2022. 18(8):503-516.
  15. Alhazmi A, Nekoua MP, Michaux H, Sane F, Halouani A, Engelmann I, et al. Effect of Coxsackievirus B4 Infection on the Thymus: Elucidating Its Role in the Pathogenesis of Type 1 Diabetes. Microorganisms. May 29, 2021. 9(6):1177.
  16. Horsten H. Eczema Coxsackium caused by Coxsackievirus A6. Pediatric Dermatology. 2016. 33:e230-e231.
  17. Perez V, Melnick L, Whittier S, Dayan P, Garzon M, Morel K, et al. The use of respiratory pathogen panel nasal polymerase chain reaction testing in predicting cutaneous enteroviral infections in the pediatric population. Pediatric Dermatology. 2021. 38:602-605.
  18. Baggen J, Hurdiss DL, Zocher G, Mistry N, Roberts RW, Slager JJ, et al. Role of enhanced receptor engagement in the evolution of a pandemic acute hemorrhagic conjunctivitis virus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. January 9, 2018. 115(2):397-402.
  19. Zheng M, Wang H, Tang J, He Y, Xiong T, Li W, et al. Clinical characteristics of severe neonatal enterovirus infection: a systematic review. BMC Pediatrics. 2021. 21:127.
  20. Claassen J, Mayer SA, Kowalski RG, Emerson RG, Hirsch LJ. Detection of electrographic seizures with continuous EEG monitoring in critically ill patients. Neurology. May 25, 2004. 10:1743-8.
  21. Mohamed Saied Abdelgawad, Abd El-Aziz El-Nekidy, Rania A.M. Abouyoussef, Amr El-Fatary. MRI findings of enteroviral encephalomyelitis. The Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine. 2016. 47:1031-6.
  22. Kotanidis CP, Bazmpani MA, Haidich AB, Karvounis C, Antoniades C, Karamitsos TD. Diagnostic Accuracy of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance in Acute Myocarditis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. November 2018. 11:1583-1590.
  23. Anasir M, Zarif F, Poh C. Antivirals blocking entry of enteroviruses and therapeutic potential. Journal of Biomedical Science. 2021. 28:
  24. Pevear DC, Tull TM, Seipel ME, Groarke JM. Activity of pleconaril against enteroviruses. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. September 1999. 43(9):2109-15.
  25. Rotbart HA, Webster AD; Pleconaril Treatment Registry Group. Treatment of potentially life-threatening enterovirus infections with pleconaril. Clin Infect Dis. January 15, 2001. 32(2):228-35.
  26. Desmond RA, Accortt NA, Talley L, Villano SA, Soong SJ, Whitley RJ. Enteroviral meningitis: natural history and outcome of pleconaril therapy. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. July 2006. 50(7):2409-14.
  27. Wagner JN, Leibetseder A, Troescher A, Panholzer J, von Oertzen TJ. Characteristics and therapy of enteroviral encephalitis: case report and systematic literature review. Int J Infect Dis. December 2021. 113:93-102.
  28. Schiff GM, Sherwood JR. Clinical activity of pleconaril in an experimentally induced coxsackievirus A21 respiratory infection. J Infect Dis. 2000 Jan. 181(1):20-6. [View Abstract]
  29. Brunetti L, DeSantis ER. Treatment of viral myocarditis caused by coxsackievirus B. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2008 Jan 15. 65(2):132-7. [View Abstract]
  30. Yue-Chun L, LiSha G, Jiang-Hua R, Peng-Lin Y, Jia-Feng L, Ji-Fei T, et al. Protective effects of carvedilol in murine model with the coxsackievirus B3-induced viral myocarditis. J Cardiovas Pharmacol. Jan/2008. 51:92-98. [View Abstract]
  31. Shi L, Xiong H, He J, et al. Antiviral activity of arbidol against influenza A virus, respiratory syncytial virus, rhinovirus, coxsackie virus and adenovirus in vitro and in vivo. Arch Virol. 2007. 152(8):1447-55. [View Abstract]
  32. Cheng D, Chiu YW, Huang SW, Lien YY, Chang CL, Tsai HP, et al. Genetic and Cross Neutralization Analyses of Coxsackievirus A16 Circulating in Taiwan from 1998 to 2021 Suggest Dominant Genotype B1 can Serve as Vaccine Candidate. Viruses. October 20, 2022. 14(10):2306.
  33. Mao QY, Wang Y, Bian L, Xu M, Liang Z. EV71 vaccine, a new tool to control outbreaks of hand, foot and mouth disease (HFMD). Expert Rev Vaccines. January 14, 2016. 15(5):599-606.
  34. PROtocol for Coxsackievirus VaccinE in Healthy VoluNTteers (PROVENT). ClinicalTrials.gov. Available at https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04690426. December 30, 2020; Accessed: July 25, 2022.
  35. CDC. Non-Polio Enterovirus: Outbreaks & Surveillance. CDC. Available at https://www.cdc.gov/non-polio-enterovirus/outbreaks-surveillance.html. November 14, 2018; Accessed: December 6, 2019.
  36. CDC. Non-Polio Enterovirus: For Health Care Professionals. CDC. Available at https://www.cdc.gov/non-polio-enterovirus/hcp.html. November 14, 2018; Accessed: December 6, 2019.
  37. CDC. Acute Flaccid Myelitis: AFM Investigation. CDC. Available at https://www.cdc.gov/acute-flaccid-myelitis/afm-investigation.html. November 4, 2019; Accessed: December 6, 2019.