Electrical Injuries

Back

Practice Essentials

Electrical injuries have become a more common form of trauma with a unique pathophysiology and with high morbidity and mortality. They encompass several types, as follows: lightning injury,[1]  high-voltage injury, and low-voltage injury.[2, 3, 4]  Clinical manifestations range from transient unpleasant sensations without apparent injury to massive tissue damage.[5]  Some electrocutions are instantly fatal. Familiarity with the mechanisms of injury and the principles of therapy improves patient care.[6]

Four classes of electrical injuries are as follows[7] :

See the images below.



View Image

Arcing electrical burns through the shoe around the rubber sole. High-voltage (7600 V) alternating current nominal. Note cratering.



View Image

Contact electrical burn. This was the ground of a 120-V alternating current nominal circuit. Note vesicle with surrounding erythema. Note thermal and ....



View Image

Contact electrical burns, 120-V alternating current nominal. The right knee was the energized side, and the left was ground. These are contact burns a....



View Image

Electrical burns to the hand.

Signs and symptoms of electrical injuries

Clinical presentations range from a tingling sensation to a widespread tissue damage and even to instantaneous death. The main symptom of an electrical injury is often a skin burn. Cardiac arrhythmias can also occur. The following are the most common electrocardiographic abnormalities:

Diagnosis

Laboratory studies

Indicated laboratory studies include the following:

Imaging studies

Radiographs of the cervical spine, chest, and pelvis should be ordered if the patient was previously unconscious. In addition, appropriate extremity radiographs should be obtained in patients with obvious extremity injuries

Other tests

An electrocardiogram should be obtained in all patients. If smoke inhalation is suspected, arterial blood gas analysis and pulse oximetry may be indicated.

See Workup for more detail.

Management

Patients with electrical injury should be initially evaluated as a trauma patient. Airway, breathing, circulation, and inline immobilization of the spine should be performed as a part of the primary survey. Maintain a high index of suspicion and evaluate for hidden injuries. Intravenous access, cardiac monitoring, and measurement of oxygen saturation should be started during the primary survey. Fluid replacement is the most important aspect of the initial resuscitation.

See Treatment for more detail.

Patient education

Since most electrical injuries are preventable, prevention, education, and adherence to safety measures both at home and at work constitute the most important aspect of management.[8]

History of the Procedure

Ever since Franklin's experiments with lightning, people have been fascinated with electricity; however, the widespread use of electricity and the application of electrically powered machinery have caused an increase in the number of electrical injuries.[9] Samuel W. Smith was the first person in the United States to die after electrocution by a generator in Buffalo, New York, in 1881.

Problem

To fully understand such injuries, understanding certain basic electrical principles is necessary.

Direct current (DC) flows in a constant direction. Batteries, for example, deliver direct current. High-voltage direct current is used as a means for the bulk transmission of electrical power.

Alternating current (AC) is an electric flow that regularly reverses its direction. Each forward-backward motion interval is called a cycle. Electric current in the United States alternates with a frequency of 60 hertz (Hz). The usual waveform of an AC power circuit is a sine wave, because this results in the most efficient transmission of energy, but, at the same time, it is also more dangerous than DC. AC is standard in US electrical outlets.

A volt is a unit of electromotive force or pressure that causes current to flow. In US household wiring, 120 volts are present between the hot wire and the ground wire. Most electrical shocks come from constant voltage sources; that is, the actual number of volts present does not change appreciably over time, despite variable current drainage from the source. Nonconstant voltage sources, such as cardiac defibrillators and capacitors, deliver varying voltages.

The use of a higher voltage leads to more efficient transmission of power; therefore, it is advantageous when transmitting large amounts of power to distribute the power with extremely high voltages (sometimes as high as hundreds of kilovolts). However, high voltages also have disadvantages, the main ones being the increased danger to anyone who comes into contact with them, the extra insulation required, and the increased difficulty in their safe handling.

An ampere is a unit of electrical current. More precisely, it is the flow of a certain number of electrons per second.

An ohm is a unit of electrical resistance. Conductance is defined as 1/resistance (ie, the inverse of resistance). The resistance of a material to current flow depends on the physical and chemical properties of the material. The amount of current flow often determines the magnitude of injury. Ohm law states that current is directly proportional to the voltage and inversely proportional to resistance (I=V/R) and can be useful for calculating the current flow during electric shock.[10, 11]

Heat generated in a material due to current flow is an indication of power. A watt is the unit of electrical power that is delivered when 1 ampere flows through 1 ohm for 1 second. Power is equal to voltage multiplied by current (P=VxI). Energy is defined in terms of a watt-second. One watt-second is equal to 1 joule. One watt of power delivered for 1 second produces 0.24 calories of heat.[10, 11]

Epidemiology

Electrical injuries result in an estimated 1000 deaths per year and about 3000 admissions to specialized burn centers per year. Up to 40% of serious electrical injuries are fatal.[2, 3, 4]  A retrospective study reported that patients who had sustained high-voltage injuries (>1000 volts) were more likely to be male.[12]

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 444 lightning-related deaths were reported in the United States between 2006 and 2021. There were 19 deaths in 2022 and 13 in 2023.[13]  The chances of being struck by lightning are increased by wearing or carrying a metal object or simply being wet.

An epidemiological study of 383 cases in China underscores the need for stronger preventive measures.[14]

Etiology

Approximately 20% of all electrical injuries occur in children, with a bimodal peak incidence highest in toddlers and adolescents. Most electrical injuries that occur in children are at home, with extension cords (60-70%) and wall outlets (10-15%) being by far the most common sources in this age group.[15] Electrical burns account for 2-3% of all burns in children that require emergency department care.

In adults, most electrical injuries happen at the workplace and constitute the fourth leading cause of work-related traumatic death. One third of all electrical traumas and most high-voltage injuries are job related. More than 50% of these occupational electrocutions result from power line contact (5-6% of all work-related deaths), and 25% result from using electrical tools or machines. The annual occupational death rate from electricity is 1 death per 100,000 workers, with a male-to-female ratio of 9:1.[4]

Pathophysiology

The 3 major mechanisms of electricity-induced injury are as follows[6, 10, 11] :

Factors that determine the degree of injury include the magnitude of energy delivered, resistance encountered, type of current, current pathway, and duration of contact. Systemic effects and tissue damage are directly proportional to the magnitude of current delivered to the victim. Current flow (amperage) is directly related to voltage and inversely related to resistance, as dictated by Ohm law (I=V/R; where I=current, V=voltage, R=resistance). Of the parameters described by Ohm law, voltage usually can be determined and is used to gauge the potential magnitude of current exposure and, therefore, the magnitude of injury.[6, 10, 11]

Electrical shock is classified as high voltage (>1000 volts) or low voltage (< 1000 volts). As a general rule, high voltage is associated with greater morbidity and mortality, although fatal injury can occur at household current (110 volts).

AC is substantially more dangerous than DC. Contact with AC may cause tetanic muscle contraction, preventing the victim from releasing the electrical source and, thereby, increasing the duration of contact and current delivery. Thoracic muscle tetany involving the diaphragm and intercostal muscles can result in respiratory arrest. The repetitive nature of AC increases the likelihood of current delivery to the myocardium during the vulnerable recovery period of the cardiac cycle, which can precipitate ventricular fibrillation. In contrast, DC usually causes a single violent muscle contraction, often thrusting the victim away from the source. Lightning is a unidirectional massive current that lasts from 1/10 to 1/1000 of a second, but often has voltages that exceed 10 million volts.

The most important difference between lightning and high-voltage electrical injuries is the duration of exposure to the current.[2, 3] Body tissues differ in their resistance. In general, tissues with high fluid and electrolyte content conduct electricity better. Bone is the tissue most resistant to the flow of electricity. Nerve tissue is the least resistant, and together with blood vessels, muscles, and mucous membranes offers a path of low resistance for electricity. Skin provides intermediate resistance and is the most important factor impeding current flow. Skin is the primary resistor against electrical current, and its degree of resistance is determined by its thickness and moisture. It varies from 1000 ohms for humid thin skin to several thousand ohms for dry calloused skin.

The current pathway determines which tissues are at risk and what type of injury is observed. Electrical current that passes through the head or thorax is more likely to produce fatal injury. Transthoracic currents can cause fatal arrhythmia, direct cardiac damage, or respiratory arrest.[16] Transcranial currents can cause direct brain injury, seizure, respiratory arrest, and paralysis.

Electrothermal tissue injury results in tissue edema; therefore, the development of a compartment syndrome can occur in any body compartment. The leg is the site most commonly involved for the development of compartment syndrome.

The current intensity will have a probable effect in the body, determined by the factors discussed above. There may be individual variation on the energy dose for a specific effect. Less energy is generally required in children, who have more water content and thin skin and, hence, better conductivity and less resistance, and in patients under moist conditions.

Current intensity and its expected clinical manifestation are outlined below:

Presentation

Clinical presentations range from a tingling sensation to a widespread tissue damage and even to instantaneous death. The external resistance to electric flow is offered primarily by the skin and appendages and by the internal resistance of all other tissues, including nerves, blood, muscles, tendons, bone, and fat. Since the skin resistance can be affected by moisture, electric current can be transmitted to deeper structures before it causes significant skin damage. Electric current may be retained in the bones, causing heat and leading to necrosis and coagulation of small- to medium-sized vessels within the muscles and other tissues, almost completely sparing the skin.

Often, the main symptom of an electrical injury is a skin burn. A specific type of burn, called the "kissing burn," occurs at the flexor creases and is related to the current flowing through the opposing skin at the joint when the flexor muscles contract due to tetany. Not all electrical injuries cause external damage; high-voltage injuries may cause massive internal burns and coagulation necrosis along with edema and compartment syndrome.[17] Lightning injury usually causes superficial surface burns.[2, 3]

The heart can be damaged by direct necrosis to the myocardium and by cardiac dysrhythmias.[18] Cardiac arrhythmia can occur and range from benign to fatal. High voltage or DC current usually causes asystole, and AC current usually causes ventricular fibrillation. Ventricular fibrillation is the most common fatal arrhythmia, occurring in up to 60% of patients in whom the current pathway goes from one hand to the other hand. The most common abnormalities seen on an electrocardiogram (ECG) are sinus tachycardia, nonspecific ST- and T-wave changes, heart blocks, and prolongation of the QT interval.[16]  In a retrospective analysis that included 480 patients, no late-onset malignant arrhythmias were observed.[19]  A case report described coronary artery dissection after electrical injury.[20]

The most common electrical injury seen in children younger than 4 years is the mouth burn.[15] These burns may cause facial deformities and growth problems of the teeth, jaw, and face. If a current travels close to the eyes, it may lead to cataracts. Cataracts can develop within days of the injury or years later.

Acute renal failure can complicate the hospital course due to acute tubular necrosis secondary hypovolemia from third spacing and huge volume shift. Rhabdomyolysis that results from massive tissue necrosis can also cause pigment-induced renal failure.

About two thirds of patients struck by lightning have ruptured eardrums. Autonomic dysfunction can cause pupils that are fixed and dilated or asymmetric, and this finding should not be used as a reason to stop resuscitation.[21] The "locking-on" phenomenon refers to a refractory state of neuromuscular stimulation with tetanic contractions that prevents the victim's hand to release the electrical source.

Electric burn patients may present with bone fractures from either severe muscle contractions (eg, avulsion fractures) or as a result of falls. This is more commonly seen in upper limb long bones and in vertebrae.

Indications

Indications to pursue an evaluation depend on the history. A thorough documentation is essential in the physical examination. As noted above, the type of injury depends on the voltage and the type of current.[22] A low threshold for fasciotomy is indicated because an early fasciotomy may prevent limb ischemia and also may prevent or limit the extent of amputation. Importantly, remember that the superficial appearance of an electrical burn may underestimate the degree of underlying tissue destruction.

Relevant Anatomy

Current travels down the path of least resistance. Nerve and muscle tissues have lower resistance than skin tissue. Understanding that an injured extremity may not show external signs of injury is important. Moreover, injury to deeper tissues may lead to edema and increased intracompartmental pressure.

Contraindications

The liberal indications for fasciotomy cannot be overemphasized because the morbidity associated with a failure to perform a needed fasciotomy far outweighs that caused by the procedure itself. The most important contraindication would be the failure to treat more severely life-threatening injuries or complications of electrical shock or a failure to adequately resuscitate the patient prior to surgical intervention.

Prognosis

The location and extent of injury, the development of complications, and the functional result determine outcome and prognosis. Recent advances in ICU care, resuscitation, nutritional support, and surgical techniques, along with new skin substitutes, have significantly improved outcomes.

Complications

Hopefully, compartment syndrome can be avoided. Other complications include local infection (as with any burn injury), neurologic injury from the initial insult, and complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS). Other associated injuries carry their own list of complications.[23]

Treat wound infections in the standard manner. Early physical and occupational therapy can reduce limb dysfunction (eg, CRPS).

A 10-year retrospective study by Pawlik et al that assessed electrical accident related possible cardiac complications in the emergency department found that of the 149 out of 240 patients who received follow-up cardiac monitoring, four dysrhythmias were recorded; however, no serious cardiac complications occurred.[24]

A retrospective study of 465 patients admitted for electrical injuries in Norway reported no in-hospital or 30-day mortality, and no serious arrhythmias. The results suggest that conscious patients with normal ECGs who have sustained low-voltage injuries can be safely discharged after a clinical assessment.[25]

A study by Stockly et al found that adult patients with electrical injuries reported poorer physical health and were 50% less likely to be employed at 24-month follow-up, compared with patients who had fire-related injuries. They were also more likely to have neuropathy (16.2% vs 7.9%) and to have required an amputation (29.4% vs 5.7%).[26]

Laboratory Studies

Indicated laboratory studies include complete blood cell count, serum electrolyte levels, liver function tests, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine levels, and urinalysis with urine for myoglobin. Determination of creatine kinase (CK) is important to develop an appropriate management plan.

More severely injured patients who require surgery may need blood typing or cross matching, prothrombin time, and activated partial thromboplastin time studies.

Imaging Studies

The need for imaging studies is dictated by other elements of the history or by patient complaints. Violent tetanic contractions may lead to focal bone fractures; the latter can also result from falls, especially in the context of lightning injury or high-voltage DC current.

Perform cervical spine, chest, and pelvis radiographs on any victim who was previously unconscious. Also, obtain appropriate extremity films in victims with obvious extremity injuries.

Other Tests and Diagnostic Procedures

Record ECG readings in all patients. If smoke inhalation is suspected by history, then arterial blood gases (ABGs) and pulse oximetry may be indicated.

The development of increased myofascial compartment pressures is of great concern. If this is suspected, each compartment must be measured. If signs and symptoms of compartment syndrome exist, decompression is necessary. The hallmark of compartment syndrome is pain with passive motion in the compartment containing the muscle groups responsible for that motion. Characteristically, the pain is unrelenting and may appear out of proportion to the visible injury. Patients may experience paresthesia, hypoesthesia, or decreased motor function. Remember that loss of pulses is a late sign of compartment syndrome.

Medical Therapy

Patients with electrical injury should be initially evaluated as a trauma patient.[8, 27] Airway, breathing, circulation, and inline immobilization of the spine should be performed as a part of primary survey. Maintain a high index of suspicion and evaluate for hidden injuries. Intravenous access, cardiac monitoring, and measurement of oxygen saturation should be started during the primary survey. Fluid replacement is the most important aspect of the initial resuscitation.[28] As with conventional thermal injury, electrical injuries cause massive fluid shifts with extensive tissue damage and acidosis; therefore, monitoring a patient's hemodynamics is important. A Foley catheter is helpful in monitoring urine output and, therefore, tissue perfusion.

Initial fluid resuscitation should aim for urine output of greater than 0.5 cc/kg/h if no signs of myoglobinuria are present and preferably greater than 1 cc/kg/h if myoglobinuria is present. Since lightning burns are usually superficial, using a standard formula, such as the Parkland formula, may be helpful.

The extent or volume of tissue damage involved with an electrical injury is difficult to assess. The unpredictable nature of electrical injuries makes estimating fluid deficits much more difficult. Many authors increase fluid replacement after an electrical injury.

Based on the Parkland formula, increase fluid replacement by 2-3 times, depending on the total surface area potentially involved. For example, increase it by 3 if the surface area is 20% and increase it by 2 (or less) according to an increased percentage of burned skin. These formulas estimate necessary initial resuscitation volume over the first 24 hours (started at the time of the burn).

Use an isotonic balanced saline solution (eg, Ringer's lactate solution) for fluid resuscitation. Closely follow urinary output as an indicator of hemodynamic status and kidney function. Make constant adjustments based on hourly urine output. Decrease or increase fluid rates to maintain urine output of 0.5-1 cc/kg/h.

Installing an indwelling urinary catheter is mandatory. Hematuria or dark urine prompts the need for more aggressive therapy to prevent myoglobin-induced tubular necrosis. This is treated with fluids (initiating diuresis) and bicarbonate.

Administer bicarbonate at 1-2 mEq/kg. With very extensive injuries, expect acidosis and myoglobinuria, and initiate bicarbonate with the initial fluid bolus.

Administer mannitol at 1 gram per kilogram body weight to promote an osmotic diuresis. The target urine output is up to 2-3 mL/kg/h, with a urine pH greater than 6.5. Bicarbonate treats the underlying acidosis and alkalinizes the urine, making myoglobin more soluble.

Additional diuretics may be administered. Acetazolamide is the recognized drug of choice because it also alkalinizes the urine. However, exercise this diuresis with extreme caution to avoid hyperosmotic hypoalbuminemia.

Surgical Therapy

Functional outcome of an electrical burn wound is inversely proportional to the time lapsed before the start of the reconstructive procedure(s).[8, 27]

As part of the nature of the electrical trauma, tissue damage leads to vascular thrombosis and skin and muscle necrosis. This leads to gross limitation on manipulation of local tissues for reconstruction. The optimal management of these wounds has evolved to initial debridement, decompression (fasciotomy), and aggressive planned debridement and early skin coverage with the goal of preserving vital structures.[8, 27]

Fasciotomy serves a dual role as both a therapeutic tool and a diagnostic tool in the treatment of electrical injuries. The fact that a burn with a relatively small surface area may hide massive tissue destruction beneath cannot be overemphasized. Therefore, aggressively evaluate any swelling or signs of impaired circulation.

Impaired circulation to extremities after thermal skin injury may be the result of constrictive eschar, which usually is circumferential and of full thickness. Impaired circulation also may be the result of compartment syndrome, which is caused by edematous muscles.

Volume is limited as a result of the naturally needed fascial compartments. When edema occurs in the same volume compartment, pressures within that compartment rise. Sufficient pressure to occlude venous obstruction easily leads to muscle ischemia, increased edema, and further myonecrosis.

Compartment pressures need not exceed arterial pressures to cause necrosis. Any questionable extremity must be examined in the operating room by removing solid eschar initially, followed by fasciotomy as indicated. A low threshold for fasciotomy is indicated because an early fasciotomy may prevent ischemia and prevent (or at least limit) amputation.

Fasciotomy also serves a diagnostic role. It can be very important in helping determine the extent of muscular necrosis. Frankly debride the necrotic tissue to explore the affected limbs. Repeat assessment, either during the operation or at dressing changes, can help prevent secondary infection. Assess muscle viability with serial technetium scans. If, at second look, additional necrotic tissue is present, further debride the affected extremity. In severe cases, early amputation remains the only safe choice.

Locoregional flaps have served as good alternatives for coverage of electric burn wounds. Alternatives include myocutaneous, fasciocutaneous, and muscle flaps, with a split thickness skin graft serving as an intermediate biological cover or as a definitive procedure.

Operative Details and Follow-up

Preoperative details

Bring patients to the operating room after aggressive resuscitation has reversed shock, assured oxygen delivery, restored circulating volume, and reestablished end-organ perfusion. The patient may need tetanus prophylaxis. Bedside fasciotomy can be performed if the patient is too unstable to go to the operating room.

Intraoperative details

Follow the principles of good surgical technique. Perform fasciotomies following prescribed techniques, and ensure that any at-risk compartment is released. Make every effort to protect marginal tissue.

Postoperative details

Continue aggressive postoperative assessment for myoglobinuria. Local wound care is the surgeon's choice; the authors prefer wet-to-dry gauze dressings changed at twice-daily whirlpool sessions. Consider delayed closure of the fasciotomy site or secondary coverage when appropriate.

Follow-up

Discharge patients with open wounds if adequate wound-care arrangements are available. Follow-up care depends on the nature and extent of the injury. Secondary coverage may be needed, and consulting a plastic or reconstructive surgeon may be helpful.

Author

Brian J Daley, MD, MBA, FACS, FCCP, CNSC, Professor and Program Director, Department of Surgery, Chief, Division of Trauma and Critical Care, University of Tennessee Health Science Center College of Medicine

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Ali Farouk Mallat, MD, MS, FACS, Assistant Professor of Surgery, Akron General Medical Center, Hillcrest Hospital, Cleveland Clinic

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Jose Fernando Aycinena Goicolea, MD, Colorectal Surgeon, The Longstreet Clinic

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Juan J Gallegos, MD, Resident Physician in General Surgery, University of Tennessee Memorial Hospital

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editors

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD, Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Received salary from Medscape for employment. for: Medscape.

Robert L Sheridan, MD, Assistant Chief of Staff, Chief of Burn Surgery, Shriners Burns Hospital; Associate Professor of Surgery, Department of Surgery, Division of Trauma and Burns, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

John Geibel, MD, MSc, DSc, AGAF, Vice Chair and Professor, Department of Surgery, Section of Gastrointestinal Medicine, Professor, Department of Cellular and Molecular Physiology, Yale University School of Medicine; Director of Surgical Research, Department of Surgery, Yale-New Haven Hospital; American Gastroenterological Association Fellow; Fellow of the Royal Society of Medicine

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

The authors and editors of Medscape Reference gratefully acknowledge the contributions of previous coauthor, Joseph McCadams, MD, to the development and writing of this article.

References

  1. Blumenthal R, Jandrell IR, West NJ. Does a sixth mechanism exist to explain lightning injuries?: investigating a possible new injury mechanism to determine the cause of injuries related to close lightning flashes. Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 2012 Sep. 33 (3):222-6. [View Abstract]
  2. Browne BJ, Gaasch WR. Electrical injuries and lightning. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 1992 May. 10(2):211-29. [View Abstract]
  3. Fontanarosa PB. Electrical shock and lightning strike. Ann Emerg Med. 1993 Feb. 22(2 Pt 2):378-87. [View Abstract]
  4. Martinez JA, Nguyen T. Electrical injuries. South Med J. 2000 Dec. 93(12):1165-8. [View Abstract]
  5. Dega S, Gnaneswar SG, Rao PR, Ramani P, Krishna DM. Electrical burn injuries. Some unusual clinical situations and management. Burns. 2007 Aug. 33(5):653-65. [View Abstract]
  6. Fish R. Electric shock, Part II: Nature and mechanisms of injury. J Emerg Med. 1993 Jul-Aug. 11(4):457-62. [View Abstract]
  7. Cooper MA. Electrical and lightning injuries. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 1984 Aug. 2(3):489-501. [View Abstract]
  8. Arnoldo B, Klein M, Gibran NS. Practice guidelines for the management of electrical injuries. J Burn Care Res. 2006 Jul-Aug. 27(4):439-47. [View Abstract]
  9. Leibovici D, Shemer J, Shapira SC. Electrical injuries: current concepts. Injury. 1995 Nov. 26(9):623-7. [View Abstract]
  10. Fish R. Electric shock, Part I: Physics and pathophysiology. J Emerg Med. 1993 May-Jun. 11(3):309-12. [View Abstract]
  11. Lee RC, Zhang D, Hannig J. Biophysical injury mechanisms in electrical shock trauma. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2000. 2:477-509. [View Abstract]
  12. Khor D, AlQasas T, Galet C, et al. Electrical injuries and outcomes: A retrospective review. Burns. 2023 Nov. 49 (7):1739-44. [View Abstract]
  13. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Lightning Strike Victim Data. CDC. Available at https://www.cdc.gov/lightning/data-research/index.html. 2024 Apr 15; Accessed: October 31, 2024.
  14. Sun CF, Lv XX, Li YJ, et al. Epidemiological studies of electrical injuries in Shaanxi province of China: a retrospective report of 383 cases. Burns. 2012 Jun. 38 (4):568-72. [View Abstract]
  15. Baker MD, Chiaviello C. Household electrical injuries in children. Epidemiology and identification of avoidable hazards. Am J Dis Child. 1989 Jan. 143(1):59-62. [View Abstract]
  16. Carleton SC. Cardiac problems associated with electrical injury. Cardiol Clin. 1995 May. 13(2):263-6. [View Abstract]
  17. ten Duis HJ. Acute electrical burns. Semin Neurol. 1995 Dec. 15(4):381-6. [View Abstract]
  18. Romero B, Candell-Riera J, Gracia RM, Fernandez MA, Aguadé S, Peracaula R, et al. Myocardial necrosis by electrocution: evaluation of noninvasive methods. J Nucl Med. 1997 Feb. 38(2):250-1. [View Abstract]
  19. Pilecky D, Vamos M, Bogyi P, et al. Risk of cardiac arrhythmias after electrical accident: a single-center study of 480 patients. Clin Res Cardiol. 2019 Aug. 108 (8):901-8. [View Abstract]
  20. Jacob S, Belli EV. Electric shock-induced coronary artery thrombosis and dissection. Ann Thorac Surg. 2019 Feb. 107 (2):e105-6. [View Abstract]
  21. Jost WH, Schönrock LM, Cherington M. Autonomic nervous system dysfunction in lightning and electrical injuries. NeuroRehabilitation. 2005. 20(1):19-23. [View Abstract]
  22. Fish JS, Theman K, Gomez M. Diagnosis of long-term sequelae after low-voltage electrical injury. J Burn Care Res. 2012 Mar-Apr. 33 (2):199-205. [View Abstract]
  23. Cherington M. Neurorehabilitation of the multifaceted and complicated neurologic problems associated with lightning and electrical injuries. NeuroRehabilitation. 2005. 20(1):1-2. [View Abstract]
  24. Pawlik AM, Lampart A, Stephan FP, Bingisser R, Ummenhofer W, Nickel CH. Outcomes of electrical injuries in the emergency department: a 10-year retrospective study. Eur J Emerg Med. 2016 Dec. 23 (6):448-454. [View Abstract]
  25. Ahmed J, Stenkula C, Omar S, et al. Patient outcomes after electrical injury - a retrospective study. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2021 Aug 6. 29 (1):114. [View Abstract]
  26. Stockly OR, Wolfe AE, Espinoza LF, et al. The impact of electrical injuries on long-term outcomes: A Burn Model System National Database study. Burns. 2020 Mar. 46 (2):352-9. [View Abstract]
  27. Cooper MA. Emergent care of lightning and electrical injuries. Semin Neurol. 1995 Sep. 15(3):268-78. [View Abstract]
  28. Colic M, Ristic L, Jovanovic M. Emergency treatment and early fluid resuscitation following electrical injuries. Acta Chir Plast. 1996. 38(4):137-41. [View Abstract]

Arcing electrical burns through the shoe around the rubber sole. High-voltage (7600 V) alternating current nominal. Note cratering.

Contact electrical burn. This was the ground of a 120-V alternating current nominal circuit. Note vesicle with surrounding erythema. Note thermal and contact electrical burns cannot be distinguished easily.

Contact electrical burns, 120-V alternating current nominal. The right knee was the energized side, and the left was ground. These are contact burns and are difficult to distinguish from thermal burns. Note entrance and exit are not viable concepts in alternating current.

Electrical burns to the hand.

Arcing electrical burns through the shoe around the rubber sole. High-voltage (7600 V) alternating current nominal. Note cratering.

Contact electrical burn. This was the ground of a 120-V alternating current nominal circuit. Note vesicle with surrounding erythema. Note thermal and contact electrical burns cannot be distinguished easily.

Contact electrical burns, 120-V alternating current nominal. The right knee was the energized side, and the left was ground. These are contact burns and are difficult to distinguish from thermal burns. Note entrance and exit are not viable concepts in alternating current.

Electrical burns to the hand.