Neuroblastoma

Back

Practice Essentials

Neuroblastoma (NB) is a poorly differentiated neoplasm derived from neural crest cells. It is the most common cancer in infants and the most common extracranial solid tumor in childhood. Median age at diagnosis is 17 months; 90% of patients are younger than 5 years at diagnosis, and less than 5% are adolescents or adults.[1, 2] Neuroblastoma accounts for 7% of pediatric malignancies but for more than 10% of childhood cancer-related mortality.[3]

Neuroblastomas originate in the adrenal medulla and paraspinal or periaortic regions.[2] Its presentation varies, depending on the primary site of origin, metastatic burden, and metabolically active by-products, but 65% of primary neuroblastomas occur in the abdomen—40% in the adrenal gland—so most children present with abdominal symptoms, such as fullness or distension.

Neuroblastoma is remarkable in that it has a documented spontaneous rate of resolution and is also one of the few tumors in which the surgical capsule can be violated yet a good outcome might be achieved, even if residual tumor is left behind.

Signs and symptoms

Abdominal symptoms such as fullness or distention are the most common symptoms. However, children with localized disease are typically asymptomatic. Children with disseminated neuroblastoma are generally sick and may have systemic manifestations, including the following:

Infants often present with consequences of compression of the sympathetic ganglia in the thoracic region, such as Horner syndrome (myosis, anhydrosis, and ptosis) or superior vena cava syndrome. Older children typically present with abdominal symptoms; the most common physical examination finding is a nontender, firm, irregular abdominal mass that crosses the midline.

See Presentation for more detail.

Diagnosis

Recommended laboratory studies include the following:

Neuron-specific enolase (NSE), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and ferritin are markers useful in the identification of active disease.

Standard diagnostic imaging modalities include the following:

Biopsy is the sine qua non in the diagnostic evaluation of neuroblastoma.

See Workup for more detail.

Treatment

Treatment of neuroblastoma is risk based.[2]

Low-risk neuroblastoma:

Intermediate-risk neuroblastoma:

High-risk neuroblastoma:

See Treatment for more detail.

Background

Virchow first described neuroblastoma in 1864; at that time, it was referred to as a glioma.[4]  In 1891, Marchand histologically linked neuroblastoma to sympathetic ganglia.[5]  More substantial evidence of the neural origins of neuroblastoma became apparent in 1914, when Herxheimer showed that fibrils of the tumor stained positively with special neural silver stains.[6]

In 1927, Cushing and Wolbach further characterized neuroblastoma by describing the transformation of malignant neuroblastoma into its benign counterpart, ganglioneuroma.[7]  Everson and Cole reported that this type of transformation is rare in children older than 6 months.[8]  In 1957, Mason published a report of a child with neuroblastoma whose urine contained pressor amines.[9]  This discovery further contributed to the understanding of neuroblastoma and its possible sympathetic neural origin.

Spontaneous regression of microscopic clusters of neuroblastoma cells, called neuroblastoma in situ, was noted to occur quite commonly. According to Beckwith and Perrin in 1963, regression occurs nearly 40 times more often than clinically apparent neuroblastoma.[10]

Neuroblastoma is one of the small, blue, round cell tumors of childhood. Other such tumors include the following:

Relevant Anatomy

During the fifth week of embryogenesis, primitive sympathetic neuroblasts migrate from the neural crest to the site where the adrenal anlage eventuates into the developing embryo. These neuroblasts migrate along the entire sympathetic chain; therefore, neuroblastoma can arise  anywhere along the sympathetic nervous system, in the adrenal glands and in the paraspinal nerves from the neck to the pelvis.[2] The name neuroblastoma is derived from the fact that the cells resemble primitive neuroblasts.

Pathophysiology

Embryologically, tumors of the sympathetic nervous system differentiate along one of two distinct pathways: the pheochromocytoma line or the sympathoblastoma line.[11] The sympathoblastomas, also called neurocristopathies, include the well-differentiated ganglioneuroma, the moderately differentiated ganglioneuroblastoma, and the malignant neuroblastoma. All of these tumors arise from primordial neural crest cells, which ultimately populate the sympathetic chain and the adrenal medulla.[12]  

Amplification of the MYCN oncogene occurs in 20% of primary neuroblastoma tumors and 50% of high-risk tumors; it is associated with high rates of metastasis and a poor prognosis in children older than 1 year but not in children younger than 1 year.[13] The precise role of MYCN in nonamplified tumors is unknown.

Hyperdiploid tumor DNA is associated with a favorable prognosis. N-myc amplification is associated with a poor prognosis In 2000, Maris et al reported from the Children's Cancer Group (CCG) that 1p deletion independently predicted a lower event-free survival but not overall survival. The clinical relevance of 14q LOH is unclear at this time.

Allelic loss of 11q is present in 35-45% of primary tumors. Notably, this aberration is rarely seen in tumors with MYCN amplification yet remains highly associated with other high-risk features.

Bosse and colleagues identified Glypican-2 (GPC2) as a molecule specifically expressed by neuroblastoma cells and not by normal tissues. GPC2 expression has been detected on the cell surface in the majority of high-risk neuroblastoma, and such expression correlated with worse prognosis of neuroblastoma patients. GPC2 expression is driven by somatic gain of chromosome 7q (where the GPC2 gene is located) and by MYCN amplification. Additionally, Bosse et al developed a GPC2-directed antibody-drug conjugate with a potent cytotoxic activity against GPC2-expressing neuroblastoma cells, which may represent a promising immunotherapeutic target for high-risk neuroblastoma.[14]

Etiology

About 1-2% of patients with neuroblastoma have a family history of the disease. Germline mutations associated with a genetic predisposition to neuroblastoma in these cases include the following[2] :

Increased risk of malignancies including neuroblastoma have been noted in children with various cancer predisposition syndromes, including Costello syndrome, Noonan syndrome, and neurofibromatosis type 1.[15]

Malignant transformation and maintenance of the dedifferentiated state of neural crest cells may result from failure of those cells to respond to normal signals that are responsible for normal morphologic differentiation. The factors involved in the cascade of events are poorly understood but most likely involve one or more ligand-receptor pathways. One of the most studied pathways is the nerve growth factor (NGF) and its receptor (NGFR). The dedifferentiated state of neuroblastoma leads to the variable presentations commonly observed in patients with neuroblastoma.

Environmental and paternal exposures linked to neuroblastoma have not been identified.[16]

Epidemiology

Frequency

Neuroblastoma is the most common cancer in infants. Approximately 700-800 cases are diagnosed each year in the United States, accounting for about 6% of cancers in children.[1] Clinical frequency is approximately one case per 8000-10,000 children.

Neuroblastoma is more common in whites and is slightly more prevalent in boys than in girls (male-to-female ratio of 1.3:1). In rare cases, neuroblastoma is detected by prenatal ultrasound. About 37% of cases are diagnosed in infancy, and nearly 90% of cases are diagnosed before the age of 5 years. Median age at diagnosis is 19 months.[2] Neuroblastoma is rare in people over the age of 10 years.[1] Neuroblastoma is thought to occur sporadically, with 1-2% of cases considered familial.

Prognosis

For more than 40 years, the age at diagnosis and the stage have been the dominant independent variables used as prognostic factors in children with neuroblastoma. In 1984, Shimada et al classified neuroblastoma by relating its histopathologic features to its clinical behavior.[17]  To this end, Shimada et al divided neuroblastoma into favorable and unfavorable categories, depending on the degree of neuroblast differentiation, Schwannian stromal content, mitosis-karyorrhexis index, and age at diagnosis. In 1999, the Shimada classification was modified to the International Neuroblastoma Pathology Classification system.

Because of the various approaches to risk stratification, efforts have been made to develop a consensus approach that will allow comparison of patients around the world. In 2009, the International Neuroblastoma Risk Group (INRG) Task Force published a classification based on the review of a large number of patients from Europe, Japan, the United States, Canada, and Australia diagnosed with neuroblastoma between 1974 and 2002.[18] The Task Force identified the following as the most highly statistically significant and clinically relevant factors:

On the basis of those factors the Task Force identified four broad prognostic clinical categories (see Workup/Risk Groups), which correlated with 5-year event-free survival (EFS) rates as follows[18] :

The Children's Oncology Group (COG) subsequently developed a process called the Neuroblastoma Risk Stratification System (NRSS), which is used for treatment stratification. The NRSS, which was most recently revised in 2021 (see Workup/Risk Groups) classifies patients into low-, intermediate-, or high-risk categories.[19] Five-year EFS and overall survival (OS) rates are as follows:

Other variables carry varying degrees of prognostic significance. These include the site of the primary tumor, serum ferritin levels, neuron-specific enolase (NSE) level, and nutritional status.

History

Neuroblastoma has been called the great mimicker because of its myriad clinical presentations related to the site of the primary tumor, metastatic disease, and its metabolic tumor by-products. Sixty-five percent of primary neuroblastomas occur in the abdomen, with most of these occurring in the adrenal gland. As a result, most children present with abdominal symptoms, such as fullness or distension.

Obtaining a complete history and physical examination are paramount to an accurate diagnosis and subsequent management of neuroblastoma. Eliciting a history of the child's general appearance, recent trauma, changes in appetite and weight, and recurrent abdominal pain is important. Symptoms are usually related to either an abdominal mass or bone pain secondary to metastatic neuroblastoma. Reports of fatigue, bone pain, and changes in bowel or bladder habits may contribute to an accurate diagnosis. Physical findings might include hepatomegaly; blanching subcutaneous nodules; or a large, irregular, firm abdominal mass.

Typically, children with localized disease are asymptomatic, whereas children with disseminated neuroblastoma are generally sick and may have systemic manifestations, including unexplained fevers, weight loss, anorexia, failure to thrive, general malaise, irritability, and bone pain. 

Physical Examination

The most common finding upon physical examination is a nontender, firm, irregular abdominal mass that crosses the midline. In contrast, children who present with Wilms tumor have a smooth mobile flank mass that typically does not cross the midline.

At diagnosis, the site of neuroblastoma is predictably age-dependent. Infants often present with compression of the sympathetic ganglia in the thoracic region, which might result, for example, in Horner syndrome (myosis, anhydrosis, and ptosis) or superior vena cava syndrome. Older children typically present with abdominal symptoms because, as stated above, more than 40% of neuroblastomas are adrenal in origin. Children who are preschool aged should have working differential diagnoses for an abdominal mass, including lymphoma, hepatoblastoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, renal cell carcinoma, and neuroblastoma.

More than 50% of patients who present with neuroblastoma have metastatic disease. The fact that many other syndromes related to metastatic neuroblastoma are also common in these patients is not surprising.

For example, Pepper syndrome occurs in infants with overwhelming metastatic neuroblastoma of the liver that results in respiratory compromise. Described by William Pepper in 1901, Pepper syndrome was identified as a localized primary tumor and metastatic disease limited to the skin, liver, and bone marrow in infants. Pepper syndrome has since been associated with stage 4S neuroblastoma, a unique entity that occurs only in infants younger than 1 year. Pepper syndrome generally confers a better prognosis, as it is associated with spontaneous regression. Some infants with stage 4S neuroblastoma, however, die of massive hepatomegaly, respiratory failure, and overwhelming sepsis.

"Blueberry muffin" babies are infants in whom neuroblastoma has metastasized to random subcutaneous sites. When provoked, the nodules become intensely red and subsequently blanch for several minutes thereafter. The response is probably secondary to the release of vasoconstrictive metabolic tumor by-products. These nodules can be diagnostic of neuroblastoma, but leukemic infiltrates that metastasize to the skin should be considered in the differential diagnoses when these children are evaluated.

Widespread metastasis of neuroblastoma to the bone may result in Hutchinson syndrome, which results in bone pain with consequent limping and pathologic fractures. Neuroblastomas that arise in the paraspinal ganglia may invade through the neural foramina, compress the spinal cord, and subsequently cause paralysis.

Infrequently, neuroblastoma can become metastatic to the retrobulbar region, leading to rapidly progressive, unilateral, painless proptosis; periorbital edema; and ecchymosis of the upper lid. This lesion often can be confused with trauma or child abuse. See the image below.



View Image

Upper periorbital edema, proptosis, and ocular ecchymosis in a 9-month-old girl.

Most neuroblastomas produce catecholamines as metabolic by-products, which result in some of the most interesting presentations observed in children with neuroblastoma. For example, Kerner-Morrison syndrome causes intractable secretory diarrhea, resulting in hypovolemia, hypokalemia, and prostration. This syndrome is caused by vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) tumor secretion and is more commonly associated with ganglioneuroblastoma or ganglioneuroma. Kerner-Morrison syndrome typically resolves following the complete removal of the tumor.

Laboratory Studies

General laboratory studies should be routinely obtained in children suspected of having neuroblastoma. Results are as follows:

Elevated metabolic catecholamine by-products can be detected in the urine of patients with neuroblastoma. The presence of these by-products serves as useful inclusion criteria when the diagnosis of neuroblastoma is being considered.

Phenylalanine and tyrosine are catecholamine precursors, which are converted through a sequence of enzymatic events to dihydroxyphenylalanine (DOPA), dopamine, norepinephrine, and epinephrine. DOPA and dopamine are metabolized into their final product, homovanillic acid (HVA), while norepinephrine and epinephrine are metabolized into vanillylmandelic acid (VMA).

Ninety percent of neuroblastoma tumors secrete these by-products. This fact becomes clinically relevant because children with dedifferentiated tumors excrete higher levels of HVA than VMA. This occurs because dedifferentiated tumors have lost the final enzymatic pathway that converts HVA to VMA. A low VMA-to-HVA ratio is consistent with a poorly differentiated tumor and indicative of a poor prognosis.

Neuroblastoma cells lack the enzyme that converts norepinephrine to epinephrine. Despite this fact, elevated levels of norepinephrine are not identified in the serum of patients with neuroblastoma. This might be explained by at least two processes: (1) norepinephrine may be catabolized within the tumor; and/or (2) tyrosine hydrolase, the initial enzyme in catecholamine synthesis, is subject to a negative feedback loop by norepinephrine.

A LaBrosse VMA spot test may be used to screen patients in certain institutions. It is economical but has low sensitivity and specificity.

High-performance liquid chromatography has a much lower false-positive rate and is more sensitive than the LaBrosse VMA spot test, but it is more expensive and is therefore often used only to confirm a positive result on a spot test.

Nonspecific tumor markers can be identified in patients with neuroblastoma.[20] Neuron-specific enolase (NSE), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and ferritin are markers useful in the identification of active disease, as well as in prognostication. Approximately 96% of patients with metastatic neuroblastomas demonstrate an elevated NSE level, which has been associated with a poor prognosis.

Imaging Studies

Radiographic assessment is recommended in all infants and children with an abdominal mass. The standard diagnostic imaging modalities include the following:

KUB most commonly reveals finely stippled calcifications of the abdomen or posterior mediastinum.

Renal/bladder ultrasonography improves the diagnostic evaluation and is probably the single best imaging modality to obtain. Ultrasonography is noninvasive and provides relevant information regarding the laterality, consistency, and size of the mass.

Abdominal CT scanning or MRI usually follows ultrasonography. Both of these studies are more invasive, in that they require general sedation for young children. The benefit is that they enhance the ultrasonographic findings by providing information about regional lymph nodes, vessel invasion, and distant metastatic disease. See the images below.



View Image

CT scan in a 2-week-old boy noted to have an abdominal mass on a prenatal sonogram. This postnatal abdominal CT scan revealed a left suprarenal mass w....



View Image

Abdominal CT scan in a 2-week-old boy noted to have an abdominal mass on a prenatal sonogram. A postnatal abdominal CT scan revealed a left suprarenal....



View Image

A 2-week-old boy is noted to have an abdominal mass on prenatal ultrasound. A postnatal abdominal CT scan revealed a left suprarenal mass with mass ef....



View Image

Bulky lymph nodes just medial to the left kidney.

Bone scintigraphy and a skeletal survey to detect cortical bone disease are helpful in the diagnosis of neuroblastoma. Metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) is a compound taken up by catecholaminergic cells that competes for uptake even in neuroblastoma cells. In this way, MIBG is quite sensitive and specific in the detection of metastasis to bones and soft tissue, with highest sensitivity (91-97%) in the detection of bone deposits.[21]

Bone scintigraphy using 99Tc diphosphonate and a skeletal bone survey to detect cortical bone disease are essential if MIBG scintigraphy results are negative in the bone. MIBG is recommended for re-assessment both during and after therapy in high-risk patients with MIBG-avid disease at diagnosis.

Expression of somatostatin (SS) receptors has been described in neuroblastoma cell lines and tumors. Studies have shown that these tumors can be successfully targeted with radioactive SS analogs as a method of detection. Currently, the indication for scanning with radio-labeled SS analog in children with neuroblastoma is not well-defined because this method is less sensitive than MIBG scanning (64% vs 94%). However, because the presence of neuroblastoma SS receptors is associated with favorable clinical and biological prognostic factors, radio-labeled SS analog could provide valuable information. In fact, improved survival has been found in patients with SS receptor–positive neuroblastoma. However, more studies need to be performed to confirm the benefits of SS receptor scanning.

Diagnostic Procedures

Biopsy is the sine qua non in the diagnostic evaluation of neuroblastoma. To confirm the diagnosis of neuroblastoma, histologic evidence of neural origin or differentiation is required. Samples of tumor tissue can be viewed via light or electron microscopy or via immunohistochemistry. Although open surgical biopsy has traditionally been advocated, Mullassery and colleagues reported that image-guided needle biopsy can also yield adequate tissue samples.[22]

Another option is to sample bone marrow, a frequent metastatic site for neuroblastoma. The literature is confusing in terms of the number of bone marrow aspirates or biopsies needed to diagnose neuroblastoma. An international committee on neuroblastoma staging has recommended obtaining two bone marrow aspirates and two biopsies, one from each posterior iliac crest.

The issue of biopsies might become obsolete because immunocytology of marrow aspirates may offer the single best source of diagnostic information. A large body of published work has addressed the use of immunocytochemical and polymerase chain reaction (PCR)–based technologies to detect neuroblastoma cells and neuroblastoma-specific transcripts such as tyrosine hydroxylase and disialoganglioside (GD2) synthase in marrow or blood samples.[23] This method is used to assess minimal disease during the course of treatment. Although these techniques can greatly increase sensitivity, whether this increased sensitivity provides prognostic information about the likelihood of relapse is still unclear.

Histologic Findings

The three distinct histologic patterns of the neurocristopathies include neuroblastoma, ganglioneuroblastoma, and ganglioneuroma. They represent a spectrum of maturation and dedifferentiation. The typical neuroblastoma is characterized by small uniform cells that contain dense hyperchromatic nuclei and scant cytoplasm. A neuritic process called neuropil is pathognomonic of all except the most primitive neuroblastoma. Homer-Wright pseudorosettes are clusters of neuroblasts surrounding areas of eosinophilic neuropil and are observed in 15-50% of patients. If identified, they are diagnostic of neuroblastoma.

The minimal diagnostic criteria for diagnosing neuroblastoma have been established by an international group of conferees and corresponding participants. These criteria include (1) unequivocal pathologic diagnosis or (2) unequivocal bone marrow (syncytia) and elevated levels of urinary catecholamine metabolic by-products. Both of these diagnostic criteria require a histopathologic diagnosis.

Molecular pathogenesis

The cancer genes most commonly altered in adult carcinogenesis (eg, TP53, CDKN2A, ras) are rarely aberrant in neuroblastoma. TP53-inactivating mutations are uncommon in primary tumors due to neuroblastoma, although they have been documented in cell lines among patients with relapsing neuroblastoma.[24] Thus, with the exception of MYCN, major pathways of human neoplasia do not seem to be deregulated. Indeed, the only reliable genetically engineered murine model of neuroblastoma results from targeted overexpression of human MYCN copy DNA to the murine neural crest.

Activating mutations in the tyrosine kinase domain of the anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene occur in the majority of hereditary neuroblastoma cases, and also in some sporadic cases of advanced neuroblastoma. Subclonal ALK mutations can be present at diagnosis, with subsequent clonal expansion at relapse.[25]

Staging

At least six different staging systems for neuroblastoma exist. Historically, each staging system represents a temporal improvement in the understanding of the tumor. However, the presence of so many systems has not only confounded the literature but also complicated the comparison of studies between institutions. In 1988, the International Neuroblastoma Staging System (INSS) was established to provide a uniform staging system.[26]

The INSS is a clinical, radiographic, and surgical appraisal of children with neuroblastoma. The system combines many of the most important diagnostic criteria from each of the staging systems and includes initial distribution and surgical resectability of the tumor.

Specific requirements to stage neuroblastoma include the following:

Arabic numerals are used to distinguish INSS staging from other systems. INSS stages are as follows:

Other features of stage 4S include the following:

Stage 4S is the most unusual group, comprising approximately 5% of patients with neuroblastoma. All else being equal, these children would normally be classified as having stage 1 or 2 disease; however, disease in this special group of infants almost always spontaneously regresses. Nonetheless, infants younger than 2 months frequently develop extensive and rapidly progressive intrahepatic expansion of neuroblastoma that can result in respiratory compromise. The 5-year survival rate in patients with stage 4S disease is 75%.

Stage for stage, infants with neuroblastoma have a better prognosis than older children. In fact, statistically, age is the most significant clinical prognosticator for neuroblastoma. Forty percent of infants (< 1 y) have localized neuroblastoma, compared with 20% of children older than 1 year. Additionally, nearly 70% of children older than 1 year have disseminated neuroblastoma, compared with less than 25% of infants.

The INSS is a postsurgical staging system. In 2009, the International Neuroblastoma Risk Group published a pretreatment risk classification system, the International Neuroblastoma Risk Group Staging System (INRGSS).[27] This system classifies neuroblastomas as locoregional (L), based on the absence or presence of one or more of 20 image-defined risk factors (IDRFs), or metastatic (M). Stages are as follows:

Risk Groups

The Children’s Oncology Group (COG) uses the major prognostic factors, including those based on imaging studies, to place children into three risk groups: low, intermediate, and high.[28] COG risk groups are used to guide treatment selection.

In the 2006 version, COG defines low-risk group criteria as follows:

Intermediate-risk group criteria are as follows:

High-risk group criteria are as follows:

The most recent revision of the COG risk group classification, published in 2021, uses the International Neuroblastoma Risk Group Staging System (INRGSS; see Staging) and International Neuroblastoma Pathology Classification (INPC) histology and incorporates loss or gain of a portion of a chromosome arm at 1p or 11q, termed segmental chromosome aberrations (SCA), as an additional genomic biomarker.[19]

Low-risk neuroblastoma criteria comprise the following:

Intermediate-risk neuroblastoma criteria comprise the following:

High-risk neuroblastoma criteria comprise the following:

Approach Considerations

Spontaneous regression of neuroblastoma occurs commonly in infants with asymptomatic, small, low-stage adrenal neuroblastoma detected by screening or during prenatal or incidental ultrasonography. Observation, without surgical intervention or tissue diagnosis, may be a safe option in these patients.[2]

In 1988, the Pediatric Oncology Group (POG) released a prospective study showing that patients with localized neuroblastoma who were treated with surgical extirpation had a 2-year disease-free survival rate of 89%.[29]  Additionally, chemotherapy appeared to offer no advantage when residual disease was present in these patients. Thus, in patients with low-stage favorable disease, surgery is the mainstay of therapy. The primary goals of surgery are as follows: 

  1. Determine an accurate diagnosis
  2. Completely remove all of the primary tumor
  3. Provide accurate surgical staging
  4. Offer adjuvant therapy for delayed primary surgery
  5. Remove residual disease with second-look surgery

As stated above, surgery plays a major role in children with low-stage disease. It has a controversial role in children with advanced disease, especially as it applies to the extent of surgical resection. A multimodal approach is suggested for the management of children with advanced neuroblastoma. Multiple-agent chemotherapy has increased the 5-year survival rate to 75% in patients younger than 1 year. Radiation therapy has been shown to produce superior initial and long-term disease control when administered synergistically with chemotherapy. In any event, follow-up of these patients follows a clear POG protocol.

Adult-onset neuroblastoma is rare, and there is no established therapy for it. Anti-disialoganglioside (anti-GD2) immunotherapy may be beneficial in these patients.[30]

For relapsed high-risk neuroblastoma, studies have reported response to a variety of chemotherapy regimens. However, the most effective therapeutic strategy for these patients has not been determined.[31]

Medical Therapy

Because surgery is used to manage only low-stage (stages I and II) neuroblastoma, multiple-agent chemotherapy is the conventional therapy for patients with more advanced stages of neuroblastoma. Interestingly, infants with disseminated neuroblastoma have favorable outcomes with combined chemotherapy and surgery. In contrast, children older than 1 year with high-stage neuroblastoma have very poor survival rates despite intensive multimodal therapy.[32]

Because of these findings, pioneering work in Japan during the 1980s claimed that aggressive screening of infants younger than 6 months with urinary catecholamines could detect neuroblastoma earlier and lead to better outcomes. However, follow-up population-based, controlled trials in Europe and North America did not confirm the benefit of early screening reported in the Japanese studies.

Despite these contradictory findings, symptomatic treatments are available for patients with neuroblastoma. Adrenocortical hormone (ACTH) is thought to be fairly efficacious, although some cases are resistant. Plasmapheresis and gamma globulin have been used in the treatment of selected patients with neuroblastoma, but chemotherapeutic agents are thought to result in better neurological outcomes.

Commonly used chemotherapeutic agents include cisplatin, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, and the epipodophyllotoxins (teniposide and etoposide). Drug combination protocols have used strategies that take advantage of drug synergism, mechanisms of toxicity, and differences of adverse effects.

A randomized, multi-arm, open-label, phase 3 trial in children with high-risk neuroblastoma who had an adequate response to induction treatment found that busulfan plus melphalan improved event-free survival and caused fewer severe adverse events than did carboplatin, etoposide, and melphalan. The 3-year event-free survival was 50% (95% confidence index [CI] 45-56%) with busulfan plus melphalan versus 38% (95% CI, 32-43%; P=0.0005) with carboplatin, etoposide, and melphalan. The researchers concluded that busulfan and melphalan should be considered standard high-dose chemotherapy.[33]

Despite these various drug combinations, the cure rate has not been significantly affected. The long-term survival in patients with metastatic neuroblastoma is poor, perhaps because of the abundance of nonproliferating tumor cells. However, chemotherapeutic agents used to manage neuroblastoma have reduced the size of the primary tumor, occasionally sterilized the bone marrow, and, rarely, transformed the neuroblastoma into benign ganglioneuroma.

Current trends in chemotherapy for the management of neuroblastoma include (1) more dose-intensive chemotherapy with secondary surgical extirpation, (2) myeloablative therapy using escalating chemotherapeutic combinations followed by autologous bone marrow infusion, and (3) biologic response modifiers that cause tumor differentiation and a reduction in tumor involvement of the bone marrow. Some of these seminal chemotherapeutic trials have demonstrated promising results. Multimodal therapeutic protocols established by the POG are the standard of care in children with neuroblastoma.

Topotecan, a topoisomerase I inhibitor, alone or in combination with cyclophosphamide, has been shown to have activity against recurrent neuroblastoma. A Thai study reported a favorable treatment response with minimal toxicity in 107 patients with high-risk neuroblastoma who received six cycles of the following induction regimen[34] :

However, a European open-label, multicenter, prospective randomized controlled trial in 422 patients with high-risk neuroblastoma reported disappointing results with the addition of two courses of topotecan, cyclophosphamide, and etoposide to six courses of standard induction chemotherapy. Patients receiving the additional courses did not have significantly improved event-free or overall survival, and they experienced a higher number of toxic adverse effects.[35]

Retinoids (natural and synthetic derivatives of vitamin A) have been shown in vitro to down-regulate MYCN mRNA expression, which arrests tumor cell proliferation. These observations have led to clinical trials designed to test the efficacy of 13-cis-retinoic acid in children with relapsed neuroblastoma. In phase I and II trials, results were disappointing in patients with a high tumor burden; however, in patients with minimal disease, randomized phase III trials involving 13-cis RA resulted in improved survival rates.[36]  

Anti-disialoganglioside monoclonal antibodies

In 2015, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved dinutuximab (Unituxin), which is a monoclonal antibody against disialoganglioside (anti-GD2), for use in the treatment of pediatric patients with high-risk neuroblastoma. It was approved for use as part of a multimodality regimen in patients who have achieved at least a partial response to prior first-line multiagent treatment. Dinutuximab is indicated in combination with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), interleukin-2 (IL-2), and 13-cis-retinoic acid. Improvement in both event-free survival and overall survival has been shown to be significant.[37]

Naxitamab (Danyelza), a humanized anti-GD2 monoclonal antibody, was granted accelerated approval by the FDA for use in combination with GM-CSF for relapsed or refractory high-risk neuroblastoma in bone or bone marrow demonstrating a partial response, minor response, or stable disease with prior therapy, in adults and in pediatric patients age 1 year or older.

Approval of naxitamab was based on two single-arm open-label studies, Study 201 and Study 12-230. In Study 201, the overall response rate (ORR) 45% (95% CI: 24%, 68%) and duration of response (DOR) ≥6 months was 30%. In Study 12-230, the ORR was 34% (95% CI: 20%, 51%) with 23% of patients having a DOR ≥6 months. For both trials, responses were observed in bone, bone marrow, or both.[38]  

Eflornithine 

Oral eflornithine (Iwilfin) was approved by the FDA in December 2023 to reduce the risk of relapse in adult and pediatric patients with high-risk neuroblastoma who have demonstrated at least a partial response to prior multiagent, multimodality therapy including anti-GD2 immunotherapy.[39]

Eflornithine is an irreversible inhibitor of the enzyme ornithine decarboxylase (ODC), the first and rate-limiting enzyme in biosynthesis of polyamines and a transcriptional target of MYCN

Inhibiting polyamine synthesis restores balance of the LIN28/Let-7 metabolic pathway, which is involved in regulation of cancer stem cells and glycolytic metabolism, by decreasing expression of the oncogenic drivers MYCN and LIN28B in MYCN-amplified neuroblastoma. 

Approval was supported for postimmunotherapy maintenance of high-risk neuroblastoma from patients who received eflornithine following standard up-front or refractory/relapse treatment. Eflornithine after completion of immunotherapy was associated with improved event-free survival (P = 0.008) and overall survival (P = 0.007) compared with historical controls who received other therapies.[40]

Other therapies

Because neuroblastoma is often a radiation-sensitive systemic disease, interest has arisen in use of radioactive molecules that are selectively concentrated in neuroblastoma cells. Clinical trials have been conducted in Europe and North America to delineate the efficacy of iodine-131–radiolabeled meta-iodobenzylguanidine (131I-MIBG), with and without combined myeloablative chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell rescue. Determining the optimal doses, schedules, and timing of MIBG therapy are the goals of these clinical trials. Initially studied in relapsed or refractory neuroblastoma, 131I-MIBG has subsequently drawn interest for use as first-line therapy, alone or in combination with chemotherapeutic drugs.[41, 42]

Antiangiogenesis therapy has more than a theoretical role in the treatment of neuroblastoma. In fact, preclinical studies have demonstrated that these agents inhibit neuroblastoma growth in vivo, especially in minimal residual disease states. Phase I protocols testing angiogenesis inhibitors are in progress to determine whether highly vascular neuroblastoma tumors respond to these agents.

In vitro cultures demonstrate that neuroblastoma is radiosensitive, but results from clinical trials have been inconsistent and inconclusive. As a primary treatment modality, radiation therapy has a limited yet well-defined role.[43] Indications include the following:

Other immunotherapies that have shown promising results against neuroblastoma include the following:

Opsoclonus-myoclonus syndrome in neuroblastoma

Opsoclonus-myoclonus syndrome (OMS) is thought to be immune-mediated, because 60% of patients who develop this in association with neuroblastoma respond to ACTH or corticosteroids. However, the need for more comprehensive treatment of OMS was demonstrated by long-term outcomes in those patients, which included recurrent neurologic symptoms, developmental delay, and intellectual disability.[44]

Improved long-term results have been demonstrated in patients with neuroblastoma who develop OMS when they are treated with multimodal chemotherapy. A prospective randomized trial in 53 children with opsoclonus-myoclonus ataxia syndrome associated with neuroblastoma found that the addition of intravenous immune globulin (IVIG) to prednisone and risk-adapted chemotherapy significantly improves the response rate.[45]

Surgical Therapy

In 1988, the Pediatric Oncology Group (POG) released a prospective study showing that patients with localized neuroblastoma who were treated by surgical extirpation had a 2-year disease-free survival rate of 89%.[29] Additionally, chemotherapy appeared to offer no advantage in patients with residual disease. Thus, in patients with low-stage favorable disease, surgery is the mainstay of therapy. The primary goals of surgery are as follows:

  1. Determine an accurate diagnosis
  2. Completely remove all of the primary tumor
  3. Provide accurate surgical staging
  4. Offer adjuvant therapy for delayed primary surgery
  5. Remove residual disease with second-look surgery

Neuroblastoma metastatic to the paraspinal region may extend through the vertebral foramina and may manifest as cord compression. This occurs in 7-15% of patients with neuroblastoma. Cord compression is a medical emergency and should be treated aggressively to reduce the risk of neurological deficit. Unfortunately, the optimal treatment for cord compression secondary to metastatic neuroblastoma has yet to be determined.

Options to relieve cord compression in these situations include surgical resection with or without laminectomy, multimodal chemotherapy, and external beam radiation therapy. In a retrospective review of the POG experience, chemotherapy and laminectomy were associated with similar rates of neurologic recovery, although laminectomy was associated with more orthopedic morbidity. Given these results, a conservative, primary medical approach might be the best initial therapy, with laminectomy reserved for patients who do not respond to chemotherapy.

Neuroblastoma continues to be one of the most frustrating childhood tumors to manage. Although the tumor has been studied extensively and great efforts have been made to secure appropriate therapy and achieve a cure, little has altered the prognosis in affected children over the past 20 years. Additionally, some pediatric retroperitoneal tumors cannot be determined accurately before surgery. Therefore, surgeons who treat these children must be conversant with current staging systems and treatment modalities.

Preoperative Details

An adequate history and physical examination are essential to the preoperative screening in a child being evaluated for neuroblastoma. All radiographic studies (chest radiography, bone scanning, CT scanning, MRI) should be reviewed. Serum chemistries and a CBC count are essential. Additional blood studies include measurement of vanillylmandelic acid–to–homovanillic acid (VMA-to-HVA) ratio, serum ferritin, and neuron-specific enolase (NSE). Other studies specific to the child being evaluated include obtaining bone marrow aspirate and biopsy specimens, MCYN oncogene copy number of tumor, and chromosome studies or transketolase (TRK) analysis.

A general bowel preparation and a antimicrobial prophylaxis with a third-generation cephalosporin are used, depending on the clinical stage of the tumor.

All children with suspected neuroblastoma should undergo anesthetic evaluation. However, unlike in pheochromocytoma (in which the anesthetic choice is crucial), neuroblastoma does not require a specific anesthetic protocol. In patients with large or complicated tumors, an ICU bed should be obtained for postoperative management.

Intraoperative Details

Adequate exposure in the child with neuroblastoma is paramount. In order to achieve this goal, the surgeon must adhere to a number of principles. The patient should be in the supine position, with all pressure points padded. Excellent light sources should be available, including main operating room (OR) lights, overhanging OR lights, and individual head lights, as needed. Various surgical incisions are available, and any surgeon operating on an adrenal mass should be familiar with them prior to surgery. Finally, the surgeon should be intimately familiar with the anatomy of the adrenal gland, surrounding organs, and their respective blood supplies.

The type of incision is partially dictated by the mass and certainly is at the discretion of the operating surgeon. For most abdominal neuroblastomas, a midline transperitoneal incision provides excellent exposure to the peritoneal cavity, retroperitoneum, and, specifically, the ipsilateral suprarenal area. Other incisions for this particular surgery include an upper transverse abdominal incision or a chevron incision for tumors that involve the upper abdomen and retroperitoneum.

Knowledge of the metastatic properties unique to neuroblastoma helps to understand the protocol for safe abdominal exploration and extirpation. The viscera are reflected to the midline and secured in an intestinal bag. The abdomen and retroperitoneum are explored. Careful attention must be given to the anatomical relationships of the tumor to the surrounding structures because this dictates the possible extirpative field. To complete the protocol, regional lymph nodes are evaluated, and a biopsy specimen is obtained from the liver.

Surgical management is dictated by the staging laparotomy. If the tumor cannot be removed primarily, a wedge biopsy of the tumor may be performed for histopathology, immunohistochemistry, and genetic studies. Proper surgical techniques are used to prevent excessive bleeding and tumor spillage.

If the staging laparotomy reveals that primary resection of the tumor is tenable, attention is turned to removal of the tumor. Neuroblastoma is known to invade the tunica adventitia of large blood vessels; therefore, the surgeon should have a vascular set and take precautions to obtain distal and proximal control of the major blood vessels. A preoperative consultation with a vascular specialist should be considered for large tumors.

Access to the tumor is gained by starting in a distal subadventitial plane and dissecting proximally. In this plane, the anterior abdominal aorta, inferior and superior mesenteric arteries, and celiac arteries are identified, isolated, and preserved (as much as possible). In cases in which the renal hilum is involved with tumor, an ipsilateral nephrectomy is performed. Other attachments to the tumor are released and the tumor can be delivered to the surface.

Proper surgical principles and techniques are critical; otherwise, the risk of morbidity and mortality is high.

Postoperative Details

Postoperative treatment in a child who has undergone a major abdominal exploration and extirpation is dictated, in part, by the extent of resection, duration of surgery, and possible intraoperative complications. The most common complication associated with the removal of a neuroblastoma is related to vascular injury. Hypotension may lead to acute kidney injury and an ischemic bowel, which must be addressed appropriately in an intensive care setting.

Complications

Surgical complication rates in patients with neuroblastoma range from 5-25%, depending on the stage of the tumor. More aggressive primary abdominal extirpations carry the highest complication rate. Incidental nephrectomy or splenectomy, operative hemorrhage, postoperative intussusception, and injury to major vessels or nerves are some of the more common complications associated with high-stage tumors. Infants with neuroblastoma enjoy a significant survival advantage over all other age groups. Aggressive treatment in these children is therefore warranted only when they have complications related to tumor burden (as in Pepper syndrome), coagulopathy, and renal compromise.

Intensive multimodal treatment in patients with neuroblastoma has resulted in improved survival rates. However, the late effects, which can have diverse and devastating manifestations, should be considered. Cancer survivors should be monitored closely in multidisciplinary clinics, with emphasis on long-term sequelae. Surgery and radiation therapy can result in many late orthopedic effects, such as scoliosis, osteoporosis, and hypoplasia of bony and soft tissue structures. Chemotherapeutic regimens used to treat neuroblastoma may result in long-term toxicities, including cardiopulmonary toxicities (anthracyclines), ototoxicity (cisplatin), chronic kidney disease (ifosfamide and cisplatin), infertility and erectile dysfunction (alkylating agents and radiation therapy), secondary cancers, and psychological effects.

Medication Summary

The goals of pharmacotherapy are to induce remission, reduce morbidity, and prevent complications. 

Eflornithine (Iwilfin)

Clinical Context:  Blocks the action of the enzyme ornithine decarboxylase (ODC), which is involved in mechanisms by which genes may promote uncontrolled tumor growth. This effect may inhibit the rate of cancer growth. 

Cisplatin (Kemoplat)

Clinical Context:  Platinum coordination compound that inhibits DNA synthesis, cross-links and denatures strands of DNA and disrupts DNA function by covalently binding to DNA bases

Doxorubicin (Adriamycin)

Clinical Context:  Multiple mechanisms of action are recognized for doxorubicin (eg, DNA intercalation, topoisomerase-mediated DNA strand breaks, oxidative damage by free radical production).

Cyclophosphamide

Clinical Context:  This agent exerts its cytotoxic effect through alkylation of DNA, which leads to interstrand and intrastrand DNA crosslinks, DNA-protein crosslinks, and inhibition of DNA replication.

Teniposide

Clinical Context:  Semisynthetic podophyllotixin derivative which inhibits topoisomerase II to cause DNA strand breaks by inhibiting DNA strand-passing and DNA ligase activity., Prevents cells from entering mytosis by delaying the transit of cells through the S phase and causing arrest in late S or early G2 phase of the cell cycle.

Etoposide

Clinical Context:  A glycosidic derivative of podophyllotoxin that exerts a cytotoxic effect by stabilizing the normally transient covalent intermediates formed between the DNA substrate and topoisomerase II. The drug leads to single-stranded and double-stranded DNA breaks that arrest cellular proliferation in the late S or early G2 phase of cell cycle.

Busulfan (Busulfex, Myleran)

Clinical Context:  As an alkylating agent, the mechanism of action of active metabolites may involve cross-linking of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA), which may interfere with the growth of normal and neoplastic cells.

Melphalan (Evomela)

Clinical Context:  Melphalan is an alkylating agent and derivative of mechlorethamine which inhibits mitosis by cross-linking DNA strands. It is indicated in low doses for the palliative treatment of multiple myeloma and is given in high doses for stem cell transplantation.

Topotecan (Hycamtin)

Clinical Context:  Topotecan binds to topoisomerase I aggregate, preventing the religation of the cleaved DNA strand by stabilizing cleavable complex. This results in the accumulation of single-strand breaks and subsequently in apoptosis and cell death. Acts in the S phase of the cell cycle. 

Naxitamab (Danyelza)

Clinical Context:  Induces antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity and complement-mediated cytotoxicity by binding to cell-surface glycolipids disialoganglioside (GD2), which is highly expressed in neuroblastoma and other cells of neuroectodermal origin, subsequently inducing cell lysis.

Aldesleukin (Interleukin 2, Proleukin)

Clinical Context:  Activates T cells and amplifies their responses. IL-2 enhances antitumor activity of NK cells and cytotoxic T cells. 

Class Summary

Antineoplastic agents are used to reduce tumor burden and induce remission. This may be accomplished, among other things, by reducing angiogenesis and metastasis. Choice of antineoplastic may depend on tumor type and stage.

Author

Byron D Joyner, MD, MPA, Vice Dean for Graduate Medical Education and Designated Institutional Official Professor, Department of Urology, University of Washington School of Medicine; Pediatric Urologist, Seattle Children's Hospital

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editors

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD, Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Received salary from Medscape for employment. for: Medscape.

Chief Editor

Brian H Kopell, MD, Associate Professor, Department of Neurosurgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai; Director, Center for Neuromodulation, Co-Director, The Bonnie and Tom Strauss Movement Disorders Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Mount Sinai Health System

Disclosure: Received income in an amount equal to or greater than $250 from: Medtronic; Abbott Neuromodulation; Turing Medical.

Acknowledgements

Natalya Lopushnyan Yale University School of Medicine

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

References

  1. Key Statistics About Neuroblastoma. American Cancer Society. Available at https://www.cancer.org/cancer/neuroblastoma/about/key-statistics.html. April 28, 2021; Accessed: January 31, 2024.
  2. PDQ Pediatric Treatment Editorial Board. Neuroblastoma Treatment (PDQ®): Health Professional Version. August 22, 2023. [View Abstract]
  3. Irwin MS, Park JR. Neuroblastoma: Paradigm for Precision Medicine. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2015 Feb. 62(1):225-256. [View Abstract]
  4. Virchow R. Hyperplasie der Zirbel und der Nebennieren. Die Krankhaften Geschwulste. Vol 2: 1864-65.
  5. Marchand F. Beitrage zur Kenntniss der normalen und pathologischen Anatomie der Glandula carotica und der Nebennieren. Festschrift fur Ruduloph. Vichows Arch. 1891. 5:578.
  6. Herxheimer G. Ueber Turmoren des Nebennierenmarkes, insbesondere das Neuroblastoma sympaticum. Beitr Pathol Anat. 1914. 57:112.
  7. Cushing H, Wolback SB. The transformation of a malignant paravertebral sympathicoblastoma into a benign ganglioneuoma. Am J Pathol. 1927. 3:203.
  8. Everson TC, Cole WH. Spontaneous regression of neuroblastoma. Everson TC, Cole WH, eds. Spontaneous Regression of Cancer. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders; 1966. 88.
  9. Mason GA, Hart-Mercer J, Millar EJ, Strang LB, Wynne NA. Adrenaline-secreting neuroblastoma in an infant. Lancet. 1957 Aug 17. 273(6990):322-5. [View Abstract]
  10. Beckwith JB, Perrin EV. In situ neuroblastomas: A contribution to the natural history of neural crest tumors. Am J Pathol. 1963 Dec. 43:1089-104. [View Abstract]
  11. Knudson AG Jr, Strong LC. Mutation and cancer: neuroblastoma and pheochromocytoma. Am J Hum Genet. 1972 Sep. 24(5):514-32. [View Abstract]
  12. Bosse KR, Maris JM. Advances in the translational genomics of neuroblastoma: From improving risk stratification and revealing novel biology to identifying actionable genomic alterations. Cancer. 2016 Jan 1. 122 (1):20-33. [View Abstract]
  13. Powers JT, Tsanov KM, Pearson DS, Roels F, Spina CS, Ebright R, et al. Multiple mechanisms disrupt the let-7 microRNA family in neuroblastoma. Nature. 2016 Jul 14. 535 (7611):246-51. [View Abstract]
  14. Bosse KR, Raman P, Zhu Z, et al. Identification of GPC2 as an Oncoprotein and Candidate Immunotherapeutic Target in High-Risk Neuroblastoma. Cancer Cell. 2017 Sep 11. 32 (3):295-309.e12. [View Abstract]
  15. Barr EK, Applebaum MA. Genetic Predisposition to Neuroblastoma. Children (Basel). 2018 Aug 31. 5 (9):[View Abstract]
  16. Mallepalli S, Gupta MK, Vadde R. Neuroblastoma: An Updated Review on Biology and Treatment. Curr Drug Metab. 2019. 20 (13):1014-1022. [View Abstract]
  17. Shimada H, Chatten J, Newton WA Jr, et al. Histopathologic prognostic factors in neuroblastic tumors: definition of subtypes of ganglioneuroblastoma and an age-linked classification of neuroblastomas. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1984 Aug. 73(2):405-16. [View Abstract]
  18. Cohn SL, Pearson AD, London WB, Monclair T, Ambros PF, Brodeur GM, et al. The International Neuroblastoma Risk Group (INRG) classification system: an INRG Task Force report. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Jan 10. 27 (2):289-97. [View Abstract]
  19. Irwin MS, Naranjo A, Zhang FF, Cohn SL, London WB, Gastier-Foster JM, et al. Revised Neuroblastoma Risk Classification System: A Report From the Children's Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol. 2021 Oct 10. 39 (29):3229-3241. [View Abstract]
  20. Stigliani S, Coco S, Moretti S, Oberthuer A, Fischer M, Theissen J, et al. High genomic instability predicts survival in metastatic high-risk neuroblastoma. Neoplasia. 2012 Sep. 14(9):823-32. [View Abstract]
  21. Rufini V, Calcagni ML, Baum RP. Imaging of neuroendocrine tumors. Semin Nucl Med. 2006 Jul. 36(3):228-47. [View Abstract]
  22. Mullassery D, Sharma V, Salim A, Jawaid WB, Pizer BL, Abernethy LJ, et al. Open versus needle biopsy in diagnosing neuroblastoma. J Pediatr Surg. 2014 Oct. 49(10):1505-7. [View Abstract]
  23. Beiske K, Burchill SA, Cheung IY, Hiyama E, Seeger RC, Cohn SL, et al. Consensus criteria for sensitive detection of minimal neuroblastoma cells in bone marrow, blood and stem cell preparations by immunocytology and QRT-PCR: recommendations by the International Neuroblastoma Risk Group Task Force. Br J Cancer. 2009 May 19. 100 (10):1627-37. [View Abstract]
  24. Van Maerken T, Vandesompele J, Rihani A, De Paepe A, Speleman F. Escape from p53-mediated tumor surveillance in neuroblastoma: switching off the p14(ARF)-MDM2-p53 axis. Cell Death Differ. 2009 Dec. 16(12):1563-72. [View Abstract]
  25. Schleiermacher G, Javanmardi N, Bernard V, Leroy Q, Cappo J, Rio Frio T, et al. Emergence of new ALK mutations at relapse of neuroblastoma. J Clin Oncol. 2014 Sep 1. 32(25):2727-34. [View Abstract]
  26. Brodeur GM, Seeger RC, Barrett A, et al. International criteria for diagnosis, staging, and response to treatment in patients with neuroblastoma. J Clin Oncol. 1988 Dec. 6(12):1874-81. [View Abstract]
  27. Monclair T, Brodeur GM, Ambros PF, Brisse HJ, Cecchetto G, Holmes K, et al. The International Neuroblastoma Risk Group (INRG) staging system: an INRG Task Force report. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Jan 10. 27 (2):298-303. [View Abstract]
  28. Neuroblastoma Risk Groups. American Cancer Society. Available at https://www.cancer.org/cancer/types/neuroblastoma/detection-diagnosis-staging/risk-groups.html. April 28, 2021; Accessed: December 18, 2023.
  29. Nitschke R, Smith EI, Shochat S, et al. Localized neuroblastoma treated by surgery: a Pediatric Oncology Group Study. J Clin Oncol. 1988 Aug. 6(8):1271-9. [View Abstract]
  30. Suzuki M, Kushner BH, Kramer K, Basu EM, Roberts SS, Hammond WJ, et al. Treatment and outcome of adult-onset neuroblastoma. Int J Cancer. 2018 Sep 1. 143 (5):1249-1258. [View Abstract]
  31. Herd F, Basta NO, McNally RJQ, Tweddle DA. A systematic review of re-induction chemotherapy for children with relapsed high-risk neuroblastoma. Eur J Cancer. 2019 Feb 26. 111:50-58. [View Abstract]
  32. Gains J, Mandeville H, Cork N, Brock P, Gaze M. Ten challenges in the management of neuroblastoma. Future Oncol. 2012 Jul. 8(7):839-58. [View Abstract]
  33. Ladenstein R, Pötschger U, Pearson ADJ, et al. Busulfan and melphalan versus carboplatin, etoposide, and melphalan as high-dose chemotherapy for high-risk neuroblastoma (HR-NBL1/SIOPEN): an international, randomised, multi-arm, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2017 Apr. 18 (4):500-514. [View Abstract]
  34. Rujkijyanont P, Photia A, Traivaree C, Monsereenusorn C, Anurathapan U, Seksarn P, et al. Clinical outcomes and prognostic factors to predict treatment response in high risk neuroblastoma patients receiving topotecan and cyclophosphamide containing induction regimen: a prospective multicenter study. BMC Cancer. 2019 Oct 16. 19 (1):961. [View Abstract]
  35. Berthold F, Faldum A, Ernst A, et al. Extended induction chemotherapy does not improve the outcome for high-risk neuroblastoma patients: results of the randomized open-label GPOH trial NB2004-HR. Ann Oncol. 2020 Mar. 31 (3):422-429. [View Abstract]
  36. Bayeva N, Coll E, Piskareva O. Differentiating Neuroblastoma: A Systematic Review of the Retinoic Acid, Its Derivatives, and Synergistic Interactions. J Pers Med. 2021 Mar 16. 11 (3):[View Abstract]
  37. Yu AL, Gilman AL, Ozkaynak MF, London WB, Kreissman SG, Chen HX, et al. Anti-GD2 antibody with GM-CSF, interleukin-2, and isotretinoin for neuroblastoma. N Engl J Med. 2010 Sep 30. 363(14):1324-34. [View Abstract]
  38. FDA grants accelerated approval to naxitamab for high-risk neuroblastoma in bone or bone marrow. Food and Drug Administration. Available at https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-approvals-and-databases/fda-grants-accelerated-approval-naxitamab-high-risk-neuroblastoma-bone-or-bone-marrow. November 27, 2020; Accessed: December 18, 2023.
  39. FDA approves eflornithine for adult and pediatric patients with high-risk neuroblastoma. U.S. Food & Drug Administration. Available at https://www.fda.gov/drugs/resources-information-approved-drugs/fda-approves-eflornithine-adult-and-pediatric-patients-high-risk-neuroblastoma. December 14, 2023; Accessed: January 31, 2024.
  40. Oesterheld J, Ferguson W, Kraveka JM, Bergendahl G, Clinch T, Lorenzi E, et al. Eflornithine as Postimmunotherapy Maintenance in High-Risk Neuroblastoma: Externally Controlled, Propensity Score-Matched Survival Outcome Comparisons. J Clin Oncol. 2023 Oct 26. JCO2202875. [View Abstract]
  41. Mastrangelo S, Romano A, Attinà G, Maurizi P, Ruggiero A. Timing and chemotherapy association for 131-I-MIBG treatment in high-risk neuroblastoma. Biochem Pharmacol. 2023 Oct. 216:115802. [View Abstract]
  42. Buckley SE, Chittenden SJ, Saran FH, Meller ST, Flux GD. Whole-body dosimetry for individualized treatment planning of 131I-MIBG radionuclide therapy for neuroblastoma. J Nucl Med. 2009 Sep. 50(9):1518-24. [View Abstract]
  43. Pai Panandiker AS, Beltran C, Billups CA, McGregor LM, Furman WL, Davidoff AM. Intensity modulated radiation therapy provides excellent local control in high-risk abdominal neuroblastoma. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2012 Sep 28. [View Abstract]
  44. Russo C, Cohn SL, Petruzzi MJ, de Alarcon PA. Long-term neurologic outcome in children with opsoclonus-myoclonus associated with neuroblastoma: a report from the Pediatric Oncology Group. Med Pediatr Oncol. 1997 Apr. 28(4):284-8. [View Abstract]
  45. de Alarcon PA, Matthay KK, London WB, Naranjo A, Tenney SC, Panzer JA, et al. Intravenous immunoglobulin with prednisone and risk-adapted chemotherapy for children with opsoclonus myoclonus ataxia syndrome associated with neuroblastoma (ANBL00P3): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2018 Jan. 2 (1):25-34. [View Abstract]
  46. Nuchtern JG, London WB, Barnewolt CE, Naranjo A, McGrady PW, Geiger JD, et al. A prospective study of expectant observation as primary therapy for neuroblastoma in young infants: a Children's Oncology Group study. Ann Surg. 2012 Oct. 256 (4):573-80. [View Abstract]

Upper periorbital edema, proptosis, and ocular ecchymosis in a 9-month-old girl.

CT scan in a 2-week-old boy noted to have an abdominal mass on a prenatal sonogram. This postnatal abdominal CT scan revealed a left suprarenal mass with mass effect of the spleen.

Abdominal CT scan in a 2-week-old boy noted to have an abdominal mass on a prenatal sonogram. A postnatal abdominal CT scan revealed a left suprarenal mass with mass effect of the spleen (see the previous image). This abdominal CT scan represents a more caudal view. Note the very large left mass with central necrosis. The mass effect of the spleen is apparent.

A 2-week-old boy is noted to have an abdominal mass on prenatal ultrasound. A postnatal abdominal CT scan revealed a left suprarenal mass with mass effect of the spleen (see the first image above). A more caudal view revealed the very large left mass with central necrosis (see the second image above). This is a more caudal view of the CT scan than in the previous 2 images. The left kidney comes into view, as it is inferiorly displaced and laterally rotated by the large superior neuroblastoma.

Bulky lymph nodes just medial to the left kidney.

CT scan in a 2-week-old boy noted to have an abdominal mass on a prenatal sonogram. This postnatal abdominal CT scan revealed a left suprarenal mass with mass effect of the spleen.

Abdominal CT scan in a 2-week-old boy noted to have an abdominal mass on a prenatal sonogram. A postnatal abdominal CT scan revealed a left suprarenal mass with mass effect of the spleen (see the previous image). This abdominal CT scan represents a more caudal view. Note the very large left mass with central necrosis. The mass effect of the spleen is apparent.

A 2-week-old boy is noted to have an abdominal mass on prenatal ultrasound. A postnatal abdominal CT scan revealed a left suprarenal mass with mass effect of the spleen (see the first image above). A more caudal view revealed the very large left mass with central necrosis (see the second image above). This is a more caudal view of the CT scan than in the previous 2 images. The left kidney comes into view, as it is inferiorly displaced and laterally rotated by the large superior neuroblastoma.

Bulky lymph nodes just medial to the left kidney.

Upper periorbital edema, proptosis, and ocular ecchymosis in a 9-month-old girl.