CBRNE - Mustard Agents - Hd, Hn1-3, H

Back

Practice Essentials

Mustard agents are vesicants (blistering agents) used in warfare to produce casualties, deny access to areas on the battlefield, and slow down enemy movement by forcing troops to wear full protective equipment. Mustard agents are alkylating compounds that cause damage to the eyes, skin, and respiratory tract. There are different types of mustard agents, including sulfur mustard (H, HD, HT), nitrogen mustards (Hn-1, Hn-2, Hn-3), and mustard-lewisite (HL). Sulfur mustard is used as a chemical weapon, while nitrogen mustard is used as a chemotherapeutic agent.

Several properties of mustard agents make them ideal for battlefield use. Mustard is heavier than air and will accumulate in low-lying areas. Temperature affects volatility, with higher temperature aerosolizing mustard making it more deadly. Mustard agents rapidly penetrate skin and clothing. Full protective gear is required to protect soldiers or responders from injury.

Mustard agents are oily liquids ranging from colorless in a pure state to yellowish/brown when impurities are present. The smell associated with these agents has been described as that of mustard, garlic, or horseradish. The odor should not be relied upon for detection, due to olfactory fatigue and variability in the human olfactory sense.

Injury from mustard exposure follows a latency period with effects occurring in a delayed fashion. The eyes are the most sensitive to mustard exposure and exhibit effects earliest. Mustard exposure to the skin leads to blister and bullae formation. Inhalation of mustard vapors causes respiratory tract irritation and inflammation. Decontamination must occur immediately after exposure to prevent injury.

Mustard agents throughout the world are in the process of being destroyed, following the ratification of the Chemical Weapons Convention. However, there are conflicting data on the status of this effort.[1]  Most recent exposures are due to the handling of old ordinance.

The United States successfully completed the destruction of nearly 90% of its original chemical weapons stockpile in January 2012. The original stockpile in Colorado consisted of 2,613 US tons of the mustard agents HD and HT configured in projectiles and mortar rounds. The original stockpile in Kentucky comprised 523 US tons of nerve and mustard agents in rockets and projectiles, with approximately 90 tons of that quantity consisting of mustard agent H in projectiles.[2]

Operations are on target for completion by the Chemical Weapons Convention treat commitment of September 30, 2023. The first two campaigns are complete. The remaining 4.2-inch mortar round campaign is expected to end by the Chemical Weapons Convention treaty commitment of September 30, 2023. US public law mandates stockpile destruction by December 31, 2023.[2]

Despite ongoing destruction of US stockpiles, the chemical threat from sulfur mustard remains, due to the low cost and availability of these agents.

For patient education information, see Chemical Warfare and Personal Protective Equipment.

Background

Sulfur mustard was first produced in 1822 but was not deployed on the battlefield until the First World War (WWI). During the Battle of Ypres, Belgium in July 1917, Germany was the first nation to deploy sulfur mustard-containing artillery shells on the battlefield against British and Canadian troops. The Allied Powers in WWI referred to this agent as HS (Hun Stoffe), later shortened to H. Pure distilled sulfur mustard was given the name HD (Distilled Hun). Other names included yellow cross (how it was identified on artillery shells), Yperite (after the location of first use), S-LOST (from Lommel and Steinkopf, German chemists who developed mass production of mustard), or Kampfstaff LOST (Kampfstaff = warfare agent).

Mustard holds the title “King of the War Gases” due to the large number of casualties that it inflicted. This name is somewhat of a misnomer as mustard is an aerosol, not a gas. It is primarily used as an area-denial tool and to incapacitate troops.[3, 4]

Use of mustard agents continued after WWI. During the 1930s, Italy dropped mustard-containing bombs and sprayed mustard from aircraft during its invasion of Ethiopia and Japan employed mustard during its invasion of China. During WWII, both Allied and Axis powers produced significant amounts of mustard, including nitrogen mustard (Hn), but it was never used on the battlefield.[3]  A significant mustard release  occurred in 1943 when German bombers struck an American munitions vessel carrying mustard in the Italian port of Bari, resulting in 617 casualties and 83 fatalities from mustard released into the air and water.[5]

Since WWII, the Middle East has been the primary location for use of mustard agents. Egypt used mustard against royalist forces during the Yemen Civil War (1963-1967).[3]  During the Iran-Iraq War (1980-1988), Iraq deployed mustard against Iranian troops and civilian targets, generating a large number of casualties.[6]  More recently, in 2015 and 2016, mustard agents have been used by both Syria and nonstate actors (ISIS) as part of the ongoing Syrian civil war.[7, 8, 9, 10]

In April 1997, the US ratified the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC). Part of this treaty involves the destruction of US stockpiles of chemical and nerve agents, including mustard. Exposures to mustard still occur, largely due to accidental contact with discarded munitions or during disarming operations.[11, 12, 13]  Destruction of the US mustard stockpile is ongoing.[14]

Pathophysiology

Despite being referred to as gas, mustard agents are liquids at room temperature. Pure mustard is clear and odorless, while mustard with impurities is generally a yellow/brown oily liquid. The impurities give these agents the odor of mustard, garlic, or horseradish.[15]  

Persistence in the environment and level of vaporization depend on temperature. In more temperate climates, mustard agents vaporize slowly and may persist for a week. In desert climates, they vaporize rapidly and may persist for a day or more, depending on the extent of exposure. Rapid vaporization makes mustard more deadly in warmer climates.[16]  Mustard has a high freezing point (57°F) and must be mixed with other substances to lower its freezing point for use in winter environments.[4]  Sulfur mustard is 5.4 times heavier than air, leading to accumulation in low-lying area, which made it suitable for attacking trenches.[4, 16]

Mustard agents cause damage through multiple proposed mechanisms. Mustard agents are lipophilic and get absorbed rapidly through the skin. Once absorbed, they act primarily as alkylating agents that form highly reactive sulfonium (sulfur mustard) or imonium (nitrogen mustard) ions within minutes of absorption. These ions react with sulfhydryl and amino groups in proteins and DNA. Sulfur mustard alkylates purine bases (guanine and adenine) in DNA. This triggers the activation of cellular repair machinery, rapidly depleting cellular stores of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+). Depletion of NAD+ stores begins around 1 hour after exposure and peaks at 4 hours, leading to indirect inhibition of glycolysis and cellular necrosis.[16, 15, 17]  More recent studies indicate that sulfur mustard may also inhibit glycolysis directly.[18]  

Another proposed mechanism of mustard agents is a reaction with glutathione, causing its depletion and increasing cellular susceptibility to oxygen–free radical damage. Depletion of glutathione leads to the inactivation of sulfhydryl-containing enzymes, leading to the inability to control calcium homeostasis. Increases in intracellular calcium trigger the activation of cell death machinery, resulting in apoptosis. Depletion of glutathione also leads to lipid peroxidation, with formation of free radicals that damage cell membranes.[4]

Epidemiology

The lethal dose of sulfur mustard in humans varies by route of exposure. The median lethal concentration for inhalation (LCt50) is 1500 mg-min/m3. The medial lethal dose (LD50) is 50mg/kg for cutaneous exposure and 0.7mg/kg for oral exposure.[19] The LD50 for cutaneous nitrogen mustard exposure in humans is 75 mg/kg.[19]

Battlefield concentrations in WWI were estimated to be between 19-33 mg/m3. Exposures at these concentrations for several minutes led to eye and skin injury. Exposures of 30-60 minutes resulted in severe respiratory injury and death.[16]  The majority of chemical casualties in WWI were caused by mustard (76-88%), with a mortality rate of 2-3%.[4]  Mortality rates in the Iran-Iraq War were 3-4%.[16]

Physical

After exposure to mustard agents, the onset of signs and symptoms follows a latent period. If decontamination does not occur immediately (1-2 min), mustard absorption in unprotected victims commences. The eyes, skin, and respiratory system are the three immediate targets of mustard agents, with the eyes being the most sensitive and the earliest to display symptoms. Gastrointestinal (GI) effects are also seen. Bone marrow suppression occurs later, increasing the risk of infection. Deaths occur from respiratory compromise and infection brought on by immunosuppression.

Ocular Effects

The eyes are the organ most sensitive to mustard exposure. The exposure threshold for signs and symptoms to occur is roughly 10 times lower for the eyes than for other organs, and the latency period is the shortest.[20]  The rapid metabolic rate of corneal cells, the presence of a thin mucosal layer, and tears covering the eye make it markedly susceptible to the effects of mustard.[21, 22]  The majority of victims exposed to mustard (75-90%) will develop ocular signs and symptoms.[20]  Most soldiers exposed to sulfur mustard in WWI initially had conjunctivitis, photophobia, and blepharospasm.[20]

The onset and severity of ocular effects are a function of exposure dose and duration. Damage can occur via exposure to mustard vapor or liquid. Eye irritation has been reported within minutes of exposure, but typically develops after 1 hour.[8, 22, 23]  At lower concentrations, conjunctivitis, a foreign body sensation (grittiness), and reddening develop, with progression towards more severe conjunctivitis, lacrimation, blepharospasm, blurred vision, periorbital edema, and corneal injury leading to decreased visual acuity.[22]  

Liquid mustard exposure to the eye by contact with droplets or by self-contamination causes the most severe damage, which can lead to severe corneal damage and loss of vision.[4]  Corneal ulcers develop within 48 hours and the cornea may take on an orange-peel appearance.[22]  Miosis, anterior uveitis, elevated intraocular pressure, and hemorrhages can also be seen.[22]  Severe corneal erosions can lead to Pseudomonas infection.[24]  Development of panophthalmitis can lead to loss of the eye.[4]

Time to recovery depends on the severity of the injury. Victims may be visually disabled for 10 days following exposure.[25] Recovery from mild injuries occurs within 1-2 weeks, and recovery from moderate injuries takes 6-12 weeks. Severe injuries can take months to heal, or may be permanent.[20, 22]

Cutaneous Effects

The concentration of mustard required to produce skin lesions depends on multiple factors. Hot, humid weather results in more severe lesions. Warm, moist areas of the body such as the axillae, antecubital fossa, neck, external genitalia, and perineum are the most susceptible to damage. Mustard liquid penetrates the skin faster than vapor, but both are absorbed rapidly. There is a latent period between exposure and the development of skin lesions.[4]

The earliest sign on physical examination is the development of erythema. This can occur anywhere from 1-24 hours following exposure, with the average being between 4-8 hours. Erythema is accompanied by pruritus or burning pain. Vesicles begin to develop 2-18 hours later and may continue to form for several days.[4]

This development of blisters/bullae is what gives mustard its namesake as a blistering/vesicating agent. The bullae that form are dome-shaped, thin-walled, superficial, translucent, and filled with a clear or straw-colored liquid that coagulates over time. These tend to form in warm, moist areas of the body. This liquid inside the blisters does not contain liquid mustard. The liquid contains thiodiglycol, a mustard metabolite, which can aid in diagnosis. Vapor exposure generally causes injury similar to first-degree (superficial) or second-degree (partial thickness) burns, while liquid penetrates deeper and causes findings similar to third-degree (full thickness) burns.[4]

Blister healing depends on the severity of the lesion. Erythema resolves within a few days, while more severe injuries may take weeks or months to resolve. Both hyperpigmentation and hypopigmentation of skin can follow. Transient hyperpigmentation followed by exfoliation was seen in both WWI and Iran-Iraq war mustard victims. Hypopigmentation can occur if melanocytes are destroyed. This can last months or become permanent.[4]

Respiratory Effects

Exposure to mustard vapor causes irritation and damage to the respiratory tract mucosa. Upper airway structures are affected first, with lower airway structures becoming involved as the concentration of mustard vapor increases. Inflammation can range from mild to severe, with injury becoming more apparent over several days.[4]

Signs and symptoms of irritation develop 4 to 6 hours after exposure. Mild exposure can lead to a dry hacking cough; chest tightness; dyspnea; wheezing; and hoarseness, which may progress to loss of voice. These manifestations will usually be seen if the patient has ocular effects from exposure.[4]

Higher-dose exposures result in earlier development of respiratory symptoms and deeper penetration into lower airways. Epithelial sloughing and pseudomembrane formation can cause upper and lower airway obstruction.[4, 26]  Bronchitis progressing to bronchopneumonia over the course of a few days contributes to mortality.[4, 5, 21, 27]  In WWI, bronchopneumonia was a leading cause of death for mustard causalities.[28]  Mustard vapor generally does not affect the lung parenchyma and pulmonary edema is not common.[4]

Gastrointestinal Effects

Nausea and vomiting commonly occur within a few hours after mustard exposure. These tend to develop around the time that skin lesions appear and are thought to be due to cholinergic effects of mustard, due its unpleasant odor, or a result of a stress reaction. Initial nausea and vomiting are usually transient and resolve in 24 hours.[28]  Nausea and vomiting occurring later (24-36 hrs post-exposure) can be a result of systemic cytotoxicity of mustard, with damage to the GI mucosa. Diarrhea and GI hemorrhage is not common.[4]  If present, GI bleeding has a poor prognosis.[4, 29]

Hematopoietic Effects

Suppression of bone marrow from systemic absorption of mustard leads to increased susceptibility to infection and subsequent mortality. In an animal model, changes to the bone marrow can be seen as early as 4 hours post exposure, with extensive damage within 24 hours.[30]  Initially masked by a reactive leukocytosis following chemical injury, leukopenia becomes evident by days 3-5 and reaches its nadir in 7-9 days.[26, 28]  Leukopenia < 200 cells/mm3 or a rapid decline in leukocytes in one day indicates a poor prognosis.[4, 26, 28]  Thrombocytopenia and anemia lag behind leukopenia.[4, 10]

Neurologic Effects

Central nervous system (CNS) effects are not a prominent feature of mustard exposure. Most CNS complaints were nonspecific in mustard-contaminated victims of the Iran-Iraq War.[4]  Chronic neuropathic pain may develop years later in areas of skin exposure to mustard.[31] Allodynia, stinging, burning, itching, and numbness can be aggravated by changes in temperature or exposure to sunlight.[31]

Laboratory Studies

No clinically available laboratory test exists to identify or quantify mustard exposure. Mustard is biotransformed in tissues within minutes of exposure. Detection of mustard metabolites (thiodiglycol (TDG), thiodigylocol sulfoxide (TDG-sulfoxide), 1-methylsulfinyl-2-[2-(methylthio)ethylsulfonyl]ethane (MSMTESE), 1,1’-sulfonylbis[2-(methylsulfinyl)ethane (SBMSE), and 1,1’-sufonylbis[2-S-(N-acteylcyteinyl)ethane]) requires more advanced detection methods.[32]

Results of blood studies include the following:

Other Tests

The US military, as well as state and local emergency responders, have the capability to detect mustard agents on the battlefield or at the sites of suspected mustard agent release in the civilian environment. This capacity is effectively accomplished through the use of specialized equipment such as chemical detection papers, chemical detection alarms, gas detection tubes, photometric detection, ion mobility spectroscopy, Raman spectroscopy, and portable gas chromatography–mass spectroscopy. Some specific examples include the following[33, 34, 35, 36] :

Imaging Studies

Inhalation of mustard vapor causes chemical pneumonitis, which may progress to pneumonia. Serial chest x-rays are recommended to track progression. Chest computed tomography (CT) is more sensitive than chest x-rays in detecting chronic changes caused by mustard exposure.[37]

Prehospital Care

Initial care of patients contaminated with mustard agents should focus on removing the patient from the environment and initiating rapid decontamination procedures. Decontamination performed in the first 1-2 minutes following exposure is the most effective means of preventing injury as well as assisting to mitigate cross-contamination with others.[4] Decontamination helps to prevent further absorption and protect others involved in patient care from exposure.

Decontamination should be undertaken in the field, before transport to a medical facility. Providers attending contaminated patients should have protective masks, butyl rubber gloves (latex gloves are not adequate), and chemical protective overgarments. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration's (OSHA's) Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response (HAZWOPER) standard (29 CFR 1910.120[q]) provides additional information for responding to hazardous substance releases, including blister agents.

The level of personal protective equipment (PPE) needed depends on the sites where first responders are operating.[38]

Level A PPE (maximal protection) is needed for scenes in which the identity of the chemical weapon is unknown or levels of the agent are above Immediately Dangerous to Life and Health (IDLH) limits. It comprises the following:

Level B PPE (highest level of respiratory protection, less skin protection) is indicated for decontamination zones above IDLH levels. It comprises the following:

Level C PPE is indicated for decontamination zones with levels under IDLH. It comprises the following:

Level D PPE is indicated for zones where the concentration of the contaminant is below the exposure limit (minimal protection). It consists of work clothing with minimal protection.

Unless carried out within 1-2 minutes, decontamination of victims exposed to mustard agents does not prevent subsequent blistering. After that brief window, decontamination still should be carried out, in order to prevent secondary contamination of first responders and medical personnel at treating facilities. The decontamination procedure is as follows:

Emergency Department Care

There is no specific antidote or treatment regimen to reverse the effects of mustard agents. Care for exposed persons is supportive.

Treatment of Eye Exposure

Following irrigation, examine the eyes for corneal injury with fluorescein. Topical anesthetic can be applied for the initial exam but should not be used for continued pain relief. Use of topical anesthetics increases the risk of inadvertent corneal scarring, which can worsen infection. Instead, systemic narcotics should be used for pain control.[4]

Topical antibiotic ointment should be applied 3-4 times a day to reduce the risk of infection. Do not patch the eyes and do not allow the eyelids to stick together, as that can increase the risk of infection. Apply sterile petroleum jelly to lubricate and prevent sealing of the eyelids. In patients with mild injury (conjunctivitis), lubricating drops may provide pain relief. The efficacy of topical steroids has not been established, but these agents may be beneficial within the first 48 hours after injury.[4]

In patients with severe blepharospasm and photophobia, use cycloplegic eye drops (atropine or homatropine) three times a day for pain and to prevent adhesion formation. A darkened room or sunglasses may be helpful. All severe injuries require admission with emergent ophthalmologic evaluation.[4]

Treatment of Skin Exposure

Once all clothing has been removed and the patient has been decontaminated, evaluate the extent of erythema and blistering. Mild erythema does not require any specific treatment. Treat pruritis with calamine lotion, topical steroid creams, or silver sulfadiazine.[39]  Mild erythema does not require treatment.

There is no consensus on the treatment of blisters or bullae. If blisters or bullae have ruptured, debride the remaining material, clean the skin with sterile water or saline, and cover it with a sterile dressing.[39]  Chlorhexidine, povidone-iodine, and silver sulfadiazine can be utilized as disinfectants.[34]  Once the site is cleansed, apply topical antibiotic ointment to prevent infection. If infection occurs, treat with intravenous antibiotics. Control pain with narcotic analgesics. Ensure tetanus immunization is up to date.

Mustard injury to the skin is considered a chemical burn, which meets the criteria for referral to a burn center.[40]  Patients with more than mild erythema should be transferred for specialized care. Significant lesions may require skin grafting. Mustard injury is different from chemical burns and involves less fluid loss. Formulas for calculating fluid loss in thermal burns may overestimate fluid loss in mustard injury.[4]

Treatment of Respiratory Exposure

Mild respiratory symptoms (throat irritation, nonproductive cough, hoarseness) can be treated supportively. Nebulized saline or cough suppressants may be useful.[36]  Hypoxia should be treated with supplemental oxygen.

Patients in severe respiratory distress or with signs of airway compromise should be intubated early. The development of airway edema may make later attempts at intubation more difficult. Severe mustard injury can cause chemical pneumonitis similar to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), with bilateral infiltrates on chest imaging. A lung protective strategy for mechanical ventilation should be employed. Frequent suctioning of debris and secretions may be required. Bronchoscopy allows for direct visualization of airways and can assist with the clearance of debris.[4, 36]

Bronchodilators can help reduce bronchospasm. Albuterol/ipratropium bromide (Combivent Respimat, DuoNeb) should be administered. Greater efficacy has been seen using a combination of beta-2 agonists plus an anticholinergic agent in mustard exposures than using one agent alone.[37] Corticoteroids can be considered if the patient shows no response to bronchodilators.[4]

Pneumonia is a late complication of mustard exposure. It typically does not develop in the first few days. If pneumonia develops, begin antibiotic treatment.  

Treatment of Systemic Toxicity

Nausea/vomiting should be treated with antiemetics. If cholinergic symptoms are found, atropine should be used. Intravenous fluids should be given for dehydration and electrolytes repleted as necessary.  

Leukopenia increases susceptibility to infection and subsequent sepsis. If neutropenic fever develops, empiric antibiotic therapy should be initiated. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) has shown efficacy and should be considered if neutropenia develops.[41]

Thrombocytopenia and anemia lag behind leukopenia. If traumatic injuries are present, transfusion of platelets or red blood cells may be required.

Consultations

Consultations include the following:

Complications

Chronic respiratory complications are the most common cause of long-term disability following mustard exposure. In a cohort of Iranian mustard victims, 42.5% developed chronic lung lesions and respiratory signs and symptoms.[42]  The most common respiratory effects are dyspnea, chronic cough, and sputum production.[37, 43]  Bronchiolitis, asthma, tracheobronchiomalacia, and airway stenosis (in severely-exposed patients) are the most common long-term conditions associated with exposure.[37]  Pulmonary function test results evolve from an obstructive pattern to a restrictive pattern over time.[43]

Chronic ocular complaints are the next most common complication. In a cohort of Iranian mustard victims, 39.3% developed chronic ocular issues.[44]  Chronic inflammation of the eyes may occur or delayed keratitis may develop.[22, 45]  Itching, burning, and photophobia are the three most common complaints, with conjunctivitis, peri-limbal hyperpigmentation, and vascular tortuosity being the three most common exam findings.[46]  Delayed keratitis involves an asymptomatic period after mustard exposure with abrupt recurrence of keratitis, corneal opacification, corneal ulceration, neovascularization, pain, decreased visual acuity, and vision loss.[22]  This delay can span from 1 to 40 years following exposure, with most cases occurring between 15 and 20 years post-exposure.[22, 24, 46, 47]  Delayed keratitis can happen unpredictably, with periods of exacerbation and remission.[24]  

Chronic dermal findings are also prevalent, affecting 24.5% of Iranian mustard victims.[44]  The most common complaints are itching and burning, with hyperpigmentation, erythematous papular rash, and dry skin being the most common physical exam findings.[46, 48] Hypopigmentation can also occur but is less common. Chronic skin findings are usually noted in the groin, back, thorax, abdomen, and axillary areas.[46]

The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) has determined that there is sufficient evidence to classify sulfur mustard as a known human carcinogen (IARC Group 1) due to its alkylating effects on DNA. The strongest evidence exists for lung and laryngeal cancers, especially among occupational workers.[49]  Increased rates of cancers have been noted in acutely exposed Iranian war veterans, however, no specific type of cancer has been found to be statistically significant when compared with the general population.[42, 50]

Prevention

Dermostyx (IB1) is a topical skin protectant (TSP) developed by the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) to provide passive protection against percutaneous exposure to chemical agents, including sulfur mustard. When applied to the skin prior to exposure, this lotion forms a protective barrier that reduces the size and severity of skin lesions caused by vesicants, has an efficacy of 12 hours, has minimal side effects, and does not interfere with decontamination procedures.[51, 52]

Medication Summary

The goals of pharmacotherapy are to neutralize toxicity, reduce morbidity, and prevent complications.

Homatropine (AK-Homatropine, Isopto-Homatropine)

Clinical Context:  Contains homatropine hydrobromide, which blocks action of certain parasympathetic nerves and cholinergic drugs; used in ophthalmology for mydriatic and cycloplegic effects; peripheral effects are much weaker than those of atropine; preferred to atropine for diagnostic purposes because its action is more rapid, less prolonged, and is controlled readily by physostigmine; effect is exerted in 15-30 min and passes off in 12-24 h; usually does not produce complete paralysis of accommodation in children.

Atropine ophthalmic (Isopto, Atropair, Atropisol)

Clinical Context:  For use as long-acting mydriatic and cycloplegic; most potent ophthalmic parasympatholytic available; by paralyzing sphincter pupillae muscle, helps dilate pupil; also paralyzes ciliary muscle; effect lasts 7-10 d; also indicated to decrease GI motility.

Class Summary

Instillation of long-acting cycloplegic agents can relax any ciliary muscle spasm that can cause a deep aching pain and photophobia.

Atropine IV/IM (Atropair, Isopto, Atropisol)

Clinical Context:  Acts at parasympathetic sites in smooth muscle and decreases GI motility.

Dosage may require reduction in elderly patients due to possible occurrence of cardiovascular and CNS adverse effects.

Class Summary

Thought to work centrally by suppressing conduction in vestibular cerebellar pathways. They may have an inhibitory effect on the parasympathetic nervous system.

Morphine sulfate (Duramorph, Astramorph, MS Contin)

Clinical Context:  DOC for narcotic analgesia because of its reliable and predictable effects, safety profile, and ease of reversibility with naloxone; morphine sulfate administered IV may be dosed in a number of ways and commonly is titrated until desired effect is obtained.

Meperidine (Demerol)

Clinical Context:  Narcotic analgesic with multiple actions similar to those of morphine; may produce less constipation, smooth muscle spasm, and depression of cough reflex than similar analgesic doses of morphine.

Hydrocodone bitartrate and acetaminophen (Vicodin ES)

Clinical Context:  Drug combination indicated for relief of moderate to severe pain.

Class Summary

Pain control is essential to quality patient care. Analgesics ensure patient comfort, promote pulmonary toilet, and have sedating properties, which are beneficial for patients who have sustained burns.

Albuterol (Proventil, Ventolin)

Clinical Context:  Bronchodilator in reversible airway obstruction due to asthma; relaxes bronchial smooth muscle by action on beta 2-receptors with little effect on heart rate.

Albuterol/ipratropium (Combivent Respimat)

Clinical Context:  Combination of albuterol, a beta2-adrenergic bronchodilator, and ipratropium, an anticholinergic (parasympatholytic) agent

Class Summary

Primary action is to decrease muscle tone in both small and large airways in the lungs, thus increasing airflow and ventilation. This category includes beta-adrenergic, methylxanthine, and anticholinergic medications.

Class Summary

Topical and ophthalmic antibiotics routinely are used for dermal and ocular burns, respectively. Injured tissues lose many of their protective mechanisms and are at increased risk of infection.

Tetanus toxoid adsorbed or fluid

Clinical Context:  Immunizing agents of choice for most adults and children >7 y are tetanus and diphtheria toxoids. Necessary to administer booster doses to maintain tetanus immunity throughout life.

Pregnant patients should receive only tetanus toxoid, not a diphtheria antigen-containing product.

In children and adults, may administer into deltoid or midlateral thigh muscles. In infants, preferred site of administration is mid thigh laterally.

Class Summary

Used to induce active immunity against tetanus in selected patients.

Codeine/guaifenesin (Robitussin AC, Guiatuss AC, Mytussin AC, Brontex liq)

Clinical Context:  Treats minor cough resulting from bronchial and throat irritation.

Class Summary

Indicated for control of excessive cough.

Hydrocortisone 1% (Cortaid, Dermacort, Westcort)

Clinical Context:  Adrenocorticosteroid derivative suitable for application to skin or external mucous membranes. Has mineralocorticoid and glucocorticoid effects resulting in anti-inflammatory activity.

Class Summary

Indicated for inflammation of skin.

Author

Christopher P Holstege, MD, Professor of Emergency Medicine and Pediatrics, University of Virginia School of Medicine; Chief, Division of Medical Toxicology, Center of Clinical Toxicology; Medical Director, UVAHS Blue Ridge Poison Center; Executive Director, Department of Student Health and Wellness, University of Virginia

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Paul M Maniscalco, MPA, MS, EMT-P, National Director of Emergency Management, Medxcel/Ascension; Maniscalco and Associates, LLC

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Ryan J Cole, MD, Fellow, Division of Medical Toxicology, Clinical Instructor, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Virginia School of Medicine

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editors

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD, Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Received salary from Medscape for employment. for: Medscape.

Chief Editor

Zygmunt F Dembek, PhD, MS, MPH, LHD, Associate Professor, Department of Military and Emergency Medicine, Adjunct Assistant Professor, Department of Preventive Medicine and Biometrics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences; Senior Research Scientist, Data Science IV, Battelle Memorial Institute, Battelle Connecticut Operations

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Additional Contributors

Daniel J Dire, MD, FACEP, FAAP, FAAEM, Professor of Pediatrics and Emergency Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, Joe R and Teresa Lozano Long School of Medicine

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Fred Henretig, MD, Director, Section of Clinical Toxicology, Professor, Medical Director, Delaware Valley Regional Poison Control Center, Departments of Emergency Medicine and Pediatrics, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Children's Hospital

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

References

  1. Chemical and Biological Weapons Status at a Glance. Arms Control Association. Available at https://www.armscontrol.org/factsheets/cbwprolif. 2022 Mar; Accessed: March 27, 2023.
  2. PEO ACWA. https://www.peoacwa.army.mil/2021/09/21/facts-characteristics-of-mustard-blister-agents/. Program Executive Office, Assembled Chemical Weapons Alternatives. Available at https://www.peoacwa.army.mil/2021/09/21/facts-characteristics-of-mustard-blister-agents/. 2021 Sep 21; Accessed: March 27, 2023.
  3. Hilmas CJ, Smart J, Hill BA. History of Chemical Warfare. Textbooks of Military Medicine; Medical Aspects of Chemical Warfare. Office of the Surgeon General, United States Army; 2008. 9-76.
  4. Hurst CG, Petrali, JP, Barillo DJ, et al. Vesicants. Textbooks of Military Medicine: Medical Aspects of Chemical Warfare. Office of the Surgeon General, United States Army; 2008. 259-309.
  5. Alexander, SF. Medical report of the Bari Harbor mustard causalities. Mil Surg. 1947. 101:1-17.
  6. Secretary General. United Nations Security Council. Report of the Mission Dispatched by the Secretary-General to Investigate Allegations of the use of Chemical Weapons in the Conflict between the Islamic Republic of Iran and Iraq. United Nations Security Council. Available at https://www.securitycouncilreport.org/atf/cf/%7B65BFCF9B-6D27-4E9C-8CD3-CF6E4FF96FF9%7D/Disarm%20S17911.pdf. 1986 Mar 12; Accessed: March 19, 2023.
  7. Technical Secretariat. REPORT OF THE OPCW FACT-FINDING MISSION IN SYRIA REGARDING THE INCIDENTS OF THE ALLEGED USE OF CHEMICALS AS A WEAPON IN MAREA, SYRIAN ARAB REPUBLIC, ON 1 AND 3 SEPTEMBER 201. OPCW. 2022 Jan 24. Available at https://www.opcw.org/sites/default/files/documents/2022/01/s-2017-2022%2B%28e%29.pdf
  8. Sezigen S, Kenar L. Recent sulfur mustard attacks in Middle East and experience of health professionals. Toxicol Lett. 2020 Mar 1. 320:52-57. [View Abstract]
  9. Sezigen S, Ivelik K, Ortatatli M, Almacioglu M, Demirkasimoglu M, Eyison RK, et al. Victims of chemical terrorism, a family of four who were exposed to sulfur mustard. Toxicol Lett. 2019 Mar 15. 303:9-15. [View Abstract]
  10. Sezigen S, Eyison RK, Ortatatli M, Kilic E, Kenar L. Myelosuppression and acute hematological complications of sulfur mustard exposure in victims of chemical terrorism. Toxicol Lett. 2020 Jan. 318:92-98. [View Abstract]
  11. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Notes from the field: Exposures to discarded sulfur mustard munitions - Mid-Atlantic and New England States 2004-2012. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2013 Apr 26. 62 (16):315-6. [View Abstract]
  12. Newmark J, Langer JM, Capacio B, Barr J, McIntosh RG. Liquid sulfur mustard exposure. Mil Med. 2007 Feb. 172 (2):196-8. [View Abstract]
  13. Ruhl CM, Park SJ, Danisa O, Morgan RF, Papirmeister B, Sidell FR, et al. A serious skin sulfur mustard burn from an artillery shell. J Emerg Med. 1994 Mar-Apr. 12 (2):159-66. [View Abstract]
  14. Vergun D. DOD Approaches Goal of Destroying All Stockpiled Chemical Weapons. DOD News. 2020 Sep 21. Available at https://www.defense.gov/News/News-Stories/Article/Article/2354786/dod-approaches-goal-of-destroying-all-stockpiled-chemical-weapons/
  15. Young RA, Bast CB. Blister agents. Gupta RC. Handbook of Toxicology of Chemical Warfare Agents. Elsevier Inc.; 2020. 149-169.
  16. Borak J, Sidell FR. Agents of chemical warfare: sulfur mustard. Ann Emerg Med. 1992 Mar. 21 (3):303-8. [View Abstract]
  17. Papirmeister B, Gross CL, Meier HL, Petrali JP, Johnson JB. Molecular basis for mustard-induced vesication. Fundam Appl Toxicol. 1985 Dec. 5 (6 Pt 2):S134-49. [View Abstract]
  18. Martens ME, Smith WJ. The role of NAD+ depletion in the mechanism of sulfur mustard-induced metabolic injury. Cutan Ocul Toxicol. 2008. 27 (1):41-53. [View Abstract]
  19. Malaviya R, Heck DE, Casillas RE, Laskin JD, Laskin DL. Mustard Vesicants. Lukey BJ, Romano JA, Salem H. Chemical Warfare Agents Biomedical and Psychological Effects, Medical Countermeasures, and Emergency Response. Third. CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group; 2019. 131-144.
  20. McNutt PM, Hamilton TA, Lyman ME, Nelson MR. Ocular toxicity of chemical warfare agents. Gupta RC. Handbook of Toxicology of Chemical Warfare Agents. 3rd. Elsevier Inc; 2020. 572-578.
  21. Wattana M, Bey T. Mustard gas or sulfur mustard: an old chemical agent as a new terrorist threat. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2009 Jan-Feb. 24 (1):19-29; discussion 30-1. [View Abstract]
  22. Solberg Y, Alcalay M, Belkin M. Ocular injury by mustard gas. Surv Ophthalmol. 1997 May-Jun. 41 (6):461-6. [View Abstract]
  23. Kehe K, Thiermann H, Balszuweit F, Eyer F, Steinritz D, Zilker T. Acute effects of sulfur mustard injury--Munich experiences. Toxicology. 2009 Sep 1. 263 (1):3-8. [View Abstract]
  24. Javadi MA, Yazdani S, Sajjadi H, Jadidi K, Karimian F, Einollahi B, et al. Chronic and delayed-onset mustard gas keratitis: report of 48 patients and review of literature. Ophthalmology. 2005 Apr. 112 (4):617-25. [View Abstract]
  25. Safarinejad MR, Moosavi SA, Montazeri B. Ocular injuries caused by mustard gas: diagnosis, treatment, and medical defense. Mil Med. 2001 Jan. 166 (1):67-70. [View Abstract]
  26. Willems JL. Clinical management of mustard gas casualties. 1989. Available at https://www.opcw.org/sites/default/files/documents/DDG/HSB/medical_defence_CW_course_prereading/Chemical%20management%20of%20mustard%20gas%20casualties.pdf
  27. Dacre JC, Goldman M. Toxicology and pharmacology of the chemical warfare agent sulfur mustard. Pharmacol Rev. 1996 Jun. 48 (2):289-326. [View Abstract]
  28. Sidell FR, Hurst CG. Clinical Considerations in Mustard Poisoning. Somani SM. Chemical Warfare Agents. Academic Press, Inc.; 1992. 51-66.
  29. Somani SM. Toxicokinetics and Toxicodynamics of Mustad. Chemical Warfare Agents. Academic Press, Inc; 1992. 13-51.
  30. Needham DM, Cohen JA, Barrett AM. The mechanism of damage to the bone marrow in systemic poisoning with mustard gas. Biochem J. 1947. 41 (4):631-9. [View Abstract]
  31. Thomsen AB, Eriksen J, Smidt-Nielsen K. Chronic neuropathic symptoms after exposure to mustard gas: a long-term investigation. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1998 Aug. 39 (2 Pt 1):187-90. [View Abstract]
  32. Capacio BR, Smith R, Gordon RK, Haigh JR, Barr JR, Platoff GE. Medical Diagnostics. Textbooks of Military Medicine Medical Aspects of Chemical Warfare. Office of the Surgeon General at TMM Publications; 2008. 706-728.
  33. Rimpel LY, Boehm DE, O’Hern MR, Dashiell TR, Tracy MF. Chemical Defense Equipment. Tuorinsky SD. Textbooks of Military Medicine Medical Aspects of Chemical Warfare. Office of the Surgeon General at TMM Publications; 2008. 559-592.
  34. Williams KJ, Stevens J. Field Sensors: Military and Civilian. Lukey BJ, Romano JA, Salem H. Chemical Warfare Agents Biomedical and Psychological Effects, Medical Countermeasures, and Emergency Response. 3rd. CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group; 2019. 519-522.
  35. Seto Y. On-site detection of chemical warfare agents. Gupta RC. Handbook of Toxicology of Chemical Warfare Agents. 3rd. Elsevier Inc; 2020. 983-1004.
  36. Banks DE. Vesicants. Medical Management of Chemical Casualties Handbook. Office of the Surgeon General, Borden Institute; 2014. 29-64.
  37. Ghanei M, Harandi AA. Long term consequences from exposure to sulfur mustard: a review. Inhal Toxicol. 2007 May. 19 (5):451-6. [View Abstract]
  38. Chilcott RP, Lukey BJ, Slife HF, Clarkson ED, Hurst CG, Braue EH. Chemical Warfare Agent Decontamination from Skin. Lukey BJ, Romano JA, Salem H. Chemical Warfare Agents Biomedical and Psychological Effects, Medical Countermeasures, and Emergency Response. 3rd. CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group; 2019. 549-556.
  39. OPCW. Practical Guide for Medical Management of Chemical Warfare Casualties. 2019. Available at https://www.opcw.org/sites/default/files/documents/2019/05/Full%20version%202019_Medical%20Guide_WEB.pdf
  40. American Burn Association. Guidelines for Burn Patient Referral. 2022. Available at https://ameriburn.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/one-page-guidelines-for-burn-patient-referral-10.pdf
  41. Anderson DR, Holmes WW, Lee RB, Dalal SJ, Hurst CG, Maliner BI, et al. Sulfur mustard-induced neutropenia: treatment with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. Mil Med. 2006 May. 171 (5):448-53. [View Abstract]
  42. Zafarghandi MR, Soroush MR, Mahmoodi M, Naieni KH, Ardalan A, Dolatyari A, et al. Incidence of cancer in Iranian sulfur mustard exposed veterans: a long-term follow-up cohort study. Cancer Causes Control. 2013 Jan. 24 (1):99-105. [View Abstract]
  43. Darchini-Maragheh E, Balali-Mood M, Malaknezhad M, Mousavi SR. Progressive delayed respiratory complications of sulfur mustard poisoning in 43 Iranian veterans, three decades after exposure. Hum Exp Toxicol. 2018 Feb. 37 (2):175-184. [View Abstract]
  44. Khateri S, Ghanei M, Keshavarz S, Soroush M, Haines D. Incidence of lung, eye, and skin lesions as late complications in 34,000 Iranians with wartime exposure to mustard agent. J Occup Environ Med. 2003 Nov. 45 (11):1136-43. [View Abstract]
  45. Lagali N, Fagerholm P. Delayed mustard gas keratitis: clinical course and in vivo confocal microscopy findings. Cornea. 2009 May. 28 (4):458-62. [View Abstract]
  46. Balali-Mood M, Hefazi M, Mahmoudi M, Jalali E, Attaran D, Maleki M, et al. Long-term complications of sulphur mustard poisoning in severely intoxicated Iranian veterans. Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 2005 Dec. 19 (6):713-21. [View Abstract]
  47. Panahi Y, Rajaee SM, Sahebkar A. Ocular Effects of Sulfur Mustard and Therapeutic Approaches. J Cell Biochem. 2017 Nov. 118 (11):3549-3560. [View Abstract]
  48. Shohrati M, Peyman M, Peyman A, Davoudi M, Ghanei M. Cutaneous and ocular late complications of sulfur mustard in Iranian veterans. Cutan Ocul Toxicol. 2007. 26 (2):73-81. [View Abstract]
  49. International Agency for Research on Cancer. Sulfur Mustard. IARC Monographs: Chemical Agents and Related Compounds. International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2012. 437-446.
  50. Panahi Y, Gholami N, Ghojazadeh M, Moslemi F, Naghavi-Behzad M, Azami-Aghdash S, et al. Complications and Carcinogenic Effects of Mustard Gas--a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis in Iran. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2015. 16 (17):7567-73. [View Abstract]
  51. Eisenkraft A, Krivoy A, Vidan A, Robenshtok E, Hourvitz A, Dushnitsky T, et al. Phase I study of a topical skin protectant against chemical warfare agents. Mil Med. 2009 Jan. 174 (1):47-52. [View Abstract]
  52. Dachir S, Barness I, Fishbine E, Meshulam J, Sahar R, Eisenkraft A, et al. Dermostyx (IB1) - High efficacy and safe topical skin protectant against percutaneous toxic agents. Chem Biol Interact. 2017 Apr 1. 267:25-32. [View Abstract]
  53. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). Sulfur Mustard: Blister Agent. NIOSH. Available at https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/ershdb/emergencyresponsecard_29750008.html. 2011 May 12; Accessed: March 23, 2023.
  54. Blister Agents Guide. U.S. Department of Labor: Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Available at https://www.osha.gov/emergency-preparedness/guides/blister-agent. 2023; Accessed: on March 27, 2023.